Saturday, March 29, 2014

Is there and aerial rig for dslrs?




CCP


or do they only make "affordable" ones for the gopro
@Jim how come your answers never add any insight or help in any way?



Answer
Aerial means a couple of things... a jib crane is an aerial rig, as is an RC helicopter.

You need to define "affordable" in your terms. You can get into a crane type rig for less than $500, much less if you really look. If you want an actual flying rig, then you have to have something capable of carrying the weight of your camera gear. That is why the goPro and other POV cameras are so popular, you can use fairly small (and more affordable) flying rigs to carry a 4-6 ounce payload, than a 24-32 ounce payload of a DSLR.

JimA answers a lot of questions... or at least replies to them.

â¢Â Best Prosumer Level Camera for under $2000 & Advice â¢?




Tyler P


Hello Reader.

I'm a film student and I'm currently looking for a Prosumer Level Video Camcorder with a budget of $2,000. Our needs will be some outdoor footage, though nothing too fast-paced or demanding, some interviews, green-screen, and some indoor, on-set filming. Main use would be on a Camera Jib/Crane.

-I would like one that looks, and feels professional.

-I would like a Prosumer Camcorder, not a DSLR.

-I would perfer a camcorder with Digital Recording for SD Cards, but I can work with Mini DV Tapes and record with a FireStore. But I would perfer SD recording over DV as it is more economically feasible.

-Now tell me, would it be better to purchase a camera that can record onto SD Cards, or a camera with DV Tapes, with a flash storage FireStore. Which would be better quality? Remember, I need to transfer this footage onto a Computer.


Requirements:

â¢XLR Inputs
â¢Full 1920 x 1080p HD Resolution
â¢POWER Zoom
â¢High Definition Video Capture
â¢View Finder & LCD Screen
â¢Display Output (For External Video Displays)
â¢LANC Remote Input (Optional)
â¢Cinematone Gamma/Color
â¢High Frames per Second (Optional)
â¢Good in Low-Light Conditions (Optional)

Any help will be greatly appreciated.
Thank you so much for your time, have a nice day.



Answer
The advice provided to you at CNET is sound

http://forums.cnet.com/7723-7594_102-593620/best-prosumer-level-camera-for-under-2000-advice-8226/?tag=contentBody;threadListing




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Better DSLR Camera?




Jman18


Hey guys, I'm looking for a nice beginner's DSLR and I can't decide between the Sony α (alpha) DSLR-A100K or the Canon Digital Rebel XTI they both seem to have about the same features and I would like to know what the majority of the people would prefer. Thanks!


Answer
Here is a test that includes both of these cameras.

The February 2007 issue of Popular Photography has an article where they compared the top 10 MP DSLR's. I took the scores and ranked the cameras similar to the way Formula 1 gives championship points. I just gave 5 for 1st place down to 1 for last place, splitting the difference when cameras tied in their catagories.

They evaluated Image Quality (giving this twice as much weight as anything else), Ease of Use, Control, and System Flexibility.

The final order and my scores are:

Nikon D80 - 17.5 points
- BEST in Image Quality, Control and System Flexibility
Canon Rebel XTi (400D) - 13.5 points
- Tied for best in System Flexibility
Pentax K10D - 11 points
- Tied for best in Ease of Use
Samsung GX10 - 11 points
- Tied for best in Ease of Use
Sony Alpha 100 - 7 points
- LAST in Image Quality, Ease of Use and System Flexibility."

Then again, this is the same magazine that put the Sony Alpha 100 dead last in this comparison named it the camera of the year in the previous issue! (In a follow-up to this seeming error, Pop Photo published the explanation that only the D80 and the Sony had been tested by the end-of-year deadline for choosing the Camera of the Year. Sony won on the strength of low price and built-in image stabilization. The other 3 that beat Sony in shoot-out were not tested until after the Camera of the Year was selected, because they were not yet available.)

Go to the original question and read the responses for more opinions.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AiG00eHyd0oq5b.X7J.jiULzy6IX?qid=20070113133139AAHWJY0

If you want to get the "best" for the real world, consider the Nikon D200 or Canon 30D if you can afford it. For about $300-500 less, look at the results of the recent PopPhoto test and choose from that list according to your taste.

Personally, I use a Nikon D200 and would recommend it without hesitation to someone who has some knowledge of photography. For someone who wants the "best," but is starting with somewhat of an "entry level" knowledge base, I'd suggest the Nikon D80.

There are people out there who will state their preference for the Canon cameras and I will not argue with them. The Canon 30D and 400D are excellent cameras as well. You would have to visit a camera store or camera department and pick them up and see what you think.

This review is now available online at:

http://www.popphoto.com/cameras/3569/10mp-dslr-shootout.html

Here's another reference from outside the photographic press. Consumer reports compared the Nikon D80, Canon Rebel XTi and Sony Alpha. Personally, I'd say that the Nikon came out on top here, also. It beats the Sony in "noise-free ISO" with an acceptable rating at ISO 1600 (kind of optimistic, I think...) compared to the Sony's ISO 400. It beats the Canon (in my opinion) by having a spot meter that the Canon does not offer.

http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/electronics-computers/news-electronics-computers/november-2006/shootout-10-megapixel-digital-slr-cameras-11-06/overview/0611_digital-slr-shoot-out.htm

Here's another comparison or interest:

http://www.digitalcamerainfo.com/content/Canon-Rebel-XTi-vs-Nikon-D80-vs-Sony-Alpha-A100-Head-to-Head-to-Head-Digital-Camera-Review-.htm
[Note the navigation menu near the top of the review]

The next thing to consider is what lens to start with and where you go from there. If you are new to this, I'd say to just get the "kit" lens, which seems to be the 18-135 lens for the D80, and get started. Once you know where you really want to go with your photography, Nikon has an almost unlimited family of lenses to choose from.

