Good digital camera ?

amanda s

I am looking for a good digital camera which will take clear photos even if I had to sit in the cheap seats of an arena. Any Ideas? Big pro wrestling fan that needs a good camera just in case I ever get stuck up there.

Answer
Just saw this camera at Best Buy and think it is a great camera and a best buy. It has an optical viewfinder, image stabilizer, auto focus, and uses NiMH rechargeable batteries. Read as much of the following as you can for other information and help with choosing a camera.
Canon A590IS $149.99 at Best Buy store yesterday.
http://bountii.com/deal-1523871-canon-powershot-8-0-megapixel.html ...

There is no one particular place to get great buys, but you may see something above that really helps you find the best buy. Click on the link in the information above for an example then search for your camera of choice at the upper left. Camera prices at this link change often.

While most of the cameras out there are really good, I would choose Canon over Nikon because it seems like more camera for the money. Some would say Canon withholds their best technology for high end cameras and Nikon implements their best at all levels. Before you decide, read all the text and links in the information below because it will help you know what to look for in a camera.

There are so many cameras out there it is difficult to say which is best, but digital is definitely the way to go. The second source link will be very helpful as it list most of the cameras out there with prices. The following information should help you know what to look for in a camera.

What gives a camera its picture quality?
The short answer is that it is mostly the skill of the photographer that produces high quality pictures. The lens and camera are very important, but the ability to set the scene, adjust the cameras settings, and hold the camera very still or use a tripod with auto or remote shutter actuation when required is what gets the great pictures.

In new cameras, look for optical viewfinders (LCD invisible in bright sun) and check battery prices. High mega pixel settings take longer to process and may not be needed unless required for very large pictures or enlarging small parts of big pictures. Maximum print size for a 3 mega pixel setting is 8 x 10 inches.
http://www.kodak.com/eknec/PageQuerier.jhtml?pq-path=398&pq-locale=en_US&_requestid=2039 ...
http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/mpmyth.htm ...

Lots of great camera tips in these two links. http://www.danscamera.com/Learning/going_digital/#resolution ...
http://www.kodak.com/eknec/PageQuerier.jhtml?pq-path=38/10468/6368/333&pq-locale=en_US ...

Check this more for the money camera. FUJIFILM - FinePix 10.0-Megapixel Digital.
Life time Warranty (Parts & Labor).

Wide-angle shooting, a 12x optical zoom and picture stabilization mode combine in this camera for exceptional shooting performance, even at a distance. Plentiful scene modes, autofocus and automatic white balance controls make this camera a snap to operate. You may be able to find it on the Internet for a lower price.
http://www.bestbuy.com/site/olspage.jsp?skuId=8879234&type=product&productCategoryId=pcmcat152400050001&id=1212192673855 ...
http://www.digitalcamerareview.com/default.asp?newsID=3514&review=fuji+finepix+s1000 ...

This could be the best slim line camera with a viewfinder. It's PINK!
http://shopping.yahoo.com/p:Sony%20Cyber-shot%20DSC-W150%2FR%20Digital%20Camera:1995337750;_ylc=X3oDMTB0bjZzaWNuBF9TAzk2NjMyOTA3BHNlYwNmZWVkBHNsawNlbGVj ...
http://www.digitalcamerareview.com/default.asp?newsID=3462&review=sony+cybershot+w150 ...

The information about my camera is just to show that you don't need the biggest and best. Just know how to use the one you have.

My camera has 5.2 mega pixel, but I use 3 most of the time because it gives great results, is faster, and takes less memory. Also, it only has a 3 x optical zoom and 7 x digital zoom. I never use the digital zoom because making pictures larger works better on the computer. This is an old camera, but everyone is impressed with the quality pictures it takes ... like magic.

Check with the Geeks in several stores and compare prices. Ask what cameras they own, but don't believe everything you hear. Once you select a camera read all about it in the owner's manual. Just learned that my camera has red-eye prevention and correction. It also has adaptive lighting. You may be able to view owners manuals at this link, but will need to Login. http://www.retrevo.com/s/digital+camera ...

The source links will show most of the cameras out there with prices and help make your digital cameras work better.

Camera Question Is this a good camera please I need help on this? thanks?

:)

Someone who knows cameras could you tell me if this is a good camera


10 MEGA PIXEL DIGITAL VIDEO CAMERA

2.4" wide color screen with 32MB flash memory and 8x digital zoom. Includes USB cable and software and pouch.
It looks like this

http://img.alibaba.com/photo/51982631/6_6_Mega_Pixel_Digital_Video_Camera_with_rotatable_LCD_Display.jpg


I want to take video with sound!!! and photos thats pretty much it but i want the photos to come out good. I already heard that this camera is the best in the sun rather than at night which is fine ...
thats all i know.. about it ..

Answer
10 megapixels is more than most amateur photographers will ever need.

Most "point-and-shoot" cameras take excellent pictures with some limitations. The biggest problem is that the small lenses do not capture as much light as a single lense reflex (SLR) camera. The less light, the poorer the picture.

A 4 megapixel SLR will take better pics with a decent lense than a 10 megapixel point-and-shoot.

It all depends on what you're looking to do. For most people, point-and-shoot digital cameras are quite acceptable. And they're getting better all the time.

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Photography: Do cameras matter?

MR.Pie

From 2007, my dad purchased a Sony Alpha 100a. One of the first Sony DSLRs made.

From then, ive fell in love with photography. Today, I still use the same very 100a. I really want a Canon 7d, and etc, but its so over priced.

My question is, does cameras really matter? I feel like no matter what, it depends on the person, not the camera.

Answer
While the skill of the photographer is key, the quality and functionality of the camera plays a very big part.

Whether the camera is a twenty dollar point and shoot, or a three thousand dollar medium format film camera, the equipment still needs someone to set it up and operate it. A skilled photographer can take that cheap instrument and come up with some beautiful images and, a random four year old child might not get even ONE good image from that three thousand dollar camera.

But, here's the thing: Photographers, whether professional or amateur don't spend LOTS of money on equipment just because it costs more. They spend the money because the camera can DO more, and, in the hands of someone who knows how to use it, produces much better results. More expensive cameras have features thal allow greater flexibility in poor conditions, such as low light, bright light, fast motion or even slow subject motion. They will have features that can be added such as remote controls, interchangable lenses and, most important, GOOD quality, precision parts, including better lenses. (shop around and you will see that lenses actually cost more than most camera bodies)

This is true whether discussing film or digital cameras. I don't know the specific camera models you mention, but greater megapixels and screen resolutions mean better quality prints in large sizes. For some purposes, that may mean a LOT towards the ultimate use of the print. So, your term "over priced" is subjective. If your Sony Alpha is "good enough" for your purposes, then it makes no sense to spend any more money. But for someone who needs the capabilities of the Canon, it may make more sense to spend every dime of it.

Look at it this way, if you had never had access to your dad's Sony, would you be satisfied, today, with the same passion for photography, if you were using a one megapixel, off brand camera purchased at a truck stop convenience store or bait shop?

I want a new Camera? Preferably with a Remote!?

Sunshin

I want a new camera to film my youtube videos on and I would like a good quality one with a remote control. I don't have good editing software and thats why I want the remote. HELP!

Answer
The Canon Rebel T3i takes the consumer level dSLR a couple steps closer to the mid-level Canon 60D with the addition of the rotating rear LCD screen, remote flash firing, and in-camera processing features. The already highly competent, older Rebel T2i already shared many important features with the 60D (and even features of the semi-pro 7D) including the 18 MP sensor, 63-zone exposure metering system, high ISO performance, HD movie capabilities, and Digic 4 image processor. With these new upgrades, it might make it even more difficult to choose between them. But there are some important differences.

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

is a 1.3 megapixel camera better than a 2.0 megapixel camera? i'm talking about cell phone cameras?

Tiffany!

???
thanks for your help

Answer
I would expect a 2 megapixel camera to be better than a 1.3 megapixel camera given that everything else was equal.
however both are quite small. megapixels refers to the size / capacity of the image sensor... 1.2 million pixels ro 2 million pixels.. each pixel senses light in one colour..

its not just the size of the sensor that counts. the quality of the lens (this affects the amount of light let into the lens) the quality of the image processing hardware inside the camera/phone.

as a general rule a bigger sensor should be better, but I wouldn't be at all surprised if you could get a better engineered camera with a smaller sensor that will out perform a cheap as chips 2 mp camera.

ultimately if 'all' you are doing is taking photos of your mates then it doesn't really matter. it will matter if say you are taking holiday photos of objects a long way away, or if you want to print those images onto some paper. they will however work fine on any screen

if you wanted 'photographs' then you would know already that a 5Mp camera is around the smallest sensor to take general purpose images (images that can be manipulated or tinkered with as required). %mp is the basic size that you can get good quality A4 (10" x 8") images printed on

but if you want 'snaps' ie images that refresh your memory of the things you or you mates dis say on holiday then any camera.. the one thats to hand.. is the right camera

Which is better a 1.3 Megapixel Camera or a VGA Camera?

