What's the Highest Megapixel Camera in the World?: 2014-02-23

Home » Archives for 2014-02-23

Saturday, March 1, 2014

highest megapixel camera....?

somerandom

what is the highest megapixel camera available at the moment
and what price is it at?
im not looking at buying a camera
its part of an essay for IT that i'm doing
and also could the prices be in Australian dollars

Answer
Fermilab's 500 megapixel digital camera

http://www.engadget.com/2004/05/27/fermilabs-500-megapixel-digital-camera/

high zoom/high megapixel camera?

Traveler

I am trying to find a small point and shoot camera with high megapixels (at least 12.0) and high zoom (at least 10x). I have been looking for one for a while now and the best one that i have found is the canon PowerShot SX210IS camera. (but this camera had mostly bad reviews about the placement of the zoom bar.) I do not want a cheaply made camera! i would prefer that the camera takes AA batteries but a battery pack is fine, i have no price range but would like to try to keep it under $500.. thanks***

Answer
I would suggestion these good cameras that have a good zoom and use an AA batteries :

Canon PowerShot SX20IS : 12.1MP, High-powered 20x wide-angle optical zoom, 2.5-inch Vari-Angle System LCD, DIGIC 4 Image Processor, Capture 720p HD movies with stereo sound
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B002LITT3I?ie=UTF8&tag=20908-20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B002LITT3I

Nikon Coolpix L110 : 12.1 MP, 15x Optical Vibration Reduction (VR) Zoom, 3.0-Inch LCD, HD Movie (720p) with stereo sound, 5-way VR Image Stabilization System, Sport Continuous Mode, Intelligent automation contributes to carefree shooting
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0034XIMG4?ie=UTF8&tag=20908-20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B0034XIMG4

Fujifilm FinePix S1800 : 12.2 MP, 18x Wide Angle Optical Zoom, 3-Inch LCD, Dual Image Stabilization, Capture movies in HD quality 720p resolution, Tracking Auto Focus
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0035JD0DW?ie=UTF8&tag=20908-20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B0035JD0DW

Kodak EasyShare Z981 : 14MP, 26x Wide Angle Optical Image Stabilized Zoom, 3.0 Inch LCD, One-button upload to YouTube - Facebook - Flickr and Kodak Gallery sites plus e-mail, HD video capture
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0031RGGFM?ie=UTF8&tag=20908-20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=B0031RGGFM

Other good Power zoom cameras that use an AA batteries : Fujifilm FinePix HS10, Fujifilm FinePix S2550.

Hope this help.

What is the different between a regular point and shoot camera and an advanced one?

Kerri : )

& no i'm not talking about a DSLR, I'm talking about an advanced point and shoot

Answer
control

On an advanced one you can set Apperture/Exposure Time and have access to more settings. Also usually the lens is of better quality and overall it is just naturally the better choicel

But it mainly control, being able to make the picture as YOU want it. On most compacts it is push a button and voila picture. But all automatic! On an advanced model you can say "Keep the apperture wide" for that portrait effect.

There is nothing wrong with things going automatic and in 90% of the cases it makes very decent choices. But sometimes you need control you need to say the camera what to do.

As they say on a sunny day every camera performs without trouble. But when the going gets though, it gets dark or you have to catch movement. Maybe your pet is doing cute things and well it isn't as if the cage is standing outside in the sun. Well then automatic modes can become a bit confused! Trust me how many times I haven't gotten the metal bars on the picture instead of the rat. The auto focus just didn't make it.

So really it is control.

How do I shoot photos through the fence/gate/cages at the zoo?

Serabi

I have a Canon EOS Rebel XS and I just enrolled in a photography class in college. I thought the zoo would be a great place to start, but when I see the Big Cats, they're enclosed in large cages and I cannot figure out how to keep the chain links out of the photo. Is there a certain setting that the camera needs to be on or something? Or is the camera itself not well enough of a quality?

Any recommendations would be appreciated...even if you suggest that I should try a different DSLR, filter, lens, etc.

Answer
Put your camera on manual focus and use a fairly large aperture, like f/4 or f/2.8. Focus on the cat and the fence will fuzz out of focus a bit. It won't magically become invisible, but maybe it will be enough.

Which Semi Pro video camera should I buy?

sprattoo

I am getting lost shopping for video cameras. I need external microphone inputs, would like to be able to use headphones, would like video outputs for Jib use. I would like to be able to film in HD, and I really like the idea of filming to SD cards or HDD instead of using mini DV tapes.
My Budget is something under $2,000.
I will be using the cam for short films, commercials, Live DJ / video presentations.
any suggestions?

Answer
"DJ"=Loud audio=lots of vibration. Hard disk drive (HDD) camcorders should not be on your short list. They can stop recording because the HDD heads are protecting the platters and can stop recording under high vibration levels.

ALL camcorders have AV out connectivity so you can connect to a remote/external monitor for jib/crane use.

A prosumer cam will have a stereo 1/8" (3.5mm) audio input AND manual audio control. You can add an XLR adapter for use of XLR mics. BeachTek or juicedLink.

Given the pro-level requirements, you must have low compression video file capture. This means - for high definition - HDV, DVCPRO HD, HDCAM or XDCAM. No AVCHD.

DJ=low light=camcorder needs large lenses and large 3CCD or 3CMOS imaging chip system to capture video under low light conditions.

The only cam that comes close is the Sony HDR-FX7. but it will not meet the low light requirements. The HDR-FX1000 will meet all the technical requirements but is miniDV tape and outside your budget. JVC GY-HM100 is flash memory saves to h.264 MOV files but is outside your budget.

You need to reduce your requirements or increase your budget... Or investigate the lower end of the dSLR (those able to also capture high definition video) area and separate audio capture system.

Best possible beginners camera kit for $1000?

Doug

Ok so recently I have convinced my dad to finally let me do some filming for his company. I recently broke into the world of cinematography and video production, in which I am very interested. So I know just a good brief idea of filming. The kind of filming I will be doing is interior and exterior footage of homes. My dad is a general contractor so he basically does remodeling and renovations for his clients. The thing i'm trying to do is put videos of finished projects he has done and showcase it on his website so that potential clients will see his "amazing" work. The emphasis of that word "amazing" is implying that I will do shots of the homes after they are finished being fixed and remodeled. I am not nessesarialy talking about photoshopping the video, but rather adding filters and editing shots together into a final video. My goal is to make a good impression on his future clients and do "good" work on filming and editing. I know that for camera you can get a DSLR for around $500 or a HD CamCorder for around $200. But is there something better camera than a DSLR or HD CamCorder that will leave me some more money in my $1000 dollar budget for other equipment? Also, what kind of equipment am I going to need for this kind of work. Is a camera and tripod good enough? Or is there more I should include in my $1000 budget like extra stabilizers, steadicams, camera dollies (with or without tracks), camera filters, camera accessories, etc? As far as video quality, my goal is to get the same quality image/video footage like in HGTV's show Selling New York, or BravoTV's Million Dollar Listing New York. The way they show the homes and apartments is very appealing to me, also the way they have these video affect like time lapse footage and special camera techniques with dollies, jibs, and cranes. My other goal is when I start into my planned real estate broker/agent career, is to showcase homes very excellent and impress buyers and sellers. Of course that is a long time from now, so in the meanwhile I will start with this project. Remember that my budget is $1000, maybe a bit more over. I will owning this camera essentially, adding to equipment and such with time. But for now its around $1000.

Answer
Hi Doug:

First, get out of your head that âfor $1000 or soâ you'll compete with the "look" of major cable network shows like "Million Dollar Listing" or "Selling New York", which have easily $250,000-$500,000 in camera, lighting, sound, & editing gear, not to mention tons more expertise and crew members than you'll ever dream of.