Canon vs Nikon dslr camera?




oddperson6


I am looking to buy an slr camera. I have narrowed it down to the Canon XS (1000D) or the Nikon D3100. Does anybody know which one is better, or can you give me some pros and cons if you have used one of the two cameras. Or is there another one you like better? Thanks


Answer
I just upgraded from a 6 year old Nikon D50 camera to the D3100. The Nikon D3100 has everything I need for work related / family / amateur photography in one very adaptable unit. It is easy to take good photos using simple category settings for various situations.

We shoot family photos indoors using the standard 18-55mm VR lens. The camera adapts easily for video using the same lens. The VR does an excellent job of cleaning up the shakes and vibrations. Auto focus does a decent job keeping up with faces & motion. It has basically eliminated carrying an additional video camera for family events. Carry extra batteries. The batteries have about 1/4 of the life of my D50 battery. Video seems to eat batteries more quickly.

I also use my Nikon D3100 camera for work related photography - mostly with a 55-300mm VR zoom lens. I use it for taking photos of architectural projects, finished products, and factory applications for website and promotional purposes, as well as technical documentation. The camera is very adaptable to light conditions and produces professional looking photos with ease.

Using the zoom lens for video is an impressive option, but has some limitations. I was able to shoot video of a children's school program on a tripod with outstanding results. The clarity of the lens and camera's performance captured very high quality long-distance video. The sound quality was a little weak - I could use an external microphone option if available. The lens noise was also noticeable when using both auto-focus and VR stabilization. I recommend using a tripod and enabling VR, but using manual focus to decrease motor noise. It may pick up some VR noise, but the benefits outweigh the negatives.

Overall, I am enjoying my new toy and think it is exactly what I wanted at a reasonable price.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Wednesday, March 26, 2014

Camera rig/tool name or company?




hcfielden


So a while back, i saw this awesome camera rig that changed into a bunch of different tools, like a dolly, a slider, etc. it was pretty small, and yellow. The video for it was a young man setting it up on different objects for different scenarios. Does anyone know what this is? i've searched and searched through my history, but can't find it.


Answer
DSLR video rigs are made by a bunch of different companies such as Red Rock Micro, Opteka, and a bunch of other ones. Just google "DSLR video rig" and you'll find what you want.

DSLR microphone or track slider?




Leo


For my birthday I've made a deal with my parents that I'd pay for my car to get the ac fixed and they could get me either the Zoom H2n microphone or a track slider for my videos. Let me know what you guys think is most useful and why in terms of production purposes and basically which is more essential when it comes to videos. Also wanted to add that my camera, a Canon T2i, has magic lantern installed on it which gives it audio control and has helped a lot just by disabling the audio gain control. Thanks for your help!

Here are the links for the 2 products:

--Zoom h2n Microphone ($200) ----
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nMsOJVBz-uA&feature=relmfu

--Kamerar SLD-400 47" Camera Track Slider ($144.99) ----
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F2BkFi8Bq_4

And this is a sample of the Magic Lantern AGC - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=njz9614PX9k



Answer
It is all about personal preference.

For example, I don't need/want a slider or a dolly, so "I" would go for the mic. Someone else may be content with the built-in camera mic so they might want the slide instead.

Ask yourself which you would prefer...which would make your videos better and/or easier. Then make your choice.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Digital slr camera recommendation for beginners?




Dav


I prefer from nikon or canon. I was thinking d3100? 5100? d90? t4i?

I am trying to make this a hobby of mine.
I am a beginner but would like a camera that can expand beyond the basics. I want one with high performance and lasting durability. I don't know if years matter but 2011-2012 would be my preferable choice?

If you are very knowledgeable in this field, can you list some DETAIL recommendations?
What is aperture? What lenses is the best?

Best,



Answer
A Digital slr is known as a DSLR in the photography world. The nikon d5100 a excelent and decently priced camera for beginners. Anything more and you will be completely lost. Aperture is the balance of light in the intake when the shutters close. So basically its the ammount of light it take in. If you mess up the aperture, the entire picture will not come out. So, the shutter closes at a really fast speed, such as for sports, it has less time to take in light so you are going to need to ballance the aperture with that, therefor needing a greater aperture. For something such as fireworks, you need a very slow shutter speed and a VERY low aperture. If you are new to it, i would strongly suggest just your run of the mill digital camera to start. It takes a lot of time to get familiarized with DSLRs and SLRs.

best kind of video cameras?




Natalie


So my favorite video camera of ten years finally busted yesterday. :( I really need to get a new camera ASAP! I really would like to get one that I can use in college for when I major in digital cinema next fall as well as film projects right now... so something professional but not super ubber expensive would be nice. Thanks!


Answer
Three basic kinds of video cameras commonly used for student film projects are prosumer Mini DV, HD DSLR and Compact HD cameras.
If you want a professional tool to use throughout your studies, you want to look for a prosumer Mini DV camera and not a regular consumer Mini DV camera.The Panasonic DVX-100A or 100B prosumer Mini DV cameras have 24p mode to give your project the look of film. HD DSLR's are digital cameras designed to shoot both still pictures and video. The Canon 7D HD DSLR was used to shoot the feature film "Like Crazy" directed by Drake Doremus (2011) and "Tiny Furniture" directed by Lena Dunham (2010). Compact HD cameras like the Sony EX3 and the Sony HVR-Z7U shoot in high definition and 24p and can produce images unmistakable from what you see on television.
Try typing the name of any video camera you are considering into you-tube in order to see sample footage. You can find used prosumer Mini DV, HD DSLR and Compact HD cameras for affordable rates on craigslist or at www.bandh.com. Here's an example of a craigslist ad for a used Panasonic AG-DVX100B: http://boston.craigslist.org/gbs/pho/2793519824.html.