Q. i just wanna know which one of these are better cause this might decide which phone i get....

Answer
1.3 is much better than a vga camera the pictures on the 1.3 are really clear the vga pics althoughgood just are a bit more blurry

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

What is the world's smallest digital camera which still produces high quality pictures?

Reiner

Answer
Quality is such a subjective question. In order to get small size and maintain image quality, you need one key feature: autofocus.

Of course, it's a compromise. The smallest digital camera that takes decent pictures (much better than most camera phones, for instance) is the Sony DSC-U40. It's 2 megapixels and has an autofocus lens. It has no zoom, but that's sort of necessary given the size. It's 3.3 x 1.5 x 1 in.

If you want a zoom I'd recommend the Canon PowerShot SD30. By using a molded glass aspherical lens, they've made an incredibly compact 5 MP digital camera with a 2.6X zoom. It's only slightly larger and takes significantly better pictures. Size is 3.8 x 1.8 x .9 inches. See the attached link for a sample pic from the camera.

Im New To THe Digital World, Which Camera Do I Buy?

james k

my parents want a digital camera, they ask me which ones to buy but i tell them i dont know. i feel bad not knowing which brand or type of camera to get. all they want is a camera that doesn't blur, has the option to delete/erase pictures, and recorded unlimitedly, and has aLOT of memory. what do i need to know to buy a camera that has quality that meets my parents exspectations? this camera is not for me, i just want to make sure my parents gets the best and be satisfied and not getting ripped off. is there a camera thing that tells you how many pictures/videos it can hold? like for example an ipod. a 30gb can hold 7,500 songs max. is there a camera "GB" i should know about? and whats the most "camera GB"
there is? thanks. i know its a bit confusing. also, when you answer, i'd like to make a little request to put your answer in a way a 12 year old kid would understand. im a 16 year old tenth grader, and im kind of slow. its kind of sad i know. thanks for reading.
also, ive noticed in most digital cameras, you have to hold the button down and wait like 2 seconds before the camera takes its shot. is there such camera that takes pictures like disposalble cameras right when you press the button, but still have the option to delete the pictrures if you dont like it? thanks

Answer
There are MANY types of digital cameras out there. SLRs (large, but high quality pics), and ones that can easily slide into your pocket. The first thing your parents need to decide is what type they exactly want. Also, digital cameras tend to only come with enought memory built in to hold about 5 pictures. Nearly all need SD cards, which are essentially memory cards. They come in different amounts of storage. If your parents aren't real serious photographers, they certainly DO NOT want an SLR. You should be more experienced before you buy one of those. SLR's at their cheapest are about $700 for a decent one. You also need to know how much zoom you want, if any at all. The most common amount of zoom is 3x in a compact, smaller camera, though you can get 10x. One of the most important things when finding the right camera is the amount of megapixels. Megapixels are what determine the quality of the photo. The more megapixels, the better the picture. To get a nice looking image, you'd want 6 megapixels or more. Before buying a camera, do A LOT or research. You don't want to spend a ton of money on something that is going to junk out in a year or so. Once you've narrowed down your choices to a few cameras, go to the store and play around with them. Some may feel cheep even though they sounded good online.

I own a Panasonic TZ3 digital camera. It has a 10x zoom, and is a compact, not SLR. It has 7.2 megapixels. Panasonic also has a system called OIS. OIS allows the camera to be bouncing around and still take a non-blurry picture. You may want to look for a camera with that. My mother also has a Nikon D50 SLR. It is a fairly serious camera that I would not reccomend to beginners. Addressing your issue with cameras taking too long to take a picture, you need to look at the shutter speed when researching. The shutter speed is how fast the camera can take a picture. The less time, the faster. My Panasonic TZ3 can take pictures very quickly. Yahoo I.M. me if you have any more questions.

A good website for camera specs an reseach is dpreview.com

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Blackberry Curve or Bold?

hockeychic

which one is better?

if you can, add y or y not?

thanx!:)<3

Answer
Design:

Both are BlackBerry phones, and they look it. The traditional big screen, QWERTY keyboard and familiar trackball scroller are all present and correct, but with a 21st Century twist. The curved edges of the devices, the metallic detailing and faux-leather back of the Bold, the smaller dimensions all reflect the fact that BlackBerry has noticed competition has gotten cooler, and made both handsets look decidedly this season.

The BlackBerry Curve 8900 looks nothing like its named predecessors, stealing much of its style from the Bold. Coming in somewhat lighter at 110g (as opposed to 133g), and smaller in all respects at 109mm x 60mm x 13.5mm, the 8900 gives an even sleeker profile to an already elegant device without compromising keyboard size.

The Bold isnât much bigger, with the 114mm x 66mm x 14mm frame managing to straddle the line of being cool and straight-laced.

Screen:

Well, the BlackBerry Boldâs screen was a real watershed moment, being able to offer a multimedia experience comparable to other smartphones on the market for the first time. The 2.41â³ 480 x 320 TFT screen offered a resolution twice that of the old Curve devices, matching the iPhone in clarity if not size.

The Curve 8900 manages to beat the Boldâs landmark screen with a 2.44â³ 480 x 360 display, both larger and a higher resolution than before and making the handset even better for viewing pictures and movies, as well as remaining clear for reading of mail and viewing documents.

Camera:

Itâs impressive enough that this category exists at all for two BlackBerry phones, as the camera is a fairly recent addition to these previously business-driven devices. Nevertheless, the Boldâs (then) impressive 2 megapixel camera and LED flash has been superseded by the Curveâs 3.15 MP autofocus snapper. New additions like geo-tagging and image stabilisation make the 8900â²s camera more than an afterthought compared to the Boldâs slightly underwhelming offering.

Connectivity:

Ah. Something had to give in the specs of the otherwise saintly 8900. The BlackBerry Bold has this round sewn up with 3G connectivity over HSDPA at 3.6Mbps, and USB 2.0 support. The Curve, howeverâ¦doesnât. No 3G connectivity is easily a potential dealbreaker to those that like to surf the web, as crawling speeds and constant data charges with a 2G hook-up are a huge deterrent.

Also, the addition of a Microsoft document editor (as opposed to a viewer) makes the Bold 9000 a mobile office as opposed to a versatile smartphone, a small yet important difference.

The BlackBerry Bold definitely stands head and shoulders above in this category, as the choice for someone serious about being always connected.

Battery/Memory:

The Curve 8900 has a standby time of 356 hours and a talk time of 5 1/2 hours, contrasting the Boldâs slightly shorter 310 hours and talk time of 5 hours standby. Under the hood, plenty is going on with the Curve as it has an impressive up to 16GB microSDHC card support, as opposed to the Boldâs 8GB and 1GB in-built.

Verdict:

Whilst the two devices look very similar, the differences in the Curve 8900 and Bold 9000 become glaringly apparent when looking beneath the surface. BlackBerry might have come a long way, and features like a 3.5mm headphone jack and DivX video support highlight this. Nevertheless, the Bold is much more of a practical handset for the old guard of hardcore business users, whilst the new Curve 8900 shows the new casual direction of RIMâs devices.

The specifications for ancillary features like a camera and screen resolution are improved, yet the CPU of the 8900 runs much slower (520MHz vs. Boldâs 624MHz) and offers less of a core BlackBerry user experience than the older but wiser Bold.

The final choice is up to you, style or substance?

What a good blackberry?

Q. im planing to get a new phone but i dont know what to get and i was think about the new mytouch slide but im like how about a blackberry but i dont know what to choose oh yea i got tmobile please help

Answer
The RIM BlackBerry Tour 9630 boasts world-roaming capabilities as well as Bluetooth, GPS, and a 3.2-megapixel camera. The smartphone features a high-resolution display and an easy-to-use QWERTY keyboard. Sprint offers a number of services for the handset and it also supports BlackBerry App World.

Despite the lack of Wi-Fi, the RIM BlackBerry Tour 9630 is a feature-rich and well-performing smartphone that will serve Sprint's globe-trotting customers well.

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

How many megapixels does an iPhone 3GS have?