This isn't to say that you can't duplicate good-looking shots, with proper knowledge, training, practice/experience on your own, with a single camera & tripod (and perhaps a home-made mini-jib or "slider" mount to simulate dolly & crane moves) and simple lighting techniques.

If web viewing on your dad's site is your ultimate goal for the home remodeling showcase "footage", my initial recommendation is just to shoot good still photos, with a DSLR (which will allow lens changes cheaper than any camcorder you could afford -- most "House Beautiful" and "Architectural Digest" photo spreads of room views are with wide-angle lenses), and just use a video/photo editing software package with what's called the "Ken Burns Effect" (look it up on Wikipedia or on Apple's iMovie/iPhoto info pages). This will add "movement" and variety to an otherwise dull slideshow. But at least with digital photos you can concentrate on taking one good image at a time, and still do your time-lapse sequences, if you wish.

Prospective home buyers & remodeling customers are more interested in quick views of website photos, rather than sitting through an extended video when browsing online. HGTV & Bravo produce mostly sit-down TV entertainment, not web-browsing P.R./marketing content.

You might be eager to learn and practice your video/filmmaking skills, but until you master the photographic composition and lighting/exposure basics, you'll find you are just trying to put your "wants" ahead of your dad's website/marketing "needs".

hope this helps,
--Dennis C.
Â

SLR camera BAG help.........................?

Ephemera

I can't find any nice, leather SLR cases, they all look like packedlunches these days! Please suggest sites, shops, whatever. I'm in the UK so no strictly US sites.

Answer
Don't get a leather case. They're just impractical for an SLR. If you plan on using your SLR seriously and/or often, I would get a nylon or a canvas camera bag or backpack.

I recommend Lowepro, especially the Slingshot series. I also recommend Tamrac. I use a Tamrac backpack with side-access, and I love it; it's so convenient.

Check out both Tamrac's site and Lowepro's site, they should have no problem shipping to the UK.

Best Digital SLR Cameras?

artsy_drea

I am a student in an art school who is really debating going into hotography. Even if I dont I really love it and I want to get a Digital SLR camera. I was wondering what brands are the best, I think Nikon from what i understand but am I wrong? What should I look for in a camer/camera set in order to get the best camera? (I am looking at one of those kits with a bag and an extra lens, are those worth the money?) (price ranges for the product you are talking about would be very helpful)

I would really appereciate professional photographer but all opinions are welcome

Answer
Any of the cameras out today will give you a good picture.
If you are just starting out w/ SLR or DSLR cameras, I suggest you look at the entry level models.
Less pricey, good features and good pictures. Look at the Nikon D40, Sony Alpha 200/300/350 series, and Canon Rebel series. Hold each one.
Load it with battery, a large lens, and a flash. You will soon see which is more comfortable to you. If it ain't comfortable, you won't use it, regardless of how many extra gizmos you got with it.
Get to a camera store, and hold each one. Bear in mind how YOU will use the camera, and ask about lenses for that purpose.

Hope it helps.

whats the best lorex high resoluttion camera out there.?

fencer

I recently bought a Lorex Edge+ LH328501C4 8-Channel Video Security DVR with Internet and im looking to add 3 addituional high end cameras to the system one at the driveway end of the house to keep an eye on the driveway and 2 more at the other end to keep an eye on the street and the neighbors kids which have been know to break into houses and cars in the area.
I would loike something really clear and strong.

Thanks for reading all .

J

Answer
Lorex is complete junk and are extremely low end systems, there is no such thing as a good or high resolution lorex camera. I would recommend dummy cameras they will be just as effective as lorex and you wont be as disappointed by them.

Lorex does not sell to any profession security installer they market to end-user who don't know better because anyone knowledgeable about CCTV cameras and surveillance systems wont touch Lorex with a 10 foot pole.

Always buy DVR and security equipment from a good brand name manufacturer like Pleco, Bosch, Honeywell Ascendent: http://www.ascendentgroup.com

Not all DVRs are created equal, in fact there are many options that offer varying performance much like the automobile industry. In the world of DVRs you can find the equivalent of a $10,000 Kia and a $350,000 Ferrari and everything in between. Both have 4 wheels and windshield but that where the similarities end, itâs under the hood that counts. Just like any other consumer electronic in the end you get what you pay for.

Unfortunately many people buy very low end systems which have poor frame rate and bad image quality because they buy from Amazon, "spy stores" Lorex, Q-see, NCIX, new-egg, and other online retailers who sell cheap products for china there were never intended to be anything more then a nany cam and should never be used to provide security.

My personal favorite DVR is Ascendent X4 series: Ascendentâs Tri-Fusion Hybrid Platform allows for the creation of a true hybrid surveillance system by utilizing the advantages of Analog, Megapixel, and IP technologies .

The X4S also uses the latest H.264/SVC codec offer video substantially better quality,. While its file size sizes is 30% smaller than MPEG-4, 60% smaller than MPEG-2, and exponentially smaller than MJPEG.

The smaller the files size the more images are able to be sent, and the faster they can be processed improving both FPS and speed. File size is the heart of any DVR and goes far beyond just its streaming capabilities, as it also determines the recording storage time, how much you can back up at once, how fast it renders and searches video. The file size of a DVR impacts the performance of the DVR in just about every aspect from speed to longevity and is often the most important spec of any DVR.

If you are buying a DVR and streaming is a high priority I suggest you ask for a demo and connect to the DVR to make sure it is able to stream fast enough for your needs. Most DVRs say they have remote viewing but it is often too slow and laggy to be of any use especially if it is a standalone.

Just like any other consumer electronic in the end you get what you pay for. Most retailers and sellers make about a 40-80% profit margin, this is after costs like shipping and overhead. That means when you buy a product that costs $100.00 the manufacturer usually has only spent $30 to build it which simply means itâs not a good product and will probably have a working life of about 2 months. Cheap products are like disposable razors they are NOT designed to last for a long time and you will end up replacing them every 2 months.

DVRs need to be good quality as they run 24/7 (20X more than the average electronic device) and process anywhere from 30-480 frames per second which in a year is over 15 billion images, and a good DVR should last 3-5 years.

If you are only going to spend 70$ on cameras then you should buy 15 dummy cameras they will be just as effective and cheaper hen swan cameras.

Also as far as night vision or IR cameras go most do not give good images in the dark. Many companies claim good night vision but there are only a handful of brands who give night vision over 30 feet out doors. normally if a cameras is rated 150 feet of IR it will give you ok images at 30 feet at night and good images at about 20 if rated for 60 feet you might get 15 indoors and will be useless outdoors.

2 Great IR outdoor cameras
http://ascendentdvr.com/ascentseries2/52â¦ ($95)

http://ascendentdvr.com/vistaseries2/visâ¦ ($235.00)

Some good CCTV brands that I recommend are Bosch, Pelco, Honeywell and Ascendent.

http://www.ascendentgroup.com (best price/ performance)
www.honeywell.com
www.pelco.com/
http://www.bosch.com

Economical DVR's
Two good economical DVRs I would recommend are Ascendent's AVP-4120 DVR or Pelco's DX-400. They will allow you to view all your cameras instantly from anywhere in the world using either IE, or a client software. The AVP-4120 uses the latest H.264 codec to improve streaming and recording time, and will allow PCs and smart phones to remotely view and control your cameras. These are the DVRs I would recommend that are good quality and affordable from companies who stand behind there products.

Again if you are going to buy no name products save money and get dummy cameras they are just as affective and you will be less disappointed.

