0.3 megapixel camera test image
robust185
at highest settings?
Answer
These are specs required:
Intel Processor-Core 2 Duo E6750 2.66GHz
AMD Processor-Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5800+
Nvidia Graphics Card-GeForce GTS 240
ATI Graphics Card-Radeon HD 3870
RAM (Memory)- 2 GB
Hard Disk Space- 9 GB
Direct X- 9
According to Sony you should have the following:
Sony Vaio F11 Specs:
Operating System Genuine Windows ® 7 Home Premium (64bit)
Architecture Intel ® PM55 Express Chipset
CPU Intel ® Core ⢠i5-520M Processor
Power and Performance with Intel ® Turbo Boost Technology
Processor Speed (GHz) 2,4
Max Turbo Boost Speed (GHz) 2,93
L2/L3 Cache (MB) 3
Number of Cores 2
Colour H: Gray, W: White
Memory Size (GB) 4 DDR3 SDRAM PC3-8500 1066MHz
Hard Drive:500GB Serial ATA,5400 rpm
Optical Drive Type Blu-ray Disc ⢠Player * BD ROM / DVD +-RW / +-R DL / RAM
Display Screen :16.4-inch,Resolution 1920 x 1080, Aspect ratio 16:9
Graphics Card:NVIDIA® GeForce® GT 330M GPU
USB Port:2 USB 2.0
Ethernet Type 10/100/1000Base-T (Gigabit)
Wireless LAN Type 802.11 a / b / g / n
Bluetooth
Camera 0.3 megapixels
Weight with Supplied Battery (Kg) 3.1
Warranty 2 Years
Now your ram is fine as well as your CPU but the Graphics card is a bit under, also note that the game isn't fully released yet. So specs can change from now till then, but people have played Crysis 2 with a crappier Graphics card then you in demo. So best shot would be to test the demo out on the laptop see how it runs, but personally doubt it will be smooth at highest setting possible. But it will be playable just at a lower setting is all :) hope this helped ya :D
These are specs required:
Intel Processor-Core 2 Duo E6750 2.66GHz
AMD Processor-Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 5800+
Nvidia Graphics Card-GeForce GTS 240
ATI Graphics Card-Radeon HD 3870
RAM (Memory)- 2 GB
Hard Disk Space- 9 GB
Direct X- 9
According to Sony you should have the following:
Sony Vaio F11 Specs:
Operating System Genuine Windows ® 7 Home Premium (64bit)
Architecture Intel ® PM55 Express Chipset
CPU Intel ® Core ⢠i5-520M Processor
Power and Performance with Intel ® Turbo Boost Technology
Processor Speed (GHz) 2,4
Max Turbo Boost Speed (GHz) 2,93
L2/L3 Cache (MB) 3
Number of Cores 2
Colour H: Gray, W: White
Memory Size (GB) 4 DDR3 SDRAM PC3-8500 1066MHz
Hard Drive:500GB Serial ATA,5400 rpm
Optical Drive Type Blu-ray Disc ⢠Player * BD ROM / DVD +-RW / +-R DL / RAM
Display Screen :16.4-inch,Resolution 1920 x 1080, Aspect ratio 16:9
Graphics Card:NVIDIA® GeForce® GT 330M GPU
USB Port:2 USB 2.0
Ethernet Type 10/100/1000Base-T (Gigabit)
Wireless LAN Type 802.11 a / b / g / n
Bluetooth
Camera 0.3 megapixels
Weight with Supplied Battery (Kg) 3.1
Warranty 2 Years
Now your ram is fine as well as your CPU but the Graphics card is a bit under, also note that the game isn't fully released yet. So specs can change from now till then, but people have played Crysis 2 with a crappier Graphics card then you in demo. So best shot would be to test the demo out on the laptop see how it runs, but personally doubt it will be smooth at highest setting possible. But it will be playable just at a lower setting is all :) hope this helped ya :D
Sprint HTC EVO and Samsung Epic?
Mr. Dick H
I want to know ALL the features that the Epic has and ALL the features that the EVO has. If both of them share the same ability, list it on both lists. Thanks.
Answer
Processor
Winner: Samsung Epic 4G
When it comes to power, neither phone is a slouch, but minor differences do manifest a marked gap between them. Samsung uses a 1GHz Hummingbird chip that shares a bloodline with the one used in the iPhone 4, while the EVO 4G uses a 1GHz Snapdragon processor. Which wins out when hummingbirds and dragons go to battle? The runty little bird powering the Epic. Check out AndroidCentralâs benchmark of the EVO 4G and Samsung Captivate (which has almost identical specs to the Epic 4G, but comes on AT&T) side by side. It averaged 55.1 fps to 42.9 fps in a gaming test, and turned in higher scores in the Neocore processing benchmark, as well.
Display
Winner: HTC EVO 4G
What might be the greyest area in our comparison comes down to a matter of preference. With a 4.3-inch LCD screen, the HTC EVO 4G has both immense size and sunlight-resistance in its favor. With a 4.0-inch OLED screen, the Samsung Epic 4G looks like a glittering gem beside its super-sized HTC counterpart⦠but fades to a dingy bluish gray the moment you bring it out into the sun. Resolution on both models is an identical 800 x 480. While movie fans might prefer the Epicâs brilliant color, weâre awarding this one to the EVO 4G based on practicality.