Adan

Answer
2 MP camera

IPhone 3GS replacement ? ?

Hayley

I have so many problems with this phone and will be getting rid next month.

Can anyone tell me a decent phone (apart from iPhone 4 and blackberry) that is any good?

I use it alot for taking pics, Internet, texts and calls.

Thank you!

Answer
Assuming your still staying with AT&T the best phones for your main uses (pics,web,text,and calls) are: 1) The Samsung Infuse http://www.samsung.com/us/mobile/cell-phones/SGH-I997ZKAATT

The reason I think this might be a good phone for you is because it is a 4g phone (HSPA+) which means quick web access and quick photo uploads. It also has an 8 Megapixel camera with LED flash, so you should be able to take pretty decent photos with this phone (a major step up from a iPhone 3GS). It also has a stunning display that should be excellent to text on. Call quality should be on par with most other smartphones in todays age. You can get a complete breakdown of its features in the link above.

My second option would be the Motorola Atrix http://www.motorola.com/Consumers/US-EN/Consumer-Product-and-Services/Mobile-Phones/Motorola-ATRIX-US-EN

The reason I recommend this phone is because it is 4g. So you will be able to have quick browsing. Not only that, but it has a dual core processor which should make it extremely fast. Texting should be no problem on this phone. It contains Swype http://swypeinc.com/product.html enabling you to text quickly. As far as the camera goes, the Motorola Atrix uses a 5 megapixel camera with LED flash. So pictures on this device should come out acceptable, just a few notches lower than the quality that the samsung infuse will produce.

Those would be the best options for you if you choose to stay with AT&T and you are not looking for anything made by apple or RIM.

If you are having trouble choosing which phone is better (Infuse or Atrix) check out this breakdown which lays out the key differences between the phones.
http://www.wirefly.com/learn/uncategorized/motorola-atrix-4g-vs-samsung-infuse-4g/

I hope this helps with your upcoming purchase!

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Why do camcorders have excellent optical zoom (40ish) but digital cameras do not (20ish)?

Adrian

Just wondering why Camcorders can zoom in farther than digital cameras...

Answer
Reason is because camcorders' sensor is far smaller than digital camera. The smaller the sensor the easier it is to design superzoom lens.

Compact caemra with 20ish-x zoom has sensor size of 1/2.33", while those higher end compact cameras with 5x zoom has 1/1.7".

Camcorder normally have 1/3" sensor to even 1/6" sensor. Very small.

Same goes to DSLR lens, with a much much larger sensor, a 3x zoom lens would be as big as a beer mug.

So it's all about the size.

help with picking first dslr?

lemon head

I currently have a nikon coolpix l110 - it is good but excellent for macro.
My dad has a canon rebel xsi I really like his.

*I already know how to handle a camera- I am just looking for a higher quality.

I plan on using this new dslr for events , portraits , landscapes & macro.
full hd is one thing it must have.

also besides what camera you recommend what lens do you recommend?
full hd video is what I meant * sorry

Answer
Since you are familiar with your dad's camera, how mug experience do you have with photography? Do you know what iso, f stops, etc mean? If not, get the Canon T3. If so, get the canon T2i

The T3 is one of, if not, the most popular entry level dslr. It has a 12.2 mp sensor, and full hd video capabilities. It has everything a beginner could possibly want.

The T2i is a great choice if you already know most of the basics because it allows for much better image quality with an 18mp camera. Either are great choices!

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

DSLR / Digital camera better picture?

JimboMatri

Hi i'm interested in buying a decent camera, which camera would take better pictures a 6 megapixel dslr or a 8 megapixel digital camera?
How much is the difference?

I'm looking at these two cameras Nikon D40 or a panasonic lumix dmc fz 18? Which one would you recommend?

Would there be a difference in time delay when taking a picture? Many thanks Jimbo the noob!

Answer
SLR vs. P&S

"Single Lens Reflex" means that the camera has only one lens (which is true for almost all

cameras these days anyhow) and the light follows a "reflex" or reflected path through the

lens, through the camera and up to the viewfinder where you look when you compose your

shot. Many years ago, there used to be a separate lens for the viewfinder and another one

for exposing the film. These were called "Twin Lens Reflex" cameras. Hence the

distinction of "SLR" came into being.

Today, an SLR still uses one lens for taking the picture, but the most important

distinction is that the lens can be removed from the camera so that you can interchange

lenses for different shooting situations, if you desire. For most casual photographers,

one general purpose zoom lens will suffice most of the time, but you have the option of

buying new lenses to give your camera different capabilities as your interests change.

A point-and-shoot (P&S) camera is set up so that you don't need to know much more than how

to aim the camera (the "point" part) and press the button (the "shoot" part). While you

can use pretty much any SLR in the same manner, this is almost the limit with many P&S

cameras. The user can exercise a little control if desired, but it's usually easier just

to stick to the automatic mode for 80-90% of your shots. P&S cameras do not have

interchangeable lenses.

P&S cameras are generally a lot smaller than SLR's and many of them are small enough to

fit into a shirt pocket with ease.

To ME, the major distinction between the two styles is the image quality. P&S cameras

have much smaller sensors, which is where the camera captures the light to make the image.

The larger the sensor, as a rule, the better the image quality. For a typical 4" x 6"

print of the entire shot, this doesn't make a whole lot of difference, but if you want to

make an enlargement of a portion of your picture, the SLR with its larger sensor will give

a much better result. Most P&S cameras have a sensor that is only about 4 mm x 5 mm. A

few have the larger 7 mm x 5 mm size. Most SLR sensors range from 14.8 mm x 22.2 mm to

15.5 mm x 23.6 mm. (There are some smaller and some larger, though.) This is about

10-to-20 times bigger than a P&S sensor.

Go here http://www.flickr.com/photos/samfeinstein/476181751/ and click on "All sizes" and

then "Original" to see the difference. Read the text for more explanation.

Do the same for this pair of shots:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/samfeinstein/1098666030/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/samfeinstein/1198936061/

The first one is taken with a Canon Powershot SD900, which is a pretty darn good camera by

P&S standards. The second one is taken with a Nikon D200, also a prety darn good camera

by SLR standards, but it could have been done with almost any other SLR out there with

similar results.

Same thing... If you view these in the original size (although they aer both cropped a

little bit), you will see that the noise reduction in the Canon point and shoot has really

kicked in and there is not really as much detail in the final image. You could make a

decent poster out of the DSLR image from the Nikon D300.
Canon SD950-IS: http://www.flickr.com/photos/samfeinstein/2224679165/
Nikon D300: http://www.flickr.com/photos/samfeinstein/2207013005/

Here's another comparison between two 12 MP cameras - one point and shoot and one DSLR:
Do the same for this pair of shots:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/samfeinstein/2373248772/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/samfeinstein/2372413161/

WIth an SLR, there is virtually ZERO delay between the time you press the shutter and the time the camera takes the picture. With a point and shoot, there is always some perceptable delay.

Get the D40.

Nikon D 90 VS Olympus pen?

lilmiss

Hi yall! Ok I dont plan to take on photography in the professional realm. I just want to take pictures of landscapes, portrait and just take pictures of city life. For a beginner (who also likes shooting videos) what would you savvy photographers recommend? Thanks a Million

Answer
i had used Nikon D90 DX 12.3MP Digital SLR Camera which is really good. it performs better.

* 12.3-megapixel DX-format CMOS imaging sensor
* 5.8x AF-S DX Nikkor 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR lens included
* D-Movie Mode; Cinematic 24fps HD with sound
* 3-inch super-density 920,000-dot color LCD monitor
* Capture images to SD/SDHC memory cards

http://www.amazon.com/Nikon-D90-Digital-18-105mm-3-5-5-6G/dp/B001ENOZY4/?tag=pntsa-20

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Sony DSC-W55 7.2-Megapixel Digital Camera?

ole4kaa

Buying this camera alone without additional memory sticks, how many pictures only can be stored? And how much will additional memory sticks would cost considering the diffrentiation of the memory space and what is the comparison between the Gbs and number of photos and price?

Answer
I have the DSC-W50 myself (which is 6 megapixel), but I think this generally applies to most cameras. It depends on the resolution pictures are taken at: a higher resolution results in fewer pictures, a lesser resolution produces more pictures.

As far as memory sticks go, larger memory sticks have the ability to store more pictures and, therefore, are more expensive. What it boils down to is: how frequently you use (or plan on using) your camera.

Camera???!!!???!!!???!!!?