Best wishes for success with your endeavors.

-Adam

Adam Finelli, Owner
AdamCamera, LLC.
www.adamcamera.com
Source(s):
www.adamcamera.com




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Which mobile phones would you recommend as compare to omnia excluding iphone?




ButterMilk


need a photo with wifi to surf net. normal spec for music and not necessary high megapixel for camera, 5 will do. of reputable brand and durable and good.
typo from above. imean phone with wifi. high speed surfing.



Answer
Well, I have the Sprint HTC Diamond with a 3.2 mega-pixel camera and the HTC Touch Pro as well, the difference between the two is that the Pro has a keyboard slide and a flash for the camera.

is nokia x6 8gb a good mobile?




ANTONY D





Answer
x6 is better than Nokia 5800 and other look-alike.
Advantages:

The main advantage is capacitive display-so more responsive. Else 5 megapixel camera is good with flash. Plus it common features such as 3G, Wifi, built in GPS and video calling. You can get free navigation forever.(Depends on your location).

Cheaper than iPhones and Android phones

Disadvantage:

The processor is quite outdated so you may find it slow compared to other smartphones. 128 MB RAM results in "General: Memory Full!" errors- you will get this frequently when you use some extensive application s simultaneously. The UI itself is bit outdated compared to Android and iPhone.

Similarity:

Very similar to Nokias below...just wins by display, camera and looks

Nokia 5800 Same processor, 3.2 mpx camera, resistive screen (less responsive), GPS, Wifi, 3G, Video Call, Dual Speakers
Nokia 5530 Same processor, 3.2 mpx camera, resistive screen, Wifi, smaller screen, dual speakers
NO videocalling
Nokia 5230 Same processor, 2 mpx camera, 3G, GPS, NO videocalling, NO flash for camera, NO wi-fi




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Tuesday, March 25, 2014

Where can I find a good suction cup vehicle mount for my DSLR camera?




Jacob Wolf


I'm looking to purchase a rig for the exterior of a car with suction cups that is capable of holding my Canon DSLR camera. Which would you recommend for someone on a budget?
I want to do this for a photography class. I love cars and I wanted to try a few motion shots. I found a few that look good but are close to $200.



Answer
You want at least 3 high quality cups and a sturdy rig, like this one...

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Car-suction-cup-mount-G-51-for-DV-HDV-Nikon-Canon-DSLR-Sony-video-camera-/271143914042?pt=LH_DefaultDomain_0&hash=item3f216fca3a

Or this one...

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/898193-REG/Delkin_Devices_ddmnt_triple_Fat_Gecko_Camera_Mount.html

Looking for a DSLR Camera/Package for Christmas?




illHelpuOu


Hey everyone,
Im looking into getting my first DSLR camera for christmas and Im looking to see if there are any in a certain price range. I can spend probably around 400$ for one and it would have to have everything that I would need to get started (body+lens+any other required hardware (i have memory cards and i can get a case separate)). Are there any DSLR's out there for this price range!!?? I have no problem buying a model that is a couple years old or even a used model.

Thanks!



Answer
Canon Rebel XS 10.1MP Digital SLR Camera with EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Lens
http://www.amazon.com/dp/B001CBKJGG?tag=dcmb-20

Review:
I spent several weeks reviewing the REBEL XS vs it's many 10 MP adversaries, I even checked it against the ultra zooms as I wanted the convenience of video as well, but too many good things stood out with this camera and so I decided upon it. I bought the rebel XS and after days of dirt testing this camera I've found it a beautiful experience.
Now I'm a professional videographer attached to a tv station in Trinidad & Tobago, my purpose for this camera was the need for a quick sharp still shot camera that would be impressive under low light and still capture impressive portrait shots to be used for my website and for large prints. I didn't want to shell out over a $1000. US for a camera body.
What is tagged by Canon is true: The full auto mode is truly accurate and gives excellent shots always, it makes photography so easy for a beginner or intermediate. The portrait mode isn't blurry, images are clean, nicely toned, excellent in quality for large size prints. The P ( program mode) I like alot at first because this mode sets exposure so nicely I found it addictive. I shot alot of night pics of cars on a freeway, with bright, sharp, lively colours emerging. Night pics at 800 iso had very very very little noise, and I mean I was searching the pics on 15" monitors for reason to complain, but was really impressed.
The auto focus is really quick. Th XS comes with "only" a 7 point auto focus system compared to the XSi 9 point, forgive me when I say there may be no need for another 2 points when the camera focusses so quick and so accurately. I have not gotten a soft image when shot with the auto focus operating.
Now for those point and shoot cams that boast about "face detection"....5 faces...6,7, some even 15. I also have a 10 mp ultra zoom, this simply matters little if not at all, if the focussing ability of the camera is poor or average, and given the "average lens" quality they're made of.
I have learnt clearly that a 10 MP ultra zoom simply cannot compare to a 10 MP D SLR...chalk and cheese.
I also bought the Tamron 70mm - 300mm, F4-5.6 telephoto/ macro lens. No vignetting at either end of the lens.
Auto iso is simply magnificent, have not taken a shot where the camera over estimated or underestimated the iso levels.
The Manual mode of this camera is the most impressive for me. The rebel XS via various magazine testing has come up faster than it's other 10 MP rivals when it comes to fps shooting, and burst images. It really does shoot 3 fps consistently, it shoots 2.3 fps in low light, worst case is over 1 fps all at 10 MP quality.
I haven't used a lower quality since, given I bought a Transcend 8GB SDHC card storage is not an issue.
Most of my shooting has been at night, for the little done in daylight, it has been amazing. Colours are very bright, depth of field very very nice. Macros works well. Image optimizer simply shocked life out of me. I was in a shaded area and without flash it really improves the subject without over blowing the background, stuff that is almost impossible on point and shoot cams.