Hope this Helps,
williammorales93@ymail.com

50 cameras surveillance systems?

pc.arena

Are church is looking to put in 50 cameras all IP ones.. can someone help me we just need general quote on how much 50 cameras would cost and server also can it just be any server or software? any great web sites that help with this.. thanks for your time
this is one of the largest church and we have class rooms as well we have had experts come in and look at are place and point out how many we need and its around 50 we only need 5 in the main room area but we have many many class rooms that need them..

Answer
Here are some for a start.

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/vpndevc/ps6918/ps9692/ps9716/data_sheet_c78-492032.html

http://platinum-cctv.com/MegaPixel_MJPEG_Box_IP_Cameras.asp

http://vdocapture.com/TwoNewHighDefinitionVideomera.htm

Why is it you did not use Yahoo Search for these links instead of Yahoo Answers. Using Yahoo Search is much faster and gives you more options

You can also use security systems throughout the US that provide these services at a fraction of the cost of all the hardware you will need and the cost of a staffer to keep it up and running.

Digital vs SLR cameras?

(^-^)-

I'm just wondering....

If I have a 3x Optical Zoom digital camera, and a 3x Optical Zoom SLR camera with a 18-55mm lens, how much better would the quality of a picture taken at the same distance be on the SLR camera. Would it even make a difference? Thanks :)

Answer
It makes a huge difference.

Sensor size, optical quality and electronics inside the camera make the whole difference.

Try not to think of the interchangeable lenses in 3x, 11x or any other. Optical zoom "x" factors are only important on P&S cameras since the lens can never be changed out.

The optical range of a lens on your DSLR has nothing to do with which you choose. One of the best lenses I own is a 1x ... a prime lens.

SLR vs point and shoot cameras?

Love Star

I'm looking to get a new camera and currently i have a kodak eashyshare mini m200. I believe it's a point and shoot and I was just wondering what the differences were exactly between an SLR and a point and shoot and some pros and cons. The main things I want in my new camera is a good image stabilization and around 20x zoom. Thanks :)
Also, if you have any camera recommendations under 200$ that would be great :)
Is dSLR and SLR the same thing?
Is dSLR and SLR the same thing?
Whoops didn't mean to put tht twice, but some of you were mentioning bridge cameras..what are those?

Answer
You are looking at dSLRs. SLRs are film, and essentially dead technology.

Before you can make a move to a dSLR or ILC camera, you need to learn the terms, and understand that you have to give some things up. Photography is all about give and take, you can't have it all, no matter how much you spend.

Up first, there is no such thing as a dSLR with 5, 10 or 20x zoom. Because lenses are not permanently attached to the body they way they are with a compact, you don't use that term.

Next up, you can forget about big zoom numbers. dSLRs and ILC cameras have large image sensors, much, much larger than those found in compacts. To get the same reach as a given compact, the lenses have to be larger. No way around it, unless someone can figure out how to break the laws of physics.

For under 200 dollars, forget that too. dSLRs with tax or shipping usually start out at around 600 US dollars. ILC closer to 500.

don't bother with bridge cameras. Camera companies make them to sell more cameras, not to give you better image quality. To get those big zoom numbers, they use the smallest image sensor they can get away with, it's a cheat. This is the part where the gears in your head should start moving.

if you want a dSLR with image stabilization you only have two choices, Sony Alpha and Pentax.

Canon and Nikon use this technology in their lenses, only problem, it's only certain lenses and no fast primes.

don't bother with a bridge camera, AKA super/megazoom camera unless you are really dying for that big zoom, and you will ONLY shoot out in good sunlight.

In low light you will get the horrid image quality of a cell phone cam or compact because at its heart, that tiny image sensor will rear its ugly head. If you want real image quality you want a LARGE image sensor (dSLR or ILC) so keep saving your money.

research the Pentax K 30, Sony A57 and A58. For something more compact with a huge image sensor, look at Sony's new NEX 3N.

Friday, February 28, 2014

Best digital camera for shooting kids?

m_manary

Looking for one that has rechargeable batteries, like you plug the entire camera into a socket to recharge (biggest pet peeve is digi-cams that eat batteries like candy) 12 mega-pixels, shoots still shot and video (I don't want a recorder that does still cause I hear they shoot craptastic pics), cool features, easy to use with SD card, and finally no more then $250.
If you do not use P & S cameras what do you use? I've never taken a photography class and my Dad always had an expensive Nikon with two lenses and back then it was all film.
Thanks for everyone's input and after doing a lot of reading and realizing our old camera which we loved but died after 3+ years of use was a canon power shot we are going with the Cannon PowerSot SD780 IS, if after a few weeks of use we do not like we will give the PowerShot SX120 IS a try.

Answer
I changed from P&S cameras to my DSLR because of two problems - low light issues and shutterlag.
My little P&Ss made me miss so many opportunities with my kids and other subjects.

However, it sounds like you do want just a P&S. Here is my usual speech on the subject, I'm sure you will find something helpful in it:

At least 10 - 30 times a day someone on YA asks: "Which one is a good camera to buy?"
A quick search would have given you hundreds of instant replies (without having to wait for answers), but once again here is my 10 cents on the subject:

Point & Shoot cameras are wonderfully handy because of their small size.
When light conditions are ideal, they even take really nice photos - all of them do.

However, they all DO have limitations - they don't do very well in low light situations (i.e. noisy photos, hard to avoid blur, etc). The little onboard flash is very harsh at close range, and doesn't reach very far.
Many of them have no manual functions, so you are limited to only very basic photos, you can't compensate for unusual situations, or do many fun "tricks" and special effects.
P&S's also suffer from frustrating shutterlag and many of them chew through batteries rather quickly.

If you're ok with all those limitations, then go ahead and pick one, most of them (the same type and same price range) are rather similar. Personally I would pick either a Canon or a Nikon, and would certainly stay away from Kodak.

A higher end P&S will give you more manual options and better quality. Many of those even give you the option of adding a proper flash (which makes a big difference to your flash photos).

Don't worry too much about megapixels - all modern cameras have plenty enough, plus there is a limit to how many pixels you can squash into a tiny P&S sensor before you actually LOSE quality rather than gain it.
Don't worry about digital zoom, in fact, don't EVER use it. It simply crops away pixels, i.e. destroys information. The only real zoom is optical.

Some words about special effect features such as color accent, or even just b/w or sepia:
About applying any sort of effect in camera: DON'T DO IT !
Imagine if you just happen to take the best photo you ever took - surely you would want to have it in all its glory, right?
Always set your camera to biggest size, best quality (and to color).
That way, you start with the best possible photo as your original.
Then you make a copy and edit it to your heart's content.
You have much better control over any editing on your computer, even something as simple as b&w will look MUCH better when it was processed properly instead of in camera.
You can do all sorts of things to it PLUS you get to keep your original.

Decide which features are important to you, and look for cameras that have that feature.
Then go compare a few models on www.dpreview.com .

The very best thing you can do for your success is to borrow some books and learn about photography. A bit of knowledge will make a much bigger difference to your photos than your choice of P&S camera can.

For what it's worth - if I was in the market for a P&S camera right now, my choice would be a Canon Powershot SX20 IS http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/controller?act=ModelInfoAct&fcategoryid=144&modelid=19208

Which camera should I buy?

Alex

I am an amateur photographer and I'm buying my first DSLR camera. I've been looking at the Nikon d5000 for quite awhile and I really like what it has to offer. However recently someone suggested buying a used nikon d200 because it's more of an advanced level camera and has some better features than the d5000. Now I'm stuck between the two and I don't know what to buy. Leave your thoughts about it. And I'm **not** interested in buying a Canon or Olympus or anything else, I'm a Nikon kid and you can't convince me otherwise.