Q. I was loooking at sony cameras...Preferably Touch...And I would like it to be a color not just silver or black......And under $200,PLease...But nothing used...But i will Take refurbished..Help please!!!!!!! Thankyou!!!!!!

Answer
i was googling and searched Sony DSC-W350 14.1MP Digital Camera which is in two different color.and also in your budget.

*26mm equivalent Carl Zeiss Vario-Tessar lens with 4x optical zoom
*Capture breathtaking images in Sweep Panorama Mode
*14.1-megapixel resolution; 2.7-inch LCD screen for easy viewing
*Capture your videos in HD Movie mode (720p); Optical SteadyShot image stabilization *reduces blur
*Accepts Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick PRO Duo/Memory Stick PRO-HG Duo

http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_ss_i_6_12?url=search-alias%3Delectronics&field-keywords=sony+cyber-shot+dsc-w350&x=0&y=0&sprefix=Sony+Cyber-s&ih=1_0_0_0_0_0_0_0_0_0.5947_1&fsc=-1&tag=pntsa-20

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Mobile Phones???????

NewYorker

im getting a new one for my 16th birthday next month, but there are so many and i have no idea which one to get.
if you could give me examples and i can look them up on the net to compare it would be really helpful =)

some of the features id like it to have:
- Camera
-Colour screen
- internet access
- probably a slide up??

there is no budget so tell me ANY!

thank you

Answer
Nokia n95 are excelent phones.

They have a 5 megapixel camera with flash and video rec.
Internet access(i even go on youtube)
Navigator so you will never be lost :)

It slides up both ways. ! side is the key pad and the other is its intergrated usic keys.

How is a 5-megapixels camera phone without flash in night ?

Wolf Best

I mean in normal night conditions,is it good or what ?

Answer
It will be very awful!

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Is a 18 megapixel video camera good for shooting quality short films?

TWB

Answer
Megapixels are used for measuring digital still image resolution, not video. Video resolution is measured using Horizontal line count and video quality is based on the amount of compression used.

Standard definition video = 480 horizontal lines.
High definition video = 720 or 1080 horizontal lines.

640 x 480 = standard definition video @ 4:3 aspect ratio = 307,200 pixels or about 0.3 megapixel.

1280 x 720 = high definition video @ 16:9 (widescreen) aspect ratio = 921,600 pixels or almost 1 megapixel.

1920 x 1080 = high definition video @ 16:9 (widescreen) aspect ratio = 2,073,600 pixels or about 2 megapixels.

The *QUALITY* of the video depends on the above AND the amount of compression applied to the video when it is captured and stored.

LOTS of compression = lots of discarded video data = lower video quality.
Less compression = less discarded video data and higher video quality.

Even "ultra high definition" video is referred to as "4k video".

Since we don't know which camera you have or what its video capabilities are, we have no way to know what sort of quality you'll get.

Tips:
1) Use LOTS of light when capturing video. Indoors, that means adding LOTS of light.

2) Use a tripod or other steadying device. Don't capture video handheld.

3) Don't expect good quality capture of REALLY LOUD or really low audio. Normal levels will be fine.

4) Get the camcorder close to where the people are speaking. If that is not possible, use an audio recorder (like a Zoom H1, or H2) and synch the audio later or use an external mic connected to the camcorder.

What to look for:

LARGE lens filter diameter (70mm or larger for your project.)
LARGE imaging chip system. 1/3 inch 3CCD or 1/3 inch 3CMOS.
Mic jack (XLR is best if using built-in audio capture)
Mics (wireless would be best - I like Sennheiser G3 with a portable base station - but they are pricey.)

is 3.2 megapixels video camera too bad quality?

Sara

Answer
Megapixels are used for measuring digital still image resolution.

Horizontal line count is used for measuring video resolution.
Standard definition video = 480 horizontal lines.
High definition video = 720 or 1080 horizontal lines.

640 x 480 = standard definition video @ 4:3 aspect ratio = 307,200 pixels or about 0.3 megapixel.

1280 x 720 = high definition video @ 16:9 (widescreen) aspect ratio = 921,600 pixels or almost 1 megapixel.

1920 x 1080 = high definition video @ 16:9 (widescreen) aspect ratio = 2,073,600 pixels or about 2 megapixels.

The *QUALITY* of the video depends on the above AND the amount of compression applied to the video when it is captured and stored.

LOTS of compression = lots of discarded video data = lower video quality.
Less compression = less discarded video data and higher video quality.

We don't know what video camera you are referring to. Technically, the 3.2 megapixel count video might be OK if the video compression is low.

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Blackberry Tour vs. Droid X vs. Iphone 4?

xquisite

So I currently have a blackberry tour (about a year old) and I have Verizon (which I haven't been very happy about), so my contract is over end of this month... and I was wondering if I should stick with Verizon and either keep my blackberry or get the Droid X? Or should I switch to at&t and get the Iphone 4?

Answer
i think you go with iphone 4
Video recording, HD (720p) up to 30 frames per second with audio
- 5-megapixel still camera
- VGA-quality photos and video at up to 30 frames per second with the front camera
- Retina display
- 3.5-inch (diagonal) widescreen Multi-Touch display
- Fingerprint-resistant oleophobic coating on front and back
- Support for display of multiple languages and characters simultaneously
http://rover.ebay.com/rover/1/711-53200-19255-0/1?ff3=4&pub=5574865779&toolid=10001&campid=5336440665&customid=partptl&mpre=http%3a%2f%2fshop.ebay.com%2fi.html%3f_nkw%3diphone%26_sacat%3d0%26_odkw%3dcheap%2biphone%26_osacat%3d0%26_trksid%3dp3286.c0.m270.l1313

The new iPhone 6?!?!?!?

Tina

My friends said " I'm gonna get the iPhone 6 when t comes out" but they nvr told me when it came out. So when does it come out?

Answer
The iPhone 6 is rumored to have a 12-megapixel sensor, up from the 8-megapixel version of the iPhone 5. It could be waterproof with a 4.8-inch Retina+ HD display with a 3D camera and fingerprint reader. Prices are being quoted bewteen $99 and $400.
For months, leaks, photographs and specifications have surfaced online. (See the alleged iPhone 6 photos.)
According to IBTimes, Apple is rumored to unveil the iPhone 6 simultaneously with the iPhone 5S at the September event to celebrate the public release date of iOS 7. The tech experts believe Apple will release the iPhone 5S on Sept. 20.
The iPhone 5S will have a new super HD camera/screen, a better battery, NFC, and "possible updates include an IGZO screen for Retina+ 128GB storage." The iPhone 5S is rumored to have internet speeds around ten times as fast as 3G.
It may also have a price of $199, just like the current iPhone 5, and have possible release dates of August, September, or October.
Rumors of a summer release for the iPhone 5S began in April this year when sources close to the electronics giant, including manufacturers, leaked details that production had started.
Apple has unveiled a new handset every year since it announced the first iPhone in 2007. More recent models, including the iPhone 4S and the iPhone 5, were announced in October 2011 and September 2012 respectively.
Despite earlier reports, Apple won't stop production of the iPhone 5 in addition to the iPhone 4 and 4S when the next model comes out.
Analysts at Goldman Sachs noted in their report this week that abandoning the iPhone 5 and all other previous iPhone models would be a major departure from Apple Inc.'s current strategy of keeping the older models around and selling them as low cost handsets.

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Were quality digital cameras readily available and affordable in 2001 - 2?

Insidious

The best digital camera I bought in 2005 and it was only $200 and took very sharp, clear, bright pictures.

This is the first time I remember seeing a digital camera that wasn't outrageously expensive that could dot his?

Were they available in 2001 or 2002?
How "good" is 5 mp on a 17 inch monitor?

Answer
Well, around 2002, I got a Sony Cybershot, which had a fixed lens (digital zoom only) and I think 1.9 megapixels. It took pretty decent pictures. I only paid around $200 for it. Today, I think my cameraphone takes far better pictures, except for lacking flash.

My brother got the first Canon Elph digital a little before that, as well as one of Sony's higher models. We laugh at the specs of these cameras today, but they were somewhat affordable (under $500) and took good quality pictures, just not good enough for 16 by 20 enlargements.

Nikon had introduced its D1 pro camera back in 1999, and the D1x in 2001. These pro SLR's brought newspapers into digital, but they remained too expensive for most amateurs and too low-resolution for most artists and photographers.

Digital was definitely accessible to everyone in 2001, it just wasn't yet compelling. It has been a progression since then, with quality increasing beyond relevance in terms of resolution, (nobody really needs more than 6 megapixels, and hardly anyone can even rationalize more than 12) and into practicality in terms of size, weight, speed, and light sensitivity. Most cameras made since 2006 have been very good, including cheap and simple buy-your-mother-for-Christmas kodaks.