Stuff I disagree with from the "reviews" : 1- "The camera feels cheaply built"....simply wrong, nothing is shabby, buttons are actually easy to press, doesn't have cheap clicks to them, the lens mount has a secure feel to it, and a proper snap when it is set. Battery compartment is certainly secure. Your finger must intricately open the door for entry, won't be an accident issue. Rubber door at a.v. ports snap in well. Rubber grip is firm enough, smooth enough to not irritate your hands.
2- " XS is "overpriced" compared to the XSi.....Xsi shoots slower than the XS, XSi picture quality is equal to the XS even though the XSi is 12 MP. The XSi may be the 3" LCD and a few other upgrades, but these upgrades don't add up when the picture is taken and the quality of both cameras match alike. I may have chosen the XSI if I wanted to spend the extra $150. u.s but for the lesser price, I'm yet to regret.
3- "The XS "only has a 2.5" LCD compared to a couple of it's rivals having 3" LCD's". I can see every thing clearly with this screen, even with Histograms, and grids onscreen. If LCD's get much bigger then canon may need to install a tv tuner as well....the 2.5" is more than sufficient.
4- "The XS doesn't have SPOT METERING compared to the XSi, so this is a big issue"- haven't encountered a reason to complain yet, after 500 night shots and 200 day shots.

THE DOWN SIDE: the EOS software for uploading the photos to computer, and remote controlling the cam via computer is AWFUL. It's a task to upload, as it is beach balling when you hit "upload". Digital professional software is non responsive. I have not been able to use the software past the install point. Mac version here.
Better use i-photo and photoshop.

I highly rate this camera, and as




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

SLR Camera?

Q. hey im attending a concert next week and it says:

Note
No SLR cameras or recorders, patrons subject to search

i was just wondering if i could get a regular digital camera in, or would that be an SLR camera?

anddd... does ''patrons subject to search'' mean they will do a body search??


Answer
A SLR camera is a Single Lens Reflex camera which is a high quality camera, typically 6+ megapixels, which often have detachable lenses. They're characterized by a prism in the camera body which allows the photographer to see through the lens and preview exactly what the camera will take. The "reflex" is the action of moving the mirror below the prism out of the way so the light can pass through to the film or optical sensor.

My guess is that the promoters are hoping to prevent folks from taking pictures of sufficient quality to be sold but also allow ordinary picture takers to take "snapshots" while at the event. An example of an SLR camera is the Canon Rebel EOS. Such cameras would be hard to hide on one's body.

An example of a non-SLR camera is anything from a $10 disposable film camera to something like the Nikon Coolpix line of cameras. These are smaller. Current digital cameras can be as small or smaller than a pack of playing cards.

Your second question is a legal one I'm not qualified to answer. However, packages being brought in certainly can (and likely will) be searched and security might do more extensive searching if they suspect criminal activity. But that's just a guess on my part.

A QUESTION ABOUT SECURITY CAMERAS!?




Abc D


Why are thier quality so bad?
I mean if its like at least 5 megapixel you can at least see the robbers face clearly and all hes wearing.
but security cameras are fuzzy, sometimes black and white, and blurry?
I mean whouldnt it be much easier to get a better quality camera?



Answer
Cheapo crap camera plugged into VCR: $100
High Quality CCTV system: $3,000

Both have the same deterrent value, and neither has the ability to see through a ski mask. Who is going to spend $5,000 on security equipment that can be defeated by a $15 purchase?

$100 is a sound investment, but the $5,000 camera is not 50 times more likely to prevent a robbery. And neither the $100 camera nor the $5000 is likely to actually get back the $300 stolen from the cash register.

Eh, my solution if I am setting this up: Get a crappy used computer, a high-quality webcam ($50), a long USB chord ($50) so the computer can be kept hidden in a file cabinet or something. Set it to record 24/7, and delete older recordings automatically when space needs to be freed. Just as cheap, deters just as much, and has quality similar to the $3000 system.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Tablet for Video Chat in India ?




Ramya


Hi,
I am searching for a good tablet which should have good video chat facility.Which supports skype or Gtalk.Should support wifi and Bluetooth.The tab should be in 10k range.Please help me which model should I buy?



Answer
Go with Micromax Funbook for around 6499 INR
http://www.flipkart.com/micromax-funbook/p/itmd8fef6gw7uj9q?pid=TABD8FCDTTTNHFY3&affid=genoaibibo&ref=21c53bb3-9d4f-476b-890a-d49ad0f5abcb
It has 0.3 megapixel VGA front facing camera.

You can install the Google+ app from Android App Store for video chatting.
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.google.android.apps.plus
It allows video chat with up to 9 friends with mobile Hangouts

Which Laptop between these two?




Thomas Wal


I think I have narrowed it down to these two:

Lenovo G570: - http://www.amazon.co.uk/Lenovo-Notebook-i5-2410M-Blu-ray-Windows/dp/tech-data/B004TQQGFE/ref=de_a_smtd

Intel i5 2410
Dedicated Graphics - AMD Radeon HD 6370M
6GB RAM
750GB Hard drive
Blu Ray Optical Drive
0.3 Megapixel Webcam
or

Acer Aspire 5750: - http://www.amazon.co.uk/Lenovo-Notebook-i5-2410M-Blu-ray-Windows/dp/tech-data/B004TQQGFE/ref=de_a_smtd

Intel i7 2630 QM
Integrated Graphics
4GB RAM
500GB Hard Drive
DVD Optical Drive
1.3 Megapixel Camera

I will be using it for schoolwork, editing and uploading youtube videos, skype, flash games, surfing the web and streaming 1080p HD videos. - lots of multitasking.