Answer
I am a big proponent of going the used D200 route (it may have been my suggestion that you saw in another question). Here are the reasons I recommend the D200 over a new amateur level DSLR:

1. They are more durable than the amateur level cameras. The D200 is a 'semi-pro' body, so there is a good bit more metal in the construction, which makes it sturdier. It also has better, more intuitive controls which are basically of the same layout as the pro bodies, so as you move up, future cameras will require less of a learning curve.

2. They can autofocus all Nikon AF lenses. You aren't limited only to AF-S lenses, which opens up a huge range of very high quality used lenses that perform wonderfully and will last decades, but are quite inexpensive just because they aren't the newest, hottest thing on the market. This includes all of the lenses designed for FX (full frame) cameras, both film and digital, which are the lenses you should buy if you think you might want to go full frame on down the road, even if that is several years away, because again, lenses last decades, and you don't want to spend good money on lenses that will be useless to you on down the road.

3. Someone else has already taken the hit on the new cost of the camera. Digital cameras are like cars. They depreciate the second they are taken out of the store. With the rapid pace of new digital camera bodies, there is no need to pay full retail price for a brand new one.

4. Sure, the d200 may only be a 10 megapixel camera, but you can still make massive prints from a 10 megapixel body. In fact, you can make large prints from anything six megapixels and up.

5. The money you save in the long run by staying a generation or two behind the curve will allow you to invest more money in high quality lenses, and it will allow you the freedom to move up to nicer bodies on down the road without spending two grand every couple of years. By the time that D200 is kaput, you will be able to get a D700 at a similarly reasonable price.

6. The only place the D200 is slightly lacking is in high ISO noise. This, however, is balanced by the fact that you will be able to afford faster lenses than the lousy f3.5-5.6 kit zoom that will be useless in a few years anyway. With a 105mm f2.8 lens, you can shoot a full two stops of ISO lower than you could with a zoom that only goes to f/5.6.

7. Just because a new model comes out, it doesn't render previous models useless or inadequate. The D200 is still just as good as it ever has been. Tons and tons of fantastic images have been made with d200s, and there is no reason that fantastic images can't still be made with them.

If you are looking to impress your friends or the people at the local camera club with the newest and best equipment, the D200 is not for you. If you are looking for fantastic value in good quality equipment, and you want to get more for the same or less money, go with a D200 and a good selection of used non-DX lenses.

Lens recommendations to accompany a D200 that will last a lifetime:

Primes:

20mm f2.8
35mm f2
50mm f1.8
105mm f2.8

zooms:

20-35 f2.8
35-70 f2.8 micro
80-200 f2.8 af-d

If you are a beginner, stick with primes.

Good luck!

Want to know about Video Camera?

Gaurav

Hi,

I want to know about Video camera... First of all am very sorry for my english grammer , so plz ..

Well i want to know about alternative of Panasonic MD 9 Video camera. which is not available new in india, It is in DVC..

Am from the small city of india.. and md 9 is perfect for my city or nearest parties and functions. it was available in little amount of money. but its not available now..

Mr budget is too low, so give me some idea or model name of which is good for me now in Sony.. I mean to say that , its perfectly attent the weddings and all important functions like panasonic md9... Which is the lowest price camera of Sony like Md 9?.. plz give me the price and model no. of it..

Thank you and sorry again..

Answer
HD Camcorders and DSLR Cameras interpolate the video, which means of every 25 frames of video, 4 or 5 frames are taken by the lens assembly; the other frames in between these are filled in by the camcorder inner circuitry, thus giving you not true video. It looks like this -one frame from the lens assembly, 7or 8 from the electronic circuitry, one frame from the lens assembly, 7or 8 from the electronic circuitry, one frame from the lens assembly, 7or 8 from the electronic circuitry, one frame from the lens assembly, 7or 8 from the electronic circuitry, from front to back of the video. Near impossible to edit, even when you have the Multi port processor computer with the big 1GB Graphics card and a Sound card that is required to edit, view, watch and work with the files these camcorders produce.

DSLR Cameras, all Makes, all Models, all have the same problem when video taping some long videos, all overheat at the 13 to 18 minute mark, depending on the Make and Model. This is unavoidable, it all has to with the fact, video is an afterthought in DSLR camera production.

Consumer Level HD Camcorders and DSLR Cameras have 4 problems. 1) Blurry, fuzzy, out of focus areas closely around people in videos taken by consumer level HD camcorders. 2) Any movement, even a wave or lifting an arm, while in front of a recording Consumer Level HD Camcorder and DSLR Cameras, results in screen ghosts and artifacts being left on the video track, following the movement. Makes for bad video, sports videos are unwatchable. 3) These Consumer Level HD Camcorders and DSLR Cameras all have a habit of the transferred to computer files are something you need to convert, thus losing your HD quality, to work with your editing software. 4) Mandatory maximum record times - 1 hour, 30 minutes, 8 minutes, 3 minutes â four different times advertised as maximum record time for some Consumer Level HD Camcorders and DSLR Cameras. No event I have ever been to is that short. Either take multiple camcorders and DSLR Cameras or pack up with out getting the end of the event on video.

MiniDV is currently the most popular format for consumer digital camcorders. MiniDV camcorders are typically more affordable than their HDD and DVD counterparts. Each MiniDV tape will typically hold an hour of footage at normal recording speed and quality. MiniDV tapes are available for purchase at not only electronic and camera stores, but also at drugs stores and grocery stores, making them easy to find while your on vacation. There are literally hundreds of MiniDV camcorders available; both in standard and high-definition. And add the fact that to get a HD camcorder that could produce better video quality footage, one would have to spend in excess of $3500 for that camcorder that could produce higher quality video

http://simplevideoediting.com/learn/part1_camcorder_choices.htm

http://simplevideoediting.com/learn/part2_connect_camcorder.htm

http://usa.canon.com/cusa/consumer/products/camcorders/consumer_camcorders/vixia_hv40#Overview

where to buy dslr cameras in india?

rnoytt

cheap and affordable..preferably in kolkata

Answer
try ebay.

DSLR Camera Help...?

Q. This has to be the 10th question I've posted about deciding on a DSLR camera =P Okay, so here it goes:
I am looking for a good starter camera (Nikon) but nothing that isn't "limited in controls" (as one of my past questions was answered.)
I want a good camera (thinking about a D40x) with a 18mm - 200mm lens. What is this lens best for?
I have heard that if I'm planning doing anything serious with Photography, I should go ahead and just step it up to the D80.
Should I stick to the D40x as a starter and just buy the 18-200 lens?
The 18-200 lens was recommended by my technology teacher, and she was satisfied with it, so I thought maybe I should buy that one, instead of 2 different lenses (18-55 and 55-200)
I need help on some specs and stuff, help me decide what may be best for me?
Thanks a lot guys,
-A.J.
Alright...so I'm planning on spending no more than $900 or $1000 on this camera.
I just want the camera body, and the 18mm - 200mm lens, unless there's a better combination.
If I have the D40x, can I still use manual focus?
It doesn't just have Auto Focus does it?
Or does the 18mm - 200mm lens not let you use manual focus while having that lens?
Confusing.
Okay, so I don't think I want to spend $900 to $1000.
I definitely don't want to spend any more than $700 $750ish.
I found a good deal on just a Nikon D40. It's $549.99 with a 18-55mm lens, and a 55-200mm lens also. Both lenses and and the D40 body. It's still 6.1 Megapixels but I think I can deal with it. =)
Is this a better decision that trying to worry with the D40x and finding a lens for that?
-A.J.