Who makes the highest megapixel camera for HQ photographs out there ?

Lena

looking for the best out there.

Answer
I am going to do my best to answer this question in terms of reality. Basically, it doesn't matter how many megapixels your camera has! Too many of us are falling for the hype put out by camera companies wanting to sell newer, "better," bigger....and stress that "bigger is better." This may be true in some areas, but not in cameras.

Let's go back a bit to film....when we all used film, we knew that the film was all the same that we put into a camera.... Kodachrome, PanX, Ectachrome, Kodacolor, Agfa, etc....all the same film, with the ability to give all the same results...BUT ability and results were two very differnet things. The best of film ...the very best available to all of us...was the equivalent of 6 Megapixels !!!!!! BUT, using the same film in different cameras gave very different results! Why? Because of the camera (actually)... the LENS and how the shutters, light sensors, etc. worked. In those days, the ideal 35mm was considered the Nikon due to superior lens crafting and mechanics. Larger format film would give better results for enlargements (2X2" film would give better large prints because the pics had to be enlarged less for the same size print. 4X5" format was considered the Portrait camera .... no matter what the enlargement, grain would not be seen IF you were looking for grain. AND the 4X5" camera was used for news services, for its negative size was easy and fast to handle for news services. BUT, no matter how you looked at it, the FILM was the SAME....
Now we have digital, with up to 20+ megapixel ability...for what? I see cheap cameras out there advertising 12 Megapixels as if that is all that counts in your selection...NOT TRUE today as it was not true in the days of film....No one expected a professional finish from a Kodak Pony camera! The lenses were cheap.
Today, you cannot judge a camera by Megapixels, period! You have to consider what the lens is, who makes the camera (reputation), and how they make the camera.
In today's market, very few are willing to pay 5,000.00 for a camera body...other than professionals, and even then, the professionals will tell you it ain't the camera that takes the picture, it is the photographer. IF the photographer has a very fine tool, then the pictures will be very fine.
As in the past, probably Nikon stands out from the pack, followed closely with Canon (Canon has improved their lenses greatly, but they still are not Nikons. Nikon, to stay in business, produces cameras (SLR for the better photographers) from abut 500.00 to 6000.00 or so. Obviously there is going to be differences, but what do those differences mean to you? Probably nothing. A professional photographer can make a Nikon D40 sing! An amateur cannot take a really fine picture with the best of cameras...so it comes down to experience, finesse, what have you. Once you pass that 6 megapixel mark, it is the lens, the machine, and the user that makes the difference.
I suggest you go into a camera shop, try out camers...you will soon find that I am correct.
I own a Nikon D90 (superb camera), a Nikon D300S (over the top with features, and ability to handle difficult lighting) and a Canon point and shoot G-10 (they don't come finer than this little camera for what it is!

I hope this helps in what you are looking for. I hope Fotoace chimes in on this one. I suspect he will agree with me. I do not list a bunch of links here, for I doubt that anyone asking is going to check things out...and even then, it is opinion. I am comparing today's cameras with the finest of film, used for almost 1/2 century in its finest form.

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

DSLR Camera flash flickers and makes electrical noises...? Is this normal?

Brenda

I recently got a Canon T4i, and whenever I use the flash on auto, it flickers and makes an electrical sound that doesn't sound very pleasant. Should I bring it to a store to get it looked at or is this normal? I've used DSLRs before, but never encountered this issue.

Thanks!

Answer
dSLR cameras are auto-focus cameras.

When you are in low light, the camera uses an auto-focus assist lamp.

If you have the redeye reduction feature turned on, the flash will flicker before the shot it taken.

The electrical noises? Who knows?

Your really, really have to spend time reading your user manual

Best dslr camera????????????????

radonkeyko

I want to be able to take a picture like this http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-RXICxIhdkLA/Tg3cTXfEnEI/AAAAAAAA0gA/IlNlJlc34_k/s1600/Beautiful_eyes_7.jpg so whats the best type of camera that can capture an image like this and can also capture video?

Answer
Any of the entry level DSLRs would keep you happy for a few years. I'd pick either Canon or Nikon. I have a LOT of contact with other photographers and time and time again it seems that either one of those are most likely to make their owners happy.

The most important part is to buy only the best lenses - camera bodies get upgraded, lenses stay with us.
You WILL regret buying cheap lenses.
Don't rush into buying lenses. Start with a kit lens, get to know your camera, that lens, and all photographic principles.
Through time and through use, you will eventually KNOW what other lenses you'll need/want.
The more time you'll take, the less likely you are to regret your choices.

If you know anyone close to you with a camera, consider borrowing lenses and "picking their brain" about their camera and whatever else they know.

Go to a store and hold a few cameras, see how they feel to YOU.

Keep in mind that buying a DSLR isn't cheap, even if you find a good deal for body and kit lens.

You'll also want and/or need a few other things such as tripod, filters, a bag, sensor cleaning gear, a second battery, memory cards, perhaps a remote shutter release etc.

That's just the small stuff - I can guarantee you that you'll also want more and more lenses.
You'll also want a decent flash some day.

See how that list just goes on and on?
Owning a DSLR isn't cheap - at least not until you have built up a nice stash of gear.

Just some food for thought........

Do lots of research before you buy, and start learning about photography, too.
The very best thing you can do for your photography is to attend a class and read a few books and tutorials. Having some knowledge will make a huge difference to your images.
I hope I have expressed this idea clearly enough: YOU need to learn about photography because even the world's best camera will take lousy shots in the hands of someone who has no clue how to use it.

P.S. any DSLR can capture a photo like the one you linked to, provide you have the right macro lens for it, the right lighting and YOU know what you're doing.

About video: Many still cameras have video functions, and especially the DSLRs with video produce decent enough results. However, if video is important to you, you are MUCH better off with a camcorder.
At this point in time, they still do a much better job (and are much more user-friendly) at video and audio recording than still cameras can.

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Is there a dslr camera that can shoot high speed video?

Frank

Answer
NO

Not only are dSLR cameras still cameras with a video feature, the fastest frame rate is only 60 fps, twice the frame rate of NTSC video. High speed video runs closer to 1,000 fps and higher. Only special high speed cameras can do that for you and they are not inexpensive. Most people rent them when they need them

http://www.mctcameras.com/

what is the best DSLR camera for HD video 100-170$ ?

Silas

I am looking for A DSLR camera that shoots HD quality video for up to 180$ I see alot of lowpriced DSLR camera's at walmart, and Target, but what model is the best in that price range.

Answer
There is no "dSLR" at that price. Only "point & shoot" that looks like a dSLR. The lens is not changeable. Manual controls are more than a pocket point & shoot, less than a dSLR.

These cameras - and dSLRs and point & shoot are designed to capture still images. Video capture is a secondary "convenience feature". This does not mean they cannot capture good video - when used properly, they can - but they are not camcorders and cannot be treated like one. Prolonged video capture can cause the camera to overheat - and it takes a long time to cool down. Most record mono-audio.

Camcorders are designed for video capture - and as long as there is space on the memory card and power available, capturing video continues - and no issue with the camcorder overheating. Most also record stereo audio. Capturing still images a secondary "convenience feature". This does not mean they cannot capture good stills - when used properly, they can - but they are not dSLRs or bridge cameras or even point & shoot cameras and should not be treated like one.

When you get a tool for a specific application it is best to get it for its primary design purpose. When you get the tool for a secondary design, expect to use work-arounds or plan on having problems.

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

High Megapixel Cameras?

inquisitiv

i'm planning to buy a 14.1 MG camera from Canon. what is the negative and positive sides to high megapixeled cameras?
it's a small camera. just a regular digital camera with high MG.

Answer
Canon don't make a 14.1MP camera...but you may be talking about the recently announced ultra compact SD990 IS ( Ixus 980 IS) or the G10, instead (they both have 14.7MP).

Small cameras have small sensors and the SD990 IS and G10 have the same sized small sensor (1/1.7"). The main disadvantage of high MP on a small sensor is lots of noise.

But, they do feature Canon's latest Digic IV processor, so you really should wait until they have been released, tested and reviewed before you come to any sort of conclusion.

A 14.1MP camera will produce large image file sizes, so you need to make sure you use a fairly high capacity card and have plenty of hard drive space. For general use a 4GB SDHC card would suffice (high speed...something like Sandisk Extreme III).