Would the i7 be faster for this? Or would the dedicated graphics help the i5 so it is better? In particular for streaming HD video.

Thanks.



Answer
I personally prefer Lenovo, and the graphics are better, but the i7 is an i7 and it almost seems that they would have the same speed, since the i7 has a 4gb ram but the i5 has a 6gb ram, but I'm no expert, this is just me trying to figure it out.

Also, the i7 has a better camera and if you want to skype and upload on youtube and stuff, the camera would be better, but again, you could always buy a separate camera.

Decisions, decisions. =/




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

0.3 megapixel camera?




Sabrina


I was considering buying an ASUS A53U-EH11 laptop for simple tasks (Facebook, email, internet, typing papers, video chatting) and I was wondering about the quality of the camera. Is 0.3 megapixels enough for video chatting? Thank you!


Answer
That's pretty low, but you should be ok with video chatting. Usually, the MP refer to still photos. What you're wanting to look for is the resolution at which it records videos and the FPS (frames per second).

What is the iPhone 4S front camera resolution?




Cody


the FRONT FaceTime camera.? how many megapixels and does it shoot HD?


Answer
Front camera with VGA-quality (0.3 megapixels) photos and video at up to 30 frames per second and its not HD




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

buying a dslr camera?




darkchaos


hello,
I'm planing to buy a dslr camera. This is going to be my first dslr camera. First of all, I'm not into making videos at all. I've been shooting photos with a compact digital camera, and now I need better a equipment. I'm into landscape, travel, Macro, little bit of action,potraits and normal other photography.

I'm a hobbyst, I need to improve my photographing skills, specially to take photos creatively. You know what I mean. I don't want to become a total slave auto focus. Anyway, I'm student and I have a budget problem too, My budget is around 500$. I've been thinking of Nikon D3100 (since lots of people recommend it) , I have been interested in Canon rebet Xsi 450D which seems to be a good camera. Then I have found some good bargains for Used cameras Nikon d5000 and canon 500D.

So I need this camera in an photographic edge. To shoot artistic photographs. So now I'm confused. Cameras complexity doesn't matter. I easily get going with any tech stuff just within few mins.

I really appreciate your advice.
ps : I'm planing to buy this camera for two, three years and then I'll upgrade to a better camera. Right now developing and sharpening photographic skills is the most important thing.



Answer
Look on craigslist for good used Nikon and Canon dSLR cameras.

As you know, the camera is fully capable of shooting the subjects you want, but you will need lenses.

One type for just about each of the listed subjects.

10-24 mm for landscapes
60 mm or 105 mm macro lenses
70-300 mm for shooting action or a 18-200 mm for a single lens solution until you can save up more pennies.


Good luck in your search.

Which is The best DSLR Camera for me?




C.


I have never owned a DSLR camera before But I want a camera that has very good quality images and takes good quality video as well. I am looking for quality better than a regular 14 megapixel digital. I have found three cameras for under 500 dollars on Jessops.com But im not sure if its worth paying 100 dollars more for a 15 megapixel camera rather than a 10 megapixel camera. All three are cannons.
So basically my question is..does a 10 MP DSLR camera take btter pictures than a 14 MP digial camera? and will the video quality be good? or should I buy the 15 MP DSLR? Is it worth the price difference?

15 MP model : Canon EOS 500D with 18-55 DC Lens
http://www.jessops.com/online.store/products/78164/show.html

10 MP model : Canon EOS 1000D + 18-55 IS Lens
http://www.jessops.com/online.store/products/75075/show.html
I can't figure out if this takes video?

A similar 10 MP : close Canon EOS 1000D + 18-55mm Kit (Not sure what the difference is from the one above?)
http://www.jessops.com/online.store/products/75886/show.html ( Not sure if this has video either)

and will I need to buy additional lens?

Or if you have any suggestions? I definintly want video as well.

Thanks!



Answer
The 1000D does not do video. The 500D also beats the 1000D in AF points (9 versus 7), size of LCD screen, continuous frame speed and processor (Digic 4).

In other words the 500D is the one to go for over the 1000D.

At Jessops some other options are:

Sony a390 with 18-70mm lens
Pentax K-x (won TIPA best beginner DSLR in 2010)
Nikon D3100 with 18-55mm
Pentax K-r with 18-55mm

To begin with use the lens provided. You only need another lens when you've identified a use for it. e.g. I bought a 50mm f/2.8 to do portraits of my baby and a 70-300mm to take to an airshow. I would never buy a lens unless I have a specific need for it.

Cheap 50mm are availble on eBay for most camera models and they're very useful. They tend to be fast (f/1.8 or f/2.8 for example), good for portraits and low light and they also get you thinking and moving on your feet as you cannot rely on 'zoom.'




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Monday, March 24, 2014

I'm looking for a new digital camera. Would like some help or recommendations?




Heybail


I'm unfortunately on the market for a new camera and I am terrible when it comes to shopping for one. I was hoping to get some help or recommendations.

In 2008 I got a Fujifilm Finepix J10 that I was very happy with.
http://www.fujifilm.com/support/digital_cameras/specifications/j/finepix_j10/

In 2011 I got a SONY Cyber-shot DSCW730.
http://store.sony.com/p/Sony-Cyber-shot-W730-Camera/en/p/DSCW730/L

I'm looking for something similar. A point and shoot camera that takes nice pictures, is easy to use and will fit in my pocket.

4x or higher optical zoom.
15-16 megapixals or more.
Flash is a must.
Video capability is a must. I'd prefer it not be in MP4 format and I also liked being able to zoom in video.