Answer
I was a Nikon (F2AS & FM2) user-but switched to Canon a while ago (Digital Rebel and later 5D). So I can't really give you any sound advice on the lens itself. However, I am sure by now you realize that D40 (and D40X) are only able to autofocus with AF-S lenses only (those lenses with autofocus motor inside). This limits you to a few Nikon & Sigma lenses (but in time, no doubt more will be available.)

And I believe it does not have a depth-of-field preview button either.

You will do better if you bought at least the Nikon D80. If you can live with the shortcoming(s) of D40 (or D40x), or if your budget does not allow you to get the D80, then you can work around it.

A friend has D40 and she has taken beautiful photos with it. It really is the person behind the camera that does the work.

Have you gone to the store and played with either one yourself?

Here is a really nice review on D40 by Popular Photography magazine. http://www.popphoto.com/cameras/3756/camera-test-nikon-d40.html

And here is one on the X model.

http://www.popphoto.com/cameras/3896/camera-test-nikon-d40x.html

And of Nikon D80.
http://www.popphoto.com/cameras/3231/camera-test-nikon-d80.html

Hope this helps, even a little.

Addendum: D40 and the x model do not have an autofocus motor inside the camera body so it will only autofocus with a lens that has a motor built in. This limits you to a few lenses Nikon & Sigma (I am sure there will be plenty others) make or you will have to manually focus the lens yourself. You may think it's not a big deal but it gets old really quickly.

This is the page of that lens (have you looked?) http://www.nikonusa.com/template.php?cat=1&grp=5&productNr=2159 and it states it has a motor built in, so yes, it will work with Nikon D40 ( and x)

Furthermore, this is what their website says about these models:

Compatible Lenses*: Nikon F mount with AF coupling and AF contacts Type G or D AF Nikkor:
1) AF-S, AF-I: All functions supported;
2) Other Type G or D AF Nikkor: All functions supported except autofocus
3) PC Micro-Nikkor 85mm f/2.8D: Can only be used in mode M; all other functions supported except autofocus
4) Other AF Nikkor*ÃÂ¹/AI-P Nikkor: All functions supported except autofocus and 3D Color Matrix Metering II
5) Non-CPU: Can be used in mode M, but exposure meter does not function; electronic range finder can be used if maximum aperture is f/5.6 or faster
6) IX Nikkor lenses cannot be used
*ÃÂ¹ Excluding lenses for F3AF

----------------

A friend has D40 and she has taken some beautiful photos with it. It's not the camera--it's the photographer!! So stop worrying so much--buy it (this black Friday, I suppose) and go out and take beautiful photos and enjoy yourself.

What kind of DSLR camera should i get?

Teresa

My budget is virtually limitless but i'd like to keep it around Â£700 as my parents would be angry if i
spend more than that.

I like using natural light in my photos as much as i can and normally just shoot landscapes like rivers and forests. My dad has an SLR canon and I love that camera but he doesn't let me use it often so I want my own, I just have a normal bridge camera and I am getting bored of it.

Answer
Depends on how used to u are to a DSLR....

If u'r a newbie go for a midrange Dx format DSLR say Nikon D5100,Nikon D90,Nikon D7000 or Canon 550D, Canon 60D

if u are getting your 2nd DSLR go for Nikon D700 or Canon EOS 5D Mark II

IPHONE 4 !?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?

Kennedy

should i get the iphone 4? and why?
thaaanks!

Answer
No,

Well i should revise that... if you want an ok phone, yes. If you want the Best, NO!!

I phones and Androids are about the same price, so why would you want the ok if you can get the best? Here is why:

.........................Iphone!

~Advantages:
*Apple Store
*Screen resolution
*Camera is ok
*Black color- I really think the white is a bad idea (reflects light, shows dirt, and screen will look less resolution)

~Disadvantages:
*Small Screen
*No customization
*Very fragile
*No 4G
*Only 1GHz processor
*Feels "Thick"
*Battery not the best
*Apple has its own charger for phone, its not a universal charger
*No SD card
*Battery is not removable
*Keyboard seems crammed

THIS PHONE IS CRAZY EXPENSIVE, WHEN YOU CAN BUY A 64 GB MICRO SD CARD FOR 80 BUCKS AND THE IPHONE 16GB TO 64GB IS OVER 200 DOLLARS MORE.

..................Android!

Overall, its hard to do a simple advantages and disadvantages of each because there are so many compared to the iphone. But here is why android is better:

*Widgets and Customization
*Bigger screens
*Packs 1.2 and 1.5 GHZ processors
*High resolution screens that are beating the iphone
*High grade building, my droid razr is build to last much better then an iphone, Plus scratch resistant glass
*One universal charger for many of the android lines
*Many allow micro SD cards
*HDMI out
*4G LTE!

Disadvantages:
*can get slow- But every phone will. Doing a factory reset after one year is a good idea

My Recommendation:

If i were you, go for the Samsung Galaxy SIII. The phone is packing a 4.8 inch screen with:

Dual core processor (1.4 GHZ, BLAZING)
Very fast processor (1400 MHz)
Lots of RAM (1024 MB RAM)
Very big display (4.80 inches)
Extremely high pixel density screen, over 300ppi (306 ppi)
High-resolution display (720 x 1280 pixels)
High-resolution camera (8 megapixels)
Fast mobile data support (4G)
NFC
HDMI connector for TV-out (via microUSB)
Nice Battery size (2100 mAh)
More customization
Super skinny and light (just 8.6 mm thick and 4.69oz or 133 grams)

Iphone 4 and 4s Camera?

Erik Flore

Is there a significant difference in picture quality between 4 and 4s. I wanted to use the phone for my instagram. I like to take personal pictures along with nature /sky shots. Tell me your opinions.

Answer
iPhone 4 camera is a 5 megapixel camera
While the 4s is an 8 megapixel camera
4s shoots 1080p HD videos while the 4 shoots 720p
If you are planning on getting one of them and you really don't need professional photographing
And want one which is good enough to post good photos on Instagram then go with the 4
The iPhone 4 camera is really good and it will be more than enough to post photos on Instagram
Hope I helped :)

What's a good DSLR camera for a beginner?

Vira

Was it released recently and around how much does it cost?
I mostly want to take still indoor pictures.

Answer
Here are the cameras I advise people to consider if they are looking to get into a DSLR.

There are a number of good brands so don't be sold on the idea one brand is better than another. I would keep your costs down. I would get a DSLR with a short zoom (like a 18-55mm) to start. No reason to spend more than $425 to $550. Either a 10MP or 12MP will do just fine.

Below, I listed some links, the first link listed below is to a web page that lists the 3 DSLR cameras I am recommending. This list will let you compare features and specs, also it has links to reviews of the cameras, the reviews include sample images from the cameras. This listing page also will also at the top have the "Announced Date" for the camera which is very close to the release date and will provide you with how long the camera has been out.

Also I included some links to some dealers so that you can try and get the best price. Some dealers have some nice extras, free shipping is very common, and sometimes they are offering a free memory card and/or camera bag. Sometimes you have to click in the âadd to cartâ button to see the actual price.

Here are some models that I think are well worth researching including estimated price range:

Nikon D3000 10MP DSLR Digital Camera with 18-55mm VR Lens - $460 to $480
EOS Rebel XS (1000D) 10MP DSLR Digital Camera Kit w/18-55mm IS Lens - $499 to $525
Pentax K-x 12MP DSLR with 18-55mm Zoom (has HD Video also) - $485 to $525

Pick a price range, some features you know you want, and even consider which camera feels good in your hand as a factor. Plenty of great cameras, get one you like and start learning the principles of photography and you will be on your way to making some great images.

Most people go with Nikon or Canon but, I think the Pentax could be of special interest, since it can do HD video and has excellent quality at higher ISO settings which can be useful in low light places and helping get the picture. These features, especially the HD video, on a Nikon or Canon will cost you $100 to $200 more. Look into the Nikon D5000 also if you decide you like Nikon but want video ability also.

