Showing posts with label 1.3 megapixel camera quality. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 1.3 megapixel camera quality. Show all posts

Sunday, May 4, 2014

my vga was better than my 1.3 megapixel camera???




Anunnaki


my vga camera on sharp gx15 was very good in quality compared to my new ericsson Z550i 1.3 megapixel camera. the new phone's pictures look very dirty full of dots everywhere even on the highest best quality. Can anybody tell me why this is? And also if picture quality does not depend on megapixels then how does a person determine which camera will be better?


Answer
Megapixel count determines the size of the photo and assures more colors. Hopefully more colors will lead to more realistic photos.

But a camera is also very dependent on the lens to produce breat photos. In fact, the lens is the more important part of the camera. In your case, it may not matter much because camera phones use cheap and tiny lenses.

For a digital camera, the third important element is the processing/cleaning engine. This is a firmware that cleans up the digital image to remove "noise" (i.e. grain, hot pixels or dots). The drawback in using a strong cleaning engine is that it reduces the details of the photo. I imagine that if you set your camera to the "highest" photo quality, the cleaning engine is almost switched off.

The problem with setting the camera to take the highest quality image is that it can be prone to a lot of noise. Try setting your phone to take medium or low quality and see if its comparable to the relatively low quality noiseless photo by your Sharp phone.

The number of megapixels assures a bigger photo, but the size and quality of the lens is more important, and nowadays, its a race for a better cleaning engine.

If you want good quality photos, you need a more expensive phone (or better yet, a real camera).

How much difference in photo quality is there between a VGA (640x480) vs. a 1.3 megapixel camera phone?




Aurora Bel


For instance the Nokia 6103 vs. the Samsung SGH-D807


Answer
Usually different brands do give different image capturing quality even if they are the same megapixel.

I have found that samsung pictures are very good, even though im a nokia/sony man myself.

However, the 2 qualities you talk about would be almost unnoticable on the phone screen, however when it comes to printing the quality especially with increased size would be more sharp from the 1.3 MP.

www.mobile-review.com usually has photo samples of each phone, so then you can compare :-)




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Wednesday, April 16, 2014

My 1.3 MegaPixel Camera....?




AladdinZan


I had a 5MP camera and it broke. It just stopped working for no reason.

So I started using a Photoclip 5 in 1 that I had years ago and shelved. It is fantastic. The photos are very very good quality and I am surprised - even when I am not using the full size pics.

How can this be so? Surely 5MP pics must be better, or is it the build quality of the camera?



Answer
Are you viewing these on your PC? If so than that would be the main reason. Resolutions beyond a MP or two generally only make a difference in print.

More than that though, and despite what the camera makers would have you believe, megapixels definitely aren't everything. The quality of the lens plays a big part as well. While it sounds a bit counterproductive for a camera maker to stick a sensor with higher resolution than the glass in front of it could resolve in the first place, this often the case. Detail destroying "noise" is another factor. Ironically as you increase the number of pixels, as a rule this also goes up. On many recent compact digitals it has gotten to the point where this noise is so severe that at best it completely cancels out any resolution benefit these cameras would otherwise have had!

How much difference in photo quality is there between a VGA (640x480) vs. a 1.3 megapixel camera phone?




Aurora Bel


For instance the Nokia 6103 vs. the Samsung SGH-D807


Answer
The difference in your example is in resolution (how many pixels are created), which is not the whole story on quality.

VGA = 640x480 = 307,200 pixels

1.3 MP = 1300x1000 =1,300,000 pixels

So the 1.3 MP phone is about 4 times more resolution than VGA. That will let you view and print bigger images than VGA without getting fuzzy. The pictures will look bigger on a computer screen.

But there is much more to quality than just size. The lens, the focusing mechanism, the color processing, etc., all contribute to whether you get a clear, naturally colored picture.

Even at 1.3 MP you will not get very good prints at the normal sizes. Most good digicams are at least 3 MP.

Good Luck




Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Saturday, February 1, 2014

What quality is a 1.3 megapixel camera like?




omg_shoes


I'm getting a new phone and I want good camera quality.
Can somebody show me what a 1.3 megapixel picture looks like?



Answer
Cameras in phones tend to produce poor quality images, especially when compared to digital cameras with the same resolution. Generally speaking a 1.3 megapixel image would be good for emailing and posting online.

When viewed on a monitor, the image would be a nice size and show detail without much distortion. Printed images would be different.

Megapixels refers to the size of an image, not the quality. The approximate size of a 1.3MP image would be 1280X1024 (in pixels), which is what many people use as their monitor resolution these days. Printed, it would only produce a print of about 3X5 inches before the image would start to look bad. Basically, the viewable size would be the same as your monitor screen, but the printed size would be much smaller. The real indicator of quality is PPI (DPI) which is the number of printable pixels per inch in a given image. Some 1.3MP cameras can produce images with 200 PPI while others only have 72 PPI. This is where the difference in viewed and printed images comes from. The lower the PPI, the lower the quality of the image. Most 1.3MP camera phones I know of only produce 72 PPI images.

Bear in mind that camera phones don't have a flash or any modes for taking pictures. The sensor and mechanism tend to be a one size fits all proposition which means many pictures don't fair well, especially if they are moving or in low light.

This camera phone would be a good choice for saving images to share online, but not so good for printing for a photo album.

My 1.3 MegaPixel Camera....?




AladdinZan


I had a 5MP camera and it broke. It just stopped working for no reason.

So I started using a Photoclip 5 in 1 that I had years ago and shelved. It is fantastic. The photos are very very good quality and I am surprised - even when I am not using the full size pics.

How can this be so? Surely 5MP pics must be better, or is it the build quality of the camera?



Answer
Are you viewing these on your PC? If so than that would be the main reason. Resolutions beyond a MP or two generally only make a difference in print.

More than that though, and despite what the camera makers would have you believe, megapixels definitely aren't everything. The quality of the lens plays a big part as well. While it sounds a bit counterproductive for a camera maker to stick a sensor with higher resolution than the glass in front of it could resolve in the first place, this often the case. Detail destroying "noise" is another factor. Ironically as you increase the number of pixels, as a rule this also goes up. On many recent compact digitals it has gotten to the point where this noise is so severe that at best it completely cancels out any resolution benefit these cameras would otherwise have had!




Powered by Yahoo! Answers