I enjoyed the different modes that I got with the Fujifilm and used them all the time.
I also would like to have a panoramic mode.

I don't care about the brand or the color. I also don't have a particular price range in mind, as long as it's reasonable.

Thank you!



Answer
I like the Nikon P330, or if you are not concerned about pocket size, the P7700. They don't have the high megapixel count sensors you want, but their sensors are larger (in physical size - not megapixels), which means better low-light capability.

http://www.amazon.com/Nikon-COOLPIX-Digital-Camera-Black/dp/B00BOZCSQE/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1373104991&sr=8-1&keywords=nikon+p330

Besides, anything above 10Mp is overkill these days anyway. For proof, the $6,000 Nikon D3s is only 12 Megapixels.

If you insist on a high megapixel sensor, you are losing out on a lot of fine cameras.

Besides, megapixels do not provide any indication about quality - they only give you a certain resolution. And it takes double the megapixels to notice any difference anyway, so the difference between 12 and 16 megapixels is negligible.

High Speed still images from video!?




Carlyn


im wanting to find a video camera capable of producing video with high enough quality that i can take stills out of the video. the reason for this is im doing some sports and want some stills of precise points of impact of a bat and a ball. and i dont want to use my dslr. i want to be able to set up a camcorder in a certain position and let it sit while i take pics of different angles with my dslr.

will any camcorder compare to what a dslr can produce ?

my budget is about $1200 but if thats unrealistic i will have to go more but shooting for 1200.

and preferably a camera that a waterproof case can be purchased for.



Answer
It's probably not a good idea.

Know why?

The highest-resolution HD video is 1920 pixels wide by 1080 pixels high. That's the equivalent of a 2-megapixel still camera. And that's the highest resolution image you could possibly pull out of a video file.
Additionally, stored digital video is "keyframed" -- the compression methods used to store digital video save an occasional full-resolution "keyframe" image, and then interpolate the succeeding images based on changes from the keyframe image for the next bunch of frames. Even the changes from the keyframe image are compressed (non-losslessly) as well. So for you to pick one arbitrary frame out very likely means you're not hitting a "keyframe," and are getting an interpolation -- so you won't even get a full 2MP image, you'll get a motion-compressed partial frame. Then there's rolling shutter artifacts, etc. to worry about...

The best way to do this is to get a sound/optical trigger, and use your DSLR. That will let you get the *exact* moment you want to capture, at high resolution and with no losses.
Here's one inexpensive piece of equipment that will help you do this:

http://www.makingitasapro.blogspot.com/2011/07/high-speed-flash-with-hiviz.html

Peace.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Kodak - EasyShare 8.2-Megapixel Digital Camera?




mandy_25_1


ok i have that camera and when i try to add pictures back to my camera from my computer it says couldn't be supoorted by that...like to i have to rename or put the pick in a different format like jpg? so something


Answer
Yes it is true because the old cameras not having new technology where as computers are able to them in the latest versions.

Why wont my camera import my videos?




mkrupanski


I have a Kodak 8.2 megapixel camera and I just took a video, went to iPhoto, tried to import, then iPhoto froze. It didn't work in iMovie either. Is there something i can download to import video from my camera for Mac?


Answer
As far as I know, kodak csptures video in mov format which is a container format, so it may contain the codec that imovie could not recognize. So you need to change the file extension to dv--most friendly to imovie according to my knowledge. Read this tutorial. Just evaluate by yourself.

http://www.kodak-video-converter.com/how-to-importedit-kodak-video-into-imovie-on-mac.html




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Camera Megapixels?




asere


When buying a digital camera does it really matter or is there a noticeable difference in the megapixels say 6.0 - 8.0? Is looking at how much pixels one of the main things to look for?


Answer
Pixels are the tie-breaker when choosing a camera - especially when comparing 6 to 8 MP.

Having said that, though, here is my stock answer on the pixel count. It is sure to cloud the issue for you.

If you always plan and compose your pictures perfectly, you don't need a whole lot of pixels. These days, I'd say that 5 MP or even 4 MP is fine for the average snapshooter and this can be obtained without unreasonable expense. If you want to allow for cropping, which means enlarging only a portion of your image, the more pixels the better.

Imagine taking a scenic view and then noticing that the middle 20% of the photo would make an even better picture. Suppose you take a picture of a whole group of people and Aunt Clara really, really looks great in the picture, but everyone else looks lousy. If you have the pixels to work with, you can still make a decent print of Aunt Clara that she would be happy to have. If you buy an 8-to-10 MP camera and don't want to TAKE large photos, you can always set the camera to a lower file size. You can never go the other direction, though. Unless the cost is a major issue, buy the camera with more pixels. You will never be sorry that you did, but you might one day be sorry that you didn't.

I have a few photos on Flickr to include in a discussion on how many pixels are enough. Go to my page at http://www.flickr.com/photos/samfeinstein/tags/pixels/ Some of the pictures are from a 4 MP or even 3 MP camera, showing you what you might expect without any cropping. I think they are quite acceptable. Some of the pictures are from a 10 MP camera (the swan and the pansies), showing the value of having those large images so that you can crop a smaller image out of the original picture and still end up with a satisfactory image. There is one VGA picture, just to show what you could expect from 640 x 480 pixels - not much.

Ken Rockwell has an interesting article on pixels and the pixel wars:

http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/mpmyth.htm

Having said all that, though, pixels are not the only measure of image quality. The sensor size is important as well as the image processing software included in the camera. (See http://www.flickr.com/photos/7189769@N04/476181751/
You need to read reviews if you want a critical understanding of image quality for particular cameras. Try http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/ for more information on the cameras you are considering. Pixels are not the decision maker, but they are the tie breaker, so go for the higher pixel count.