But, what you really have to ask yourself is...do I REALLY need 14MP?

Some cameras dont produce good pictures, despite high megapixels. what's the best camera in terms of clarity?

mwas

the camera i got is 10 megapixels, and it produces dark faded pictures in broad daylight.

Answer
First tell us what camera you have.

Second call the help line and ask them to help you.

Dark, low colour saturation is a sign of under exposure ... your camera may need to re-set the camera at a minimum

Hopefully you have a camera from one of these companies:

Canon (800) OK-CANON
Casio (973) 361-5400
Fujifilm (800) 800-FUJI
Hewlett-Packard (HP) (800) 752-0900
Kodak (800) 235-6325
Leica (800) 222-0118
Nikon (800) NIKON-UX
Olympus (888) 553-4448
Panasonic (800) 211-PANA
Pentax (800) 877-0155
Samsung (800) SAMSUNG
Sigma (800) 896-6858
Sony (800) 222-SONY

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

What is the best canon lens for filming documentaries?

iya.george

I'm looking for a really sharp, fast lens that works well in low light conditions. It can't create a really shallow depth of field however as it would be too hard, the slightest movement would put it all out of focus so this rules out 85mm 1.2 :( however, I'd like a similar lens like that (possibly at half the price too) but that does all of the above! Also, do you recommend any other lenses in particular for filming documentaries (and general filming as I often make trailers etc) thanks!
Oops, yes, I meant a DSLR, I find them loads easier to control!

Answer
Filming requires you use a 16 mm or 35 mm motion picture camera, so this answer covers filming.

If on the other hand, you are calling using a dSLR with a video feature "filming" look further below

The lens you choose depends upon what is called for in the script.

I have used Leica, Nikkor and Canon lenses on various motion picture cameras that have "T" stops engraved on them and have been converted to fit the ARRI or other camera we were using.

Here is a site that rents production gear including motion picture and HD video cameras.

Rental lenses

http://www.birnsandsawyer.com/_camera-rentals/lenses/

Rental cameras

http://www.birnsandsawyer.com/_camera-rentals/16mm-cameras/

http://www.birnsandsawyer.com/_camera-rentals/35mm-cameras/

http://www.birnsandsawyer.com/_camera-rentals/hd-cameras/

As you can see, most camera rentals include a lens.

Answer 2:

Some of the shooting lenses used when using a dSLR to shoot video:

16-85 mm, 12-24 mm, 24 mm and 70-200 mm lenses

The larger that aperture and longer the lens, the easier it is to control selective depth of field.

Too assure critical focus, you will need something like this

http://www.markertek.com/LightBox.asp?b=HCKP&x=0

A camera for a music video ?

vileC

Ok so I want to get the cheapest camera possible with these specs

â¢25 FPS
â¢.48 KHz audio
â¢1920x1080 HD
â¢50 Mb/s bitrate

Haha I don't know these things and I got these of a website
Those are the requerments they give so I don't know if some of those are referring to the songs audio

I would really apreciate if someone could help me

Thanks a lot :D

Answer
There are cameras that fit your specs that are not camcorders but stills cameras that do video. Some examples are the Panasonic GH3, Canon 70D, Canon 6D, and the soon to be released Panasonic GH4 which does bit rates up to 200 mbps for 2k HD and 100 mpbs for 4k.

The cheapest of the cameras I mentioned is the Panasonic GH3 which costs just under $1,000 with no lenses included. It will do 50 mpbs and 72 mpbs. 50 mpbs is considered the minimum for broadcast standard video which is why you likely got this from the website.

All of the cameras I mentioned above are cheaper then camcorders that do the higher bit rates. Cameras like the Canon XF100 and XF300 do the 50 mpbs in camera but with much smaller sensors and the cost is closer to $3,000 - $5,000. The advantage of the camcorder is that you have a fixed lens and do not need to buy additional lenses but you can get a GH3 with some really good lenses for less money still.

You do not need to be obsessed with a the 50- mpbs mark though. As I have said above unless you budget is close to $2,000 you will not be able to touch that bit rate as easily. The GH3 may be under $1,000 but you will need to buy lenses and that will push your cost at or above $2,000. Major motion picture work has been done with DSLR's that only shoot 24 mpbs video. Visually you may not notice any difference between 24 and 50. The difference shows up more in post production where you have more room to edit video shot with higher bit rates and less compression.

If I was going to recommend a budget camera for this kind of work it would be the Panasonic G6. You can get it for less then $600 right now with a kit lens. If you have budget left over go out and rent some additional lenses for the video shoot. If you want the camera to do focusing for you pick lenses by Panasonic or Olympus. It is also a good idea to get lenses that an aperture at or below 2.8. This will help you get a more cinematic look as well give you more flexibility in shooting in low light. The other benefit of the G6 is that it does do 60 frames per second in full HD which allow for some slow motion photography which is often used in music videos.

As another poster mentioned music video audio is usually a copy of the recorded studio track that is put into the video in post production. You will however want to record in camera audio for syncing purposes if you are showing the performers singing the lyrics in the video. I would recommend the purchase of a shotgun microphone or the rental of one. My personal favorites are made by Rode but Sennheiser also makes some good ones. If you are doing a live track for your music video you will likely want to consider also buying or rental an external recorder like the Zoom H1 or H4.

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

RE: Canon Camera? +10?

Q. New questions always gets more answer.

______________


I'm turning 15 in December and Photography is my passion. I want a professional camera that is a Canon but I'm not sure what model should I get for BEGINNERS/STARTERS. I not only want the body alone, but i rather buy the whole set i guess? or however you say it. I want the lense along too. SD card can be bought separately. :]
Budget: 1k-2.5k
Thanks!
Tell me everything you know! would help!

Answer
Hey,

2500$ maximum for your first DSLR is..Awesome. But since you don't know a lot about them, every experienced photographer will recommend you to buy a good/not 2k body and a few great lenses.

I recommend you Canon EOS T1i, T2i, 60D, 7D and Nikon D3100, D5000, D90, D7000 and D300s.

T1i, T2i and D3100 and D5000 are smaller than the others I have listed. Out of these 4, T2i and D3100 win, with having lowest noise at high ISO and excellent quality.

The rest are all great, but since I dont know what you like to photographer, here's a real DSLR site:

Here's a post called 'Buying a DSLR, what's important, megapixels, features, brand, price, quality and which one to get - http://www.the-dslr-photographer.com/2009/03/which-dslr-to-buy.html

Good luck! There are many more tutorials, tips, buying guides (for lenses and memory cards etc) on that site.

Wanna buy a Dslr...................?

Agony Aunt

Hey All!

M a newbie in Dslr world..Plannin to buy Canon 450D in a time of one week as m goin on a Europe and UK tour!M just buyin it for a hobby..!

.But not sure abt d lense...Cud u guide me as to Which 1 shud i go for?Am i making a right choice buy selecting this model?

My budget is around INR 40,000 thats almost 813 USD.

Thanx!

Love,

Answer
Great Choice !!
For beginners to intermediates I suggest the Canon EOS Rebel model XSi. (Also known as the Canon 450D in Britain)The "kit" package comes with an 18-55mm zoom lens. The camera has pop-up flash, 12.2 Megapixels, and shutter speeds up to 1/4000th, 7 autoexposure modes, Shutter Priority, Aperature Priority and Programmed Modes. It also has a 3 inch LCD screen and numerous other great features found only on more expensive cameras. Wal-Mart is also selling them now for about $799. ...right at your budget level.
I bought one 6 months ago and absolutely love it. I have gotten some fantastic photos with it.

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Nikon or Canon DSLR Cameras?

Ali

I'm interested in buying a camera; I know that Nikon & Canon are probably the most common people own & I was wondering which is better/why its better or more preferred. In your opinion at least.


If I get one it will be $700 or less.
Just need your suggestions/opinions.
Thanks.

Answer
Both Nikon & Canon make great entry level DSLR's at under $700.
The Nikon D3100 has a guide mode for novice photographers and is capable of very high quality images.
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/nikond3100/
The Canon T3 is a great value and has great feature.
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canoneos1100D/

Both are capable and ready for your creative vision. The best one for you is the one that fits your hands and your style. Try both out in a camera shop before deciding. Check out the menus, the lenses, and how comfortable you feel "behind the wheel" of each. Also be aware that camera sales people (I used to be one) get points or perks for particular models or brands. Take their advice as advice, not gospel.

Now, I'm a Nikonian, and have been for 10 different SLR & DSLR's. Part of my loyalty is found in my huge investment in Nikon mount lenses. But I'm also a huge fan of their interfaces and design.