If you have any questions and if you think I can be of help then please do contact me.

Hope this helps. Good luck.

Mark

marksablow.com

DSLR camera for beginners?

velvetreds

guys can you recommend any DSLR camera for Beginners. And i would like the price is budget friendly.:)

Answer
A DSLR camera is an investment but it can be well worth it. DSLR cameras have the larger sensor so you get a higher quality images. You can change lenses which can be valuable, by allowing to adjust to different needs.

There are a number of good brands so don't be sold on the idea one brand is better than another. I would keep your costs down. I would get a DSLR with a short zoom (like a 18-55mm) to start. No reason to spend more than $425 to $550. Either a 10MP or 12MP will do just fine.

Below, I listed some links, the first link listed below is to a web page that lists the 3 DSLR cameras I am recommending. This list will let you compare features and specs, also it has links to reviews of the cameras, the reviews include sample images from the cameras. Also I included some links to some dealers so that you can try and get the best price. Some dealers have some nice extras, free shipping is very common, and sometimes they are offering a free memory card and/or camera bag. Sometimes you have to click in the âadd to cartâ button to see the actual price.

Here are some models that I think are well worth researching:

Nikon D3000 10MP DSLR Digital Camera with 18-55mm VR Lens - $449
EOS Rebel XS (1000D) 10MP DSLR Digital Camera Kit w/18-55mm IS Lens - $499
Pentax K-x 12MP DSLR with 18-55mm Zoom (has HD Video also) - $550

Pick a price range, some features you know you want, and even consider which camera feels good in your hand as a factor. Plenty of great cameras, get one you like and start learning the principles of photography and you will be on your way to making some great images.

If you want to stay under $500 then go Nikon or Canon but, I think the Pentax could be of special interest, since it can do HD video and has excellent quality at higher ISO settings which can be useful in low light places and helping get the picture. These features, especially the HD video, on a Nikon or Canon will cost you $100 to $200 more.

If you have any questions and if you think I can be of help then please do contact me.

Hope this helps. Good luck.

Mark

marksablow.com

Thursday, February 27, 2014

Which one of these 2 cameras should I buy?

StrangeMuf

1. Olympus FE-46

2.Samsung ES25

here are the links :

1.http://www.olympus.ro/consumer/29_digital-camera_fe-46_21915.htm#

2.http://www.samsung.com/in/consumer/camera-camcorder/digital-camera/compact/EC-ES25ZZBABIN/index.idx?pagetype=prd_detail&tab=specification

Answer
I would suggest
1)Olympus FE-46 12MP Digital Camera Blue Crayola Kit with 5x Optical Zoom and 2.7 inch LCD and Black Case, 64 pack of Crayons and Storage Box
*5x optical zoom; 12-megapixel resolution for photo-quality prints up to 20 x 30 inches
*6 months access to ColorMe; enhance images online
*AF Tracking technology; choose from three in-camera Magic Filters
*2.7-inch LCD; Edit images in-camera; Red-Eye Fix, Lighting Fix, Resizing and Cropping
*Capture images to xD-Picture Card or microSD (not included)
http://www.amazon.com/Olympus-Digital-Blue-Crayola-Kit/dp/B002PMV3YI/?tag=bdd-linking-001-20

2)Nikon Coolpix L22 12.1MP Digital Camera with 3.6x Optical Zoom and 3.0-Inch LCD (Red-primary)
*12.0 megapixels for stunning prints as large as 16 x 20 inches
*3.6x Zoom-NIKKOR glass lens (37mm to 134mm); bright 3.0-inch LCD
*Easy Auto Mode with Scene Auto Selector; capture 640 x 480 movies with sound at 30fps
*3-way VR Image Stabilization System
*EXPEED Image Processing; Smart Portrait System
http://www.amazon.com/Nikon-Coolpix-L22-3-0-Inch-Red-primary/dp/B0034XIL60/?tag=bdd-linking-001-20

3)Canon PowerShot SX20IS 12.1MP Digital Camera with 20x Wide Angle Optical Image Stabilized Zoom and 2.5-inch Articulating LCD
* High-powered 20x wide-angle optical zoom with Optical Image Stabilizer
* Capture 720p HD movies with stereo sound; HDMI output connector for easy playback on your HDTV
* 2.5-inch Vari-Angle System LCD; improved Smart AUTO intelligently selects from 22 predefined shooting situations
* DIGIC 4 Image Processor; 12.1-megapixel resolution for poster-size, photo-quality prints
* Powered by AA batteries (included); capture images to SD/SDHC memory cards (not included)
http://www.amazon.com/Canon-PowerShot-SX20-prosumer-supported/dp/B002LITT3I/?tag=bdd-linking-001-20

4)Canon Digital Rebel XSi 12.2 MP Digital SLR Camera with EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Lens (Black)
*12.2-megapixel CMOS sensor captures enough detail for poster-size, photo-quality prints
*Large 3.0-inch LCD display; includes Canon's EF-S 18-55mm, f3.5-5.6 IS zoom lens
*DIGIC III image processor provides fast, accurate image processing; improved Autofocus and framing rate
*EOS Integrated Cleaning system, plus Dust Delete Data Detection in included software
*Stores images on SD/SDHC memory cards (not included)
http://www.amazon.com/Canon-Digital-Camera-18-55mm-3-5-5-6/dp/B0012YA85A/?tag=bdd-linking-001-20

what is the equivalent of 300dps to megapixel?

suqqir

Answer
I presume you mean "dpi" or dots per inch.

There isn't an "equivalent" between dpi and megapixels.

Instead, you have to do some math between the size of your print, the number of pixels horizontally and vertically, and the dpi output of your printer. And even then, the printer driver will do some interpolation as well.

Example: Let's say you want an 8" x 12" print at the printer's native 300 dpi. In fact, that would be an image that's (8"x300dpi) by (12"x300dpi) or 2400 x 3600.

When you multiply 2400 x 3600, you get 8,640,000 total dots or 8.64 million dots. Now, this is where many people tell you that you'd need an 8.64 megapixel camera to get this. However, this is not correct.

The reality is that pixels and printer dots per inch are not equivalent. Moreover, printer drivers interpolate because rarely does the math come out so nicely. Many images look just fine at 150 to 200 pixels per inch (a different measurement than dots per inch, by the way).

Bottom line: Any camera six megapixels or better will give you prints that are just fine, up to any reasonable or popularly printed size.

A second example: let's say you want a commonly sized 4" x 6" print at 300 dpi. That's (4"x300dpi) x (6"x300dpi) = 1200 x 1800. That's 2.16 million dots. So theoretically, a 2.1 megapixel camera is what you'd need to achieve that. Again, you can actually get by with less than that with real cameras; even a 1.3 megapixel camera should be able to make an acceptable 4x6" print with good printer drivers.

what's a good HD camera?

Kaylee

I'm looking for a good camera that takes very HD photos. That captures everything on a persons face. Like me, if I'm wearing bright eyeshadows, I would like my camera to clearly pick that up. and any type of makeup I'm wearing. Any one know a camera that can do that?

Answer
Nikon D3100 camera, of course, is targeted to those entering the DSLR world. I am myself just beginning to take the baby steps and I got a really good camera to get me started! This camera is amazing. The pictures are crisp, and I definitely love the "Guide" mode. The camera is light weight and not so big like other DSLR cameras.

how to connect a camera to telescope?

hopestorm

I have a fuji finepix s6000fd camera and a Meade 70AZ-ADR telescope. Is there a way to connect this camera to the telescope? what equipment I should buy? Sounds like there are many T-Mount and camera adapter for other camera models, but really find specifically for Fuji. Thanks

Answer
Since this camera isn't a DSLR, you can't use a T ring.