Camera
Winner: HTC EVO 4G
Weâve said it before and weâll say it again: Resolution does not make a camera. But in this case, the 8-megapixel camera in the EVO 4G really is a better shot than the 5-megapixel camera in the Epic 4G. Our test shots showed the Epic returning overly dark outdoor shots in comparison to the EVO 4G, even though they come closer to parity indoors. Small a difference as it makes, the EVO 4G also has a two LEDs for its flash, while the Epic gets only one.
Videoconferencing
Winner: HTC EVO 4G
Besides opening the door for faster Web surfing and services, the 4G connectivity has made it possible to make face-to-face videoconference calls without Wi-Fi. Both the EVO 4G and Epic 4G offer front-facing cameras to make it possible, but the EVO 4G once again outstacks the Epic 4G on resolution, offering 1.3 megapixels to its 0.3 megapixels (VGA). That said, it doesnât pose much of a practical difference, considering bandwidth requirements will crush video quality down to a blotchy mess anyway. Weâll hand this one to HTC for the tech specs â with a bright red asterisk that resolution matters even less than normal here.
Battery Life
Winner: Draw
The EVO 4G taught us that you donât go fast without burning a little gas to do it. The phone quickly earned a reputation for dismal battery life with heavy 4G use, and not surprisingly, HTC never posted official estimates for it. Funny thing: Neither has Samsung for the Epic 4G. While the manufacturers grin and shrug rather than delivering âofficialâ battery estimates, our unscientific testing yielded about six hours of on and off use on the EVO 4G, and the Epic 4G performed very similarly. No surprise, considering they both use 1500 mAh batteries. Chalk this one up to a draw.
Processor
Winner: Samsung Epic 4G
When it comes to power, neither phone is a slouch, but minor differences do manifest a marked gap between them. Samsung uses a 1GHz Hummingbird chip that shares a bloodline with the one used in the iPhone 4, while the EVO 4G uses a 1GHz Snapdragon processor. Which wins out when hummingbirds and dragons go to battle? The runty little bird powering the Epic. Check out AndroidCentralâs benchmark of the EVO 4G and Samsung Captivate (which has almost identical specs to the Epic 4G, but comes on AT&T) side by side. It averaged 55.1 fps to 42.9 fps in a gaming test, and turned in higher scores in the Neocore processing benchmark, as well.
Display
Winner: HTC EVO 4G
What might be the greyest area in our comparison comes down to a matter of preference. With a 4.3-inch LCD screen, the HTC EVO 4G has both immense size and sunlight-resistance in its favor. With a 4.0-inch OLED screen, the Samsung Epic 4G looks like a glittering gem beside its super-sized HTC counterpart⦠but fades to a dingy bluish gray the moment you bring it out into the sun. Resolution on both models is an identical 800 x 480. While movie fans might prefer the Epicâs brilliant color, weâre awarding this one to the EVO 4G based on practicality.
Camera
Winner: HTC EVO 4G
Weâve said it before and weâll say it again: Resolution does not make a camera. But in this case, the 8-megapixel camera in the EVO 4G really is a better shot than the 5-megapixel camera in the Epic 4G. Our test shots showed the Epic returning overly dark outdoor shots in comparison to the EVO 4G, even though they come closer to parity indoors. Small a difference as it makes, the EVO 4G also has a two LEDs for its flash, while the Epic gets only one.
Videoconferencing
Winner: HTC EVO 4G
Besides opening the door for faster Web surfing and services, the 4G connectivity has made it possible to make face-to-face videoconference calls without Wi-Fi. Both the EVO 4G and Epic 4G offer front-facing cameras to make it possible, but the EVO 4G once again outstacks the Epic 4G on resolution, offering 1.3 megapixels to its 0.3 megapixels (VGA). That said, it doesnât pose much of a practical difference, considering bandwidth requirements will crush video quality down to a blotchy mess anyway. Weâll hand this one to HTC for the tech specs â with a bright red asterisk that resolution matters even less than normal here.
Battery Life
Winner: Draw
The EVO 4G taught us that you donât go fast without burning a little gas to do it. The phone quickly earned a reputation for dismal battery life with heavy 4G use, and not surprisingly, HTC never posted official estimates for it. Funny thing: Neither has Samsung for the Epic 4G. While the manufacturers grin and shrug rather than delivering âofficialâ battery estimates, our unscientific testing yielded about six hours of on and off use on the EVO 4G, and the Epic 4G performed very similarly. No surprise, considering they both use 1500 mAh batteries. Chalk this one up to a draw.
Powered by Yahoo! Answers
Title Post: how will crysis 2 run on my sony vaio f11?
Rating: 92% based on 9788 ratings. 5 user reviews.
Author: Yukie
Thanks For Coming To My Blog
Rating: 92% based on 9788 ratings. 5 user reviews.
Author: Yukie
Thanks For Coming To My Blog
No comments:
Post a Comment