A Canon shooter can say similar things about their love/investment/choice. And we'd both be "right".

The most important opinion is your own.

I am looking to buy a VERY nice DSLR camera. Any ideas? Canon ? Nikon?

ihveaqstn

i enjoy taking pictures of people and landscape and close ups and everything!

it's just, i have no idea what camera to get!
i know they are expensive, and i want the camera that i spend loads of money on to be PERFECT and i want no regrets with buying it!

please tell me some good ones?




i have NEVER done anything with photgraphy, and i was hoping you could teach me everything.

my email is j_k_schultz@comcast.net

Answer
This is an old answer that I have not used for a while, but nothing has really come to the market in this price range...

The February 2007 issue of Popular Photography has an article where they compared the top 10 MP DSLR's. I took the scores and ranked the cameras similar to the way Formula 1 gives championship points. I just gave 5 for 1st place down to 1 for last place, splitting the difference when cameras tied in their catagories.

They evaluated Image Quality (giving this twice as much weight as anything else), Ease of Use, Control, and System Flexibility.

The final order and my scores are:

Nikon D80 - 17.5 points
- BEST in Image Quality, Control and System Flexibility
Canon Rebel XTi (400D) - 13.5 points
- Tied for best in System Flexibility
Pentax K10D - 11 points
- Tied for best in Ease of Use
Samsung GX10 - 11 points
- Tied for best in Ease of Use
Sony Alpha 100 - 7 points
- LAST in Image Quality, Ease of Use and System Flexibility."

Then again, this is the same magazine that put the Sony Alpha 100 dead last in this comparison named it the camera of the year in the previous issue! (In a follow-up to this seeming error, Pop Photo published the explanation that only the D80 and the Sony had been tested by the end-of-year deadline for choosing the Camera of the Year. Sony won on the strength of low price and built-in image stabilization. The other 3 that beat Sony in shoot-out were not tested until after the Camera of the Year was selected, because they were not yet available.)

Go to the original question and read the responses for more opinions.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AiG00eHyd0oq5b.X7J.jiULzy6IX?qid=20070113133139AAHWJY0

If you want to get the "best" for the real world, consider the Nikon D200 or Canon 30D if you can afford it. For about $300-500 less, look at the results of the recent PopPhoto test and choose from that list according to your taste.

Personally, I use a Nikon D200 and would recommend it without hesitation to someone who has some knowledge of photography. For someone who wants the "best," but is starting with somewhat of an "entry level" knowledge base, I'd suggest the Nikon D80.

There are people out there who will state their preference for the Canon cameras and I will not argue with them. The Canon 30D and 400D are excellent cameras as well. You would have to visit a camera store or camera department and pick them up and see what you think.

This article is available online at:

http://www.popphoto.com/cameras/3569/10mp-dslr-shootout.html

Here's another reference from outside the photographic press. Consumer reports compared the Nikon D80, Canon Rebel XTi and Sony Alpha. Personally, I'd say that the Nikon came out on top here, also. It beats the Sony in "noise-free ISO" with an acceptable rating at ISO 1600 (kind of optimistic, I think...) compared to the Sony's ISO 400. It beats the Canon (in my opinion) by having a spot meter that the Canon does not offer.

http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/electronics-computers/news-electronics-computers/november-2006/shootout-10-megapixel-digital-slr-cameras-11-06/overview/0611_digital-slr-shoot-out.htm

Here's another comparison of interest:

http://www.digitalcamerainfo.com/content/Canon-Rebel-XTi-vs-Nikon-D80-vs-Sony-Alpha-A100-Head-to-Head-to-Head-Digital-Camera-Review-.htm
[Note the navigation menu near the top of the review]