You can go there and click on "Buying Guide" and then "Features Search" to specify how many pixels you want to look at.

You can also go to http://www.steves-digicams.com/default.htm and click on "Our reviews," where you will find catagories of cameras arranged by pixel count.

megapixels in digital cameras?




TripleThre


i want to buy a new digital camera but idk which one 2 get. one i am looking at has 10 megapixels. the other has 12. what is the difference bw the 2 types of megapixels. iswa megapixel the quality in a digital camera?


Answer
Megapixels is not as important as you think it might be, unless you like to print big images. I have an old Nikon D1H that only has 2.74 megapixels and it cost like 3 grand back in the day. It takes amazing pictures for me.The image quality is better on the 2 megapixel Nikon than my new 8 megapixel point and shoot.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Is the Canon® EOS Rebel T3 Digital SLR Camera a good camera for filming?




ichigo_dj





Answer
It can shoot video, but film is the domain of 16 mm and 35 mm motion picture cameras.

The dSLR cameras that have a video feature need some additional accessories to make them into a viable video recording device.

Take a look at this link

http://mauromedia.com/cameras/dslr-shoulder-mount-mauromedia-tech/

Here is a little video showing how a dSLR can be used as a video camera.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ux5oAksAcPM&feature=related

As you notice, the production company uses the same tools to produce video as would a motion picture company, cranes, dollies, underwater housings, etc.

What kind of video camera do you need to shoot quality film ?




Duderoni


Not talking Hollywood just for a quality indie film


Answer
Capture quality FILM using a film camera... Arri and Panavision make good ones.

Capture quality video using a camcorder. It depends on the "quality" you need and what conditions you plan to capture the video.
Camcorders start at around $100 and have small lenses and imaging chips which means they won't handle low light situations very well. As well, audio controls and the ability to connect external mics generally does not exist.

As the camcorder or camera gets more expensive, the lens diameter gets larger - so do the imaging chips. This typically equates to better low light performance. Around the "mid" range $600), mic jacks start to appear. At around $1,000, manual audio control appears.

What is your budget?

Consumer Pocket cams up to about $200.
Consumer Camcorders
entry level up to about $400
mid range up to about $900
high end up to about $1,200
Prosumer camcorders up to about $3,000
Professional grade has $4,000; $9,000; $30,000 and $70,000 ranges... and several past this.

Then there's the crop of dSLRs that can capture decent video (but don't do a very good job with audio - but audio can be captured externally and synch'd with the video during editing... which is what studios do all the time).

Then there's mics, lighting, tripod/SteadyCam/GladeCam vest systems, camera cranes and other steadying systems, lights, cables, dolly/track systems and bunches of other stuff...

Start with a budget range, and lets see what fits... And while you are thinking about that, what computer do plan to edit on? What editing package will you edit with?

The camera or camcorder is just one part of a much larger system of inter-related equipment...

And yeah... this is "indie" level.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Is there a quiz that i can take to tell me the best camera for me?




Lucky :]


im talkin a legit photographers camera. i want to take action shots day or night, candid everyday shots, posed, anything and everything. If you dont know of a quiz can you give me an idea for a good camera? most have said the Cannon Rebel is great


Answer
Yes, there is a quiz, you are looking for a DSLR. Try this quiz.
http://www.dpreview.com/learn/?/Guides/dslr_buying_guide_01.htm

And, yes, the Canon Rebel is excellent. Be aware that there are several models of the Canon Rebel.

DSLR or SLR? is the canon powershot sx50 hs a good choice?




liz22293


Ok I dont know the real difference between the two.. im looking to buy a camera I dont want just some point and shoot I want to take some what professional looking photos but without spending thousands for equipment my limit would probably be $700 (at least for now to start with) now I found some fun little online quiz on what camera would be best for you and the canon powershot sx50 hs was 100% I looked it up and red nothing but great reviews so im probably going with that one but im new to the whole working a actual camera as I always just have my phone at the ready.. now I also love how my phone I can use different kind of filters and effects like making it black and white or vintage look can I do that with a DSLR if those kind of cameras can do that or would I need the photos on my computer to edit them id be fine having to do that

If you had red all that im sorry it was so long just wanna make sure im getting a good camera and something easy to work for a beginner starting o



Answer
A DSLR is a specific type of SLR. Convention is that SLR is a term used for the film cameras even though in reality the term SLR has nothing to do with the capture medium but is a description of the viewfinder/taking lens mechanism.

That aside the SX50 is not an SLR of any type. It is a bridge camera.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Cell phone camera megapixels?




TyG88


I'm shopping phones and a couple say they have a 1.3 or 1.4 megapixel camera and another say it has a 2.0 megapixel. Which is the better quality camera?


Answer
Technically 2.0 is more superior but it also depends on the brand of the cell phone like SonyEricsson always have a good image processor on their mobile phones.

Another thing you need to know is they are only good for amateur photos, they won't create any professional quality pictures. If you want a camera then you shop for a camera instead but if you shop for camera phone then look for a higher number of megapixels.

buy new mobile?




some name


which is best N70 r N72 r N73 and Can anyone tell me what are its defects.. If u r using it, how do u feel about it...??? Kindly help me....


Answer
The N73 is a great phone. Its 3.2 megapixel camera is high quality, its relatively sleek, and its battery literally keeps going and going and going.... It also has a web browser, which is awesome for a phone of this price.

That would be my pick of the phones mentioned.




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Sunday, March 23, 2014

Can you get the same picture quality for two different types of cameras with the same amount of megapixels?




Ace


So, I'm looking for a good quality camera, and I know the higher the megapixels, the better looking the picture will be.
I was originally planning on buying a nikon D3000 which has 10 megapixels and goes for $500
But then I saw a digital camera that has the same exact number of megapixels as the nikon, but for a cheaper $150.
Would the pictures look essentially the same considering their amount of megapixels are the same? Or is there something about the Nikon that makes the pictures so amazing besides megapixel quantity?