With that small a scope on an altazimuth mount the only realistic target is the Moon. Don't bother with any hardware at first: focus on the Moon, aim the camera through the eyepiece and see what you get.

Digital Cameras?

kristin22

Hello, I am looking into buying my first digital camera, I have a Canon EOS Rebel (film) camera, but I'm looking to get into digital also. I would like to get some feedback on which brands have proven to be better (Canon, Kodak, Sony, Fuji)and what the Megapixels, Really means. I appreciate any othe tips also!! Thank-you!!
I am looking to spend under $200 for now on a digital camera.

Answer
I'll give you several cameras at your price range and just pick what you want, I personally would pick the Canon A550 for it's features and Canon's consistent great quality in digital cameras.

Megapixel is the resolution of the camera so basically it depends of what kind of user you are and how big do you print your pictures. Also another example is if you crop a lot, then it's better for you to get a higher megapixel camera so that the "small portion" that will remain after the cropping is done will still be in good quality.

But remember one thing megapixel doesn't make the camera it's a combination of a lot of things like sensor quality, lens, shutter lag, frame rate, etc. So you might buy a 150$ 8 megapixel entry level camera, so don't expect to to be as good as a Canon Digital SLR Rebet XT (which is also 8 megapixels) which has far more superior features and sensor quality.

Nikon Coolpix 7600

http://reviews.cnet.com/Nikon_Coolpix_7600/4505-6501_7-31322217.html?tag=pdtl-list&ar=o

Canon PowerShot A550

http://reviews.cnet.com/Canon_PowerShot_A550_digital_camera/4505-6501_7-32314543.html?tag=pdtl-list

HP Photosmart R817

http://reviews.cnet.com/HP_Photosmart_R817/4505-6501_7-31411745.html?tag=pdtl-list

Enjoy :P

Digital Cameras..............?

Fghfg D

what kind of digital camera is really good for people like me who are into photography ? and i don't want one that is really expensive..

Answer
In new cameras, look for optical viewfinders (LCD invisible in bright sun) and check battery prices. High mega pixel settings take longer to process and may not be needed unless required for very large pictures or enlarging small parts of big pictures. Maximum print size for a 3 mega pixel setting is 8 x 10 inches. Click links below for more details.
http://www.kodak.com/eknec/PageQuerier.jhtml?pq-path=398&pq-locale=en_US&_requestid=2039 ...
http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/mpmyth.htm ...

Just saw this camera at Best Buy and think it is a great camera and a best buy. It has an optical viewfinder, image stabilizer, auto focus, and uses NiMH rechargeable batteries. Read as much of the following as you can for other information and help with choosing a camera.
Canon A590IS $129.99 at Staples yesterday.
http://bountii.com/deal-1523871-canon-powershot-8-0-megapixel.html ...

There is no one particular place to get great buys, but you may see something above that really helps you find the best buy. Click on the link in the information above for an example then search for your camera of choice at the upper left. Camera prices at this link change often.

While most of the cameras out there are really good, I would choose Canon over Nikon because it seems like more camera for the money. Some would say Canon withholds their best technology for high end cameras and Nikon implements their best at all levels. Before you decide, read all the text and links in the information below because it will help you know what to look for in a camera.

There are so many cameras out there it is difficult to say which is best, but digital is definitely the way to go. The second source link will be very helpful as it list most of the cameras out there with prices. The following information should help you know what to look for in a camera.

What gives a camera its picture quality?
The short answer is that it is mostly the skill of the photographer that produces high quality pictures. The lens and camera are very important, but the ability to set the scene, adjust the cameras settings, and hold the camera very still or use a tripod with auto or remote shutter actuation when required is what gets the great pictures.

Lots of great camera tips in these two links. http://www.danscamera.com/Learning/going_digital/#resolution ...
http://www.kodak.com/eknec/PageQuerier.jhtml?pq-path=38/10468/6368/333&pq-locale=en_US ...

Check this more for the money camera. FUJIFILM - FinePix 10.0-Megapixel Digital.
Life time Warranty (Parts & Labor).

Wide-angle shooting, a 12x optical zoom and picture stabilization mode combine in this camera for exceptional shooting performance, even at a distance. Plentiful scene modes, autofocus and automatic white balance controls make this camera a snap to operate. You may be able to find it on the Internet for a lower price.
http://www.bestbuy.com/site/olspage.jsp?skuId=8879234&type=product&productCategoryId=pcmcat152400050001&id=1212192673855 ...
http://www.digitalcamerareview.com/default.asp?newsID=3514&review=fuji+finepix+s1000 ...

This could be the best slim line camera with a viewfinder. It's PINK!
http://shopping.yahoo.com/p:Sony%20Cyber-shot%20DSC-W150%2FR%20Digital%20Camera:1995337750;_ylc=X3oDMTB0bjZzaWNuBF9TAzk2NjMyOTA3BHNlYwNmZWVkBHNsawNlbGVj ...
http://www.digitalcamerareview.com/default.asp?newsID=3462&review=sony+cybershot+w150 ...

The information about my camera is just to show that you don't need the biggest and best. Just know how to use the one you have.

My camera has 5.2 mega pixel, but I use 3 most of the time because it gives great results, is faster, and takes less memory. Also, it only has a 3 x optical zoom and 7 x digital zoom. I never use the digital zoom because making pictures larger works better on the computer. This is an old camera, but everyone is impressed with the quality pictures it takes ... like magic.

Check with the Geeks in several stores and compare prices. Ask what cameras they own, but don't believe everything you hear. Once you select a camera read all about it in the owner's manual. Just learned that my camera has red-eye prevention and correction. It also has adaptive lighting. You may be able to view owners manuals at this link, but will need to Login. http://www.retrevo.com/s/digital+camera ...

The source links will show most of the cameras out there with prices and help make your digital cameras work better.

Wednesday, February 26, 2014

Is 5 megapixels good or bad for a digital camera?

missjamo2

i'm looking to buy the kodak v570 digital camera with 5 mega pixels. Is that good or bad?

Answer
megapixels is just a hype, 5 megapixels is plenty good enough, the bigger megapixel, the bigger picture (memory) it gets (it doesn't mean the picture quality is better), you don't really need a 10 megapixel camera that takes pictures 5 or more times the size of your computer screen, unless you're a professional photographer and need to print large photos (life size).

Kodak V570 is a good camera, it has a 5x Optical Zooms that beats out the standards of 90% of the digital cameras out there 3-4x. If you spend a little more money, get the Kodak V610. Got 10x Optical Zoom.

digital camera??

sodaPOP

i want a digital camera that is under 100 dollars but takes really good pics.. any ideas...o and lots of room... help?! the one i have now stinks

Answer
Any digital camera that has a resolution of 2 megapixels or higher is good. If you want to make 8 X 10 blow ups or larger you will need to have an 8 megapixel or larger. But for the average joe or josephine, just aboyut anythhing they have out will do. Now room has to do with memory so look for a camera that will take an expansion card. Even a 128k card will give you hundreds of pictures of 640 X 800 resolution Camera listed below $70.00 5megapixel.

Cricket cell phone company phone?

Blond Mome

I was wondering what the best most durible phone that the cell phone cricket has at this time? I have tryed all the other cell phone companies and I am tired of worrieing about going over my bill one way or another so I am going to back to cricket for the comfort of knowing my bill will only be 60 a month... But I break there phones so easily so I am wondering does any one know of a cricket phone that is durible but still good for texting a pic messanging mainly??