The next thing to consider is what lens to start with and where you go from there. If you are new to this, I'd say to just get the "kit" lens, which seems to be the 18-135 lens for the D80, and get started. Once you know where you really want to go with your photography, Nikon has an almost unlimited family of lenses to choose from.
~~~
See XTi, D40, D40x, XT, D80,: http://www.popphoto.com/cameras/4584/top-selling-digital-slrs-for-july.html

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

can i connect my computer with a cctv camera?

Answer
The simplest process is to buy a network IP camera. This is the camera you can connect to your PC network card using RJ45 plug or to your network switch or router.

You can buy any cheap model from AXIS(my first camera was AXIS, I like them very much), Arecont Vision, Panasonic, Sony, Trendnet (cheapest of the list).

Network IP cameras are modern. The only disadvantage - they are more expensive in compare with traditional analogue CCTV cameras.

If you purchased analogue CCTV camera, you can connect it to your PC using 2 ways:
- buy DVR card (old way, i would not go this way)
- buy an ip video server or video encoder l(like AXIS M7001, quite good for its price, see here: http://www.axis.com/products/cam_m7001/ or AXIS 240Q if you need to connect 4 cameras).

To choose a camera with proper lens (lens with different focal length have different angle of view), camera locations as well to choose your compression for HDD you have you can use IP Video System Design Tool from http://www.jvsg.com or special online calculators.

If you need high resolution camera (like 1-4 Megapixel) go for network camera. Also if you need to watch high speed objects, choose a camera with progressive scan.

If you build a network CCTV system you need to run some software on your PC. The list (a little bit outdated) of not too expensive software is on http://www.video-home-surveillance.com . Also you can have a look on forums networkcamerareviews.com or cctvforum.com to see what other people use.

Which Camera is good for Landscape photography?

whatapwrtr

I have never had anything better than a 100$ digi cam to take photos with. But photography has always been a dream of mine. I want a camera in the 300 - 1000$ range that would be good to take pictures of...well everything but mainly landscape.

The problem is that I dont know which type of model to get. Should I get a dSLR? How good are superzoom cameras? Please help! Now that I finally have money for a cam, i cant wait to get one.

Answer
For the best images a DSLR should be what you're looking for. You want a large sensor for better detail and color. However, the lens used really matters since landscapes are usually done with a wide-angle lens. Another item I consider mandatory for landscape photography is a good solid tripod.

With a basic DSLR like the Sony A580 or Pentax K-r or Canon T3 or Nikon D3100 you'll get an 18-55mm zoom lens. Although 18mm isn't as wide as some people might like its still suitable for making good landscape pictures. The trick is in knowing how.

One of the first things you need to learn about is Depth of Field (DOF). Landscapes require a deep DOF so that everything from the foreground to infinity is in focus, especially since its always a good idea to have something of interest in the foreground. There are only three factors that affect your DOF:

1) The focal length of the lens.
2) The f-stop used.
3) The subject distance.

These sites will help you learn about DOF and how to control it:

1) http://www.dofmaster.com/dofjs.html
2) http://www.kamerasimulator.se/eng/?page_id=2
3) http://www.illustratedphotography.com/photography-tips/basic

At Site 1 you can use the DOF Calculator to compute your DOF using any combination of the three factors imaginable. With a Sony, Pentax or Nikon DSLR and using the 18mm end of your zoom you can achieve a very deep DOF. Here's how:

Set the aperture to f16 and focus on a subject at 5 feet away. Lock the focus.Your DOF will be from 2'-0'' to infinity so anything 2'-0'' in front of your camera to as far as you can see - infinity - will be in focus. Now find a worthy scene and look for something of interest like a piece of driftwood or some flowers - anything you find interesting. Remember to use the Rule of Thirds though. Now as long as you stay a little more than 2'-0'' away from your object of interest it will be in focus as will everything behind it.

Additional tips:

1) Always shoot at your camera's highest resolution. You paid for those megapixels so use them.
2) Use ISO 100.
3) Have your camera on a tripod.
4) Shoot in Aperture Priority. Your goal is to control your DOF so shooting in Aperture Priority allows you to do that.
5) Use the camera's self-timer to release the shutter.

These were made with a vintage 35mm film camera:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/drifter45h/3982233634/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/drifter45h/4032748624/

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

what is the best dslr camera for a beginner photographer to buy?

Kirsty Str

i have a simple point and shoot camera just now and want to buy a dslr. i want to know what the best dslr for beginners is and it has to be under £300 as this is my budget. thanks :)

Answer
Any dSLR is good for a beginner, whether it is an old used Nikon D100 (2002 -- under £180 on UK eBay) or a top of the line Hasselblad H4D40 (£15,900).

You see, ALL fully adjustable cameras work the same, so it really does NOT matter how much you pay for them. It is up to you to learn how to use three controls to produce the best exposure; shutter speed, lens aperture and ISO setting. ANY fully adjustable camera has those settings.

Finding a dSLR anywhere new for under £300 may be problematic.

Look at the Nikon D3100 or Canon 500D and then once you decide which you want (by visiting a camera shop and testing both of them in your hands), start saving your pennies

Whatâs a nice camera to start out with for an upcoming photographer?

g

Hi, I would love to one day become a photographer. Maybe not as my dominant career, but something more like a passion or hobby. Iâm currently an undergraduate studying psychology with hopes of one day becoming a college professor or following some career path in the field of psychology. I purchased a cell phone a few months ago, and I love taking photos with it. I take photos of everything. The sky, trees, landscapes, grass, puddles, flowers, insects, animals, lakes, miscellaneous objects, people, bridges, traffic, houses, cars, etc. I would love to have a much better camera, though, to capture it all.
Any recommendations for a nice camera or what I should look for when choosing a camera? My current budget is around $500. I apologize for having such a low budget, but thatâs all I have as of right now. I would love if you were able to recommend a nice camera thatâs even cheaper than my budget, but if not, thatâs okay too. Thank you.

Answer
However having bought and used several DSLRs and Hybrid/Mirrorless Cameras over last 2-3 years, I can say that all modern day DSLRs or Mirrorless are very capable cameras. You won't go wrong buying anyone of them.
However if you want to buy the best your $500 can buy, I would say buy Pentax K-01. As most people use Nikon or Canon, most of them would tell you to buy a Canon or a Nikon. However having used them too, I can say Pentax K-01 will be best value for you. Currently, Pentax K-01 are being cleared out. They were being sold for around $900 last year but company's gamble with body design didn't work well so now Pentax is clearing them out around $400. At this cost, this is the best deal out there. This camera has better image quality than any Canon or Nikon under $1000. The lens that it comes with is also high quality and would do nice low light or indoor videos. Pentax has stopped making them and once the current stock goes away, the opportunity will also go away to own a great camera for under $500. With Pentax, you can use any of their old lenses on K-01 and this camera offers nice features for manual shooting. Besides that, K-01 offers more features then entry level Nikon, Canon or Sony DSLRs.
Check specs and reviews on Amazon:
http://www.amazon.com/s?ie=UTF8&tag=amznsearch.ms-20&index=aps&link%5Fcode=qs&field-keywords=k-01&tag=bookrevi02-20

Whichever camera you decide to buy, here are some Tips to get the best out of your first DSLR.

1) Read photography blogs or tips online to be a better photographer. Any camera can do only limited things but with some tips, you will be able to take your camera to the next level. You will have better chances for better photos.
2) Buy some prime fast lens like 35mm or 50mm with F1.8 or so. For Canon or Nikon, you can get one for around $100-$150. For Pentax, you can use a Super Takumar 50mm F1.4 for around $100- one of the best lenses ever made. With these lenses, your DSLR will be able to take photos in low light too. Plus for taking photos for people and pets, they give nice bokeh- background blurring that you see in portraits taken by professionals.
3) Read your camera manual. You will be amazed to know how much your camera can do besides that AUTO button.
4) Work with your camera. Your camera can do only certain things for you. When you are taking a photo, it tries to guess what it is shooting and would set up Aperture, Shutterspeed, ISO, color mode etc to shoot a photo for you. Many times that piece of glass (I mean lens) and that sensor does not know that you shooting in backlight or in snow. It does not kow if you are taking photo outside in broad sunlight or indoor well-lit place. If camera does not know accurately what it is shooting, it will probably give you a bad photo. Now instead of blaming your camera for a bad photo, if you are willing to work with your camera, your camera can take better photos for you. Learn some basic photography tips and help out your camera when it struggles. Set a proper mode like Portrait, Landscape, Macro, Sports and tell your camera where and what you are shooting. If you camera takes too bright or too dark photos, set the Exposure Compensation and tell camera to take less or more light. With your little help, you and your camera can make a great pair and together you will be able to take better photos.

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

I need help finding a DSLR camera!?

Michael

Hi guys. I am looking for a DSLR camera that has 1080p 60fps video recording capability. ISO range is between 100 - 6400 at least. My budget is under $1000. A compact DSLR is fine as well. Thanks!

Answer
There are no DSLRs with 1080p with 60fps. I would definitely recommend the Nikon D7000. Alot of people are suggesting Canon Rebel T3i here but trust me there are alot of reasons why you should consider D7000 instead. I'll list them for you;

--Significantly lower noise at high ISO
--Much better image quality
--Many more focus points
--Much more dynamic range
--Much better color depth
--Much larger viewfinder
--Much longer battery life
--Many more cross-type focus points
--Continuous video focus
--Much less startup delay
--Much better viewfinder coverage
--Video autofocus
--Shoots faster
--Has a pentaprism viewfinder
--Larger sensor
--Less shutter lag
--Weather sealed
--Has more storage slots
--Better boost ISO
--Much faster max shutter speed
--Slightly more lenses available
--Slightly thinner

I believe when one is spending such a huge sum of money all these things must be considered. Both are absolutely great brands but particularly among these two cameras, Nikon wins. I suggest you read this detailed review to get into the details of this camera:

http://amzn.to/qOfuc6

I've looked around and this is the best price i could find for it:

http://amzn.to/nIEbNN

Best of luck. Hope i helped. :)

Which nikon digital camera is better?

Grecia Sal

I really want to get a new (expensive) digital camera. You don't even know how many cheap cameras i've gone through out my life. I want higher quality pictures. I travel (not all the time but frequently). I would luke to capture some memorable memories in HD. Lol i don't really want an over the top expensive director/photographer kind of camera but I want the Nikon J1. I like its physical apearance and buying it won't hurt my wallet that much. But i want to know if its a, not just good but, great camera for what i want. Whats the difference between the J1 and J2? Which one's better? And thanks for your answer, i will appreciate it greatly

Answer
The quality of the Nikon 1 series falls somewhere between a DSLR and Compact camera. It is an intermediate camera I suppose, and the sensor size is also between a DSLR and Compact.

Some people have bad things to say about the Nikon 1, but you will usually find they have never used one, so they are relying on internet lore to base their opinion on. If you look at the DxOMark ratings, this camera is on par with most of the M4/3 cameras, which is quite a feat given the camera's sensor is slightly smaller (but then again, Canon APS DSLRs have smaller sensors than Nikon DSLRs do - an no one complains about that).

I own a Nikon V1, and it is a really good camera for the price I paid for it ($299 last Dec). While I would never have paid the MSRP of $899, which I agree was over priced - $299 was cheap enough for me to try it. And I am glad I did. I own a couple of Nikon DSLRs, and the V1 is a backup for them.

The fast focusing of the Nikon 1 is faster than most, if not all DSLRs. And with the incredible 60fps continuous shutter (notwithstanding whether or not you need such a feature) is not found on any other camera.

The worst performance aspect of the Nikon 1 is the low light capability - but it is average; better than a compact camera, but not as good as a DSLR.

While the V1 is no longer available, the V2 is the current camera.

There is not a lot of difference between the J1 and J2, so I would pick the least expensive of the two - you will not notice any difference. Basically, the J2 was just a minor update to the J1. The J3 however is a different camera, and has a higher megapixel count, and the anti-aliasing filter has been removed - to improve sharpness.

Even then, out of all of the currently available cameras, I like the V2 the best as it has an electronic viewfinder. This means you can hold onto the camera close to your face, and support it better. Having to hold a camera at arm's length just introduces blur due to your inability to hold the camera steady.

I do have to make one thing known though. You are paying a premium for the compact size of the Nikon 1 - as you are with any of it's competitors; M4/3, NEX, etc. That premium is in the form of the convenience of a small package. Once you buy several lenses (they are all interchangeable cameras), they are not any less expensive than a DSLR, and a DSLR is going to be better.

You can easily spend over $1,000 after you buy a few lenses.

If you are looking at buying one of the Nikon 1 cameras, understand they come with a 10-30mm kit lens. Other lenses are available. One of the more popular lenses is the 30-110mm, which combined with the 10-30mm, gives you a respectable 11x of coverage.

However, the 30-110mm lens is $250, and they are in short supply due to high demand. My advice, if you decide to buy a Nikon 1, is to look for the 2 lens kit - which includes both the 10-30mm and the 30-110mm lens. The 2 lens kit is only $100 more - so you end up saving $150 vs. buying the second lens separately.

And if you buy a camera in one of the colors other than White or Black, you can only get a matching color 30-110mm lens in the 2 lens kit. This I think was done so retailers don't have to stock 6 different colors for each lens.

Powered by Yahoo! Answers