Answer
The number of megapixels describes how the digital sensor is divided into digital "sections". The more sections, the more detail is possible.

BUT, digital single lens reflex (dslr) cameras have sensors that are several times larger than the ones in compact digital cameras. You're partitioning off a smaller sensor.

It's like saying two cars have 8 cylinders. Can they both have the same horsepower? Not if one is an 8-cylinder compact and the other is an 8-cylinder truck.

http://www.bobatkins.com/photography/digital/size_matters.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image_sensor_format

what camcorder our there is closest to a 35 mm camera's image?




dustin m


i hate hd


Answer
Hi Dustin:

What most filmmakers & videographers mean when they talk about "that 35mm still camera look" is high resolution and narrow depth-of-field (subject in-focus and background blurred).

Some of these qualities, both in 35mm film and digital work, are due to the image size (large number of pixels or fine film-grain) as well as the optical characteristics of the 35mm camera lenses and focal plane.

To bridge the gap between DSLRs (with large multi-megapixel sensors) that shoot video and camcorders (with their smaller 1/8" to 2/3" sensors), the Micro Four-Thirds Consortium was formed to develop mirrorless interchangeable lens cameras ("MILCs" for short) among manufacturers like Panasonic and Olympus. The "four-thirds" stands for the 4/3" (1.333" diagonally) size of the image sensor. The image format is also 4:3 ratio (instead of HD's 16:9), which is another reason for the name.

For typical model numbers of MFT cameras & lens options, see the Wikipedia article on the subject: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Micro_Four_Thirds_system

Other cinematographers have embraced the use of DSLRs like Canon's EOS 7D, the Sony Alpha System, and various Nikon D-series to take advantage of various lens choices and depth-of-field capabilities, but by nature these are not camcorders.

Traditional movie camera manufacturers (like Arri and Panavision) have developed large-sensor digital cinema camera systems to stay competitive with high-resolution newcomers such as the "Red One" camera system and Sony's CineAlta line. All these are in the very high-end of the "camcorder" price range ($25,000 and more).

As always, image quality is only limited by your budget.

hope this helps,
--Dennis C.
 




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

digital camera megapixel question?




lor


is higher megapixel the better? (image quality)
because i have a 2 mp camera and my brother has a 7 mp camera....when i compared the difference of photos.....i don't see any difference!.....
so that made me wonder???
i heard 4 or 5 megpixels are good enough for everyday pictures.....



Answer
In general higher resolution (more megapixels) means better image quality. There may be situations where that isn't true (i.e. where the higher resolution camera has a low quality lens and the lower resolution camera has a great lens) but generally more megapixels = better image quality.

There may be several reasons why you're not seeing any difference in the images.

1. Many times I've seen people unknowingly using cameras at lower resolutions than the camera is capable of. That lets you put more photos on your memory card, but the quality will be lower. If a 2MP camera and a 7MP camera are both set to 1MP resolution, they're going to look pretty much the same. Check to see if both cameras are shooting at their highest resolution.

2. If you're viewing the images on the camera display or on a PC screen, the resolution of the display or screen is far lower than the maximum resolution of the camera, so you probably won't see any difference. If your PC display is set to 800x600 resolution, that's less than 1/2 megapixel being displayed, so the images will look pretty much the same. Even a 19" monitor set to 1280x1024 is only about 1.25MP, so that's still far less than the maximum resolution of either camera.

3. If you're printing photos at 4x6, you probably won't see much difference. The differences will show up when you get to larger prints like 8x10 or larger. Like with the screen, the smaller size of the print isn't going to show the differences between the cameras. Large prints usually will show the differences.

If you're doing any image editing, having a higher resolution camera can be important. Say you have a photo of Uncle Frank at the beach and you decide you want to crop it down so that the lifeguard stand on the right and that goofy kid who jumped into the picture in the background on the left aren't in the photo and all you have is a nice close-up of Uncle Frank with the sand and water behind him. When you crop the image to only show the parts you want, you're reducing the effective resolution of the photo. If you crop out 1/3 of the image on the right and 1/3 of the image on the left, what remains is only the center 1/3 of the original image. If you shot the original at 7MP, that means that you have about 2.33MP left, because you threw away 2/3 of the image. If you shot the original image at 2MP, that leaves you with only about 0.67MP. You'll probably notice the difference between 2.33MP of image and 0.67MP of image in a 4x6 print.

So if you're going to be doing any image editing and/or printing at larger sizes, having a higher resolution camera may be a good idea. If you're doing just snapshots that you'll be printing at 4x6 or maybe 5x7 or just viewing on a PC screen, then you may not see any benefit to having a 7MP camera over a 2MP camera. And if the 7MP camera is set to shoot at a lower resolution, then there may be no difference at all.

What is the highest megapixel camera available currently?

Q.


Answer
The highest pixel count camera available at present is the Hasselblad H3Dii50 with a 50 mp Kodak sensor

The highest pixel count DSLR at present is the professional D3x with 24.5 mp and Sony A900 semi-pro camera with 24.6 mp and the Canon 1Ds, Mark III at 21.1 mp

The large format Seitz D3 mentioned above is unique in that it is a "scan" back type sensor similar to the method used for many years by digital scan backs used on 4x5 view cameras, but is 1) contained within a special panoramic medium format camera and 2) can take shots at 1/2000th second, much, much faster than the previous backs that took up to 45 seconds to scan one shot.

LINK:

http://www.roundshot.ch/xml_1/internet/de/application/d438/d925/f934.cfm




Powered by Yahoo! Answers