Answer
The two that I would recommend would be the Samsung Messager which is available in blue or green. It has a 1.3 megapixel camera, an MP3 player and a sliding pull QWERTY keyboard. The other is the Kyocera Lingo. It too has a 1.3 megapixel camera and flips open to offer you a full QWERTY keyboard.

Canon rebel t3i, good camera?

Ariah

I've heard it's a good camera, but I want to hear some reviews/opinions on it. Where did you get it? How much was it? Do you recommend it? Any extras I should consider buying with it?
I'd like to order it with my Christmas money online, so if you have any recommended sites to order from, please link them in your comment!

Answer
I have owned the Canon EOS Rebel T3i since the month that it came out. Of course when it came out it was much more expensive, now since it has been updated by the T4i and the T5i; it's much cheaper. You can find it as of the time I am writing this for $437 with the EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS Lens. I am a reviewer on Amazon.com and wrote a review on this camera when it came out, but I will update my review as of today with a much more detailed review; I will include a transcript below and include my reviewer page for you to visit and confirm this. In plain and simplistic approach though, I highly recommend this entry level DSLR.

Review:

The Canon EOS Rebel T3i/EOS 600D/ EOS Kiss X5; a truly fantastic entry level DSLR for the price it's available at after being replaced by the Canon T4i & T5i. Featuring an 18.0 megapixel APS-C CMOS Sensor and a DIGIC 4 image processor it packs quite a lot of power in a small body. The camera is capable of shooting continuously at a maximum speed of 3.7 Frames per second; which isn't bad. It can also shoot in Full HD at 30 frames per second or 24 frames per second; or 720P at 60 frames per second.

The Drawback with video:

There is one thing that might make you avoid this camera if you want it specifically for video. It doesn't have the ability to focus automatically when recording a video. It is per say, possible; however, the time it simply takes to automatically adjust the focus takes way too long and is very noisy when using any lens that doesn't have USM (Ultrasonic Motor). This is not a bad thing though if you plan on shooting video in manual focus, it takes a while to get used to it, but the video quality that is produced with this camera is simply superb!

The camera features a 9 Point AF system which for the most part in my uses has proven to be decently accurate for the most part. Considering this is an entry level DSLR, it is more than enough for the average user. You can always just manually focus on your subjects and avoid being mistakenly focused on something that you don't want to be emphasize.

One of the most useful designs of this camera is the Vari angle LCD display it offers. It is what made the camera unique when it came out and it introduced a wide variety of possible shots without the discomfort that you would have had to go through before. Let's say that you want to take a photo from the bottom up, at a bug's eye perspective; before, you would have had to either lie down on the floor to look through the viewfinder or struggle by looking at the display that was only viewable at a certain spot. Now you can simply take a knee and flip the display in order to compose your shot with ease. The complete opposite of this scenario is also applicable, taking a picture from top to bottom you simple flip the display and adjust to where you can see your environment and subject perfectly.

Low Light shooting with this camera can be a struggle, at least with the stock lens that is usually bought with the camera (18-55mm). Pictures begin to look noisy reaching about ISO 1600. They are however still usable. When at ISO 6400 it can be pretty noisy, but any other camera would struggle here as well unless it is a true professional DSLR that reaches extremely high ISO sensitivities. The ISO on the camera is expandable to 12,800, but at that sensitivity pictures are pretty much useless. They will look as if they were taken with a cell phone and noise is observable everywhere even without zooming into the picture. If you want to take pictures in low lighting conditions you have two options: A) You can always use an external flash if possible, or use the pop up flash that is integrated on the camera. B) You can purchase a separate lens for the camera that a wide aperture; such as f/1.2, f/1.4, f/1.8
Some of these lenses can cost a lot of money, some more than the camera it's self. Remember though that the overall quality of an image can usually be a lot better with a great lens that an excellent camera with an average lens. The f/1.8 Canon lens runs you about $100, the f/1.4 about $300, and the f/1.2 for either $1,400 for the old version and $2,000 for the newer version.

How does this camera compare against a normal point and shoot camera?

A main concern by many is if having a DSLR like this will make a vast difference than the average point and shoot camera or high quality cell phone camera. The answer to this question is a simple yes. You will notice the difference with just the first time that you take a picture with this camera. 18.0 megapixels is a lot! There are other camera's in the market such as the Nikon D3200 with a 24.2 megapixel sensor, but in reality... you will never have a need for such a plethora of megapixels unless you are going to be printing out billboard sized photos. 18.0 megapixels is already enough and megapixels isn't always everything. The truth with megapixels is that sometimes too many of them can degrade the quality of a picture. In low lighting conditions a camera with a lower amount of megapixels will out perform the one with a higher amount of megapixels. This can be proven even with the simplest of camera's such as a webcam. The less the megapixels, the more light enters due to the pixels being larger.

The body of the camera is tough and is sure to last a long time if taken care of. I have owned this camera since the month that it came out and I don't regret purchasing it. It has never failed me in any occasion. One thing you should note though, if you want to record video with this camera; make sure you purchase a good memory card that is capable of processing the data quickly or else you will find the camera automatically stopping video recording. I would recommend a memory card such as the PNY Elite Performance SDHC memory card. It features 90 MB/s read speeds and won't let you down when recording video. It is also enough to capture continuous shots when shooting in RAW which extends the usefulness of a picture when editing them. The advantages of editing when you take a picture in RAW are simply amazing and is something that no normal point and shoot can offer.

Overall I rate this product a 5 stars out of 5 stars!

I hope this review has helped you out!

My Sources: Head Photographer for a High School Yearbook, Amazon Reviewer, Owner of the Camera, Experience in Photography

Camera on Amazon.com:
http://www.amazon.com/Canon-T3i-Digital-Imaging-18-55mm/dp/B004J3V90Y/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1387151246&sr=8-1&keywords=canon+t3i

My Reviewer Page on Amazon:
https://www.amazon.com/gp/pdp/profile/A2Z9S2RQD542CP?ie=UTF8&ref_=ya_your_profile

My Review on the Product:
http://www.amazon.com/review/R1XVKM5R1AK4ZF/ref=cm_aya_cmt?ie=UTF8&ASIN=B004J3V90Y#wasThisHelpful

Camera enthusiasts?

ali

I want to get a 12 mp camera but it says that at high iso settings the noise level is huge.
If i reduce the pixels to say 8mp, does this mean the noise level will be reduced at higher iso settings?

Answer
High MP point and shoot cameras have been foisted on the public by the manufacturers because most people think the higher the MP number, the "better" the camera. Nothing could be farther from the truth. The more and more pixels crammed on the tiny sensors of point and shoot cameras only cause more problems than they solve. Yes, high ISO settings give horrible results, because the tiny pixels cannot gather light as well as the larger pixels on a larger sensor, such as on a DSLR.

As stated before, you need to NOT use high ISO as much as possible. Usually point and shoots get looking pretty bad at anything over ISO 200 to 400.

Use a tripod and keep the ISO low if you want good shots in dim light. Just be sure the camera is not set to automatically raise the ISO in dark conditions.

Steve
http://www.pbase.com/s_parrott

w? are advanteges of buying 10 MegaPixel cameras instead of lower MP cameras?. any disadvantages with high MP?

sree n

Answer
If you always plan to compose your pictures perfectly, you don't need a whole lot of pixels. These days, I'd say that 5 MP or even 4 MP is fine for the average snapshooter and this can be obtained without unreasonable expense. If you want to allow for cropping, which means enlarging only a portion of your image, the more pixels the better.

Imagine taking a scenic view and then noticing that the middle 20% of the photo would make an even better picture. Suppose you take a picture of a whole group of people and Aunt Clara really, really looks great in the picture, but everyone else looks lousy. If you have the pixels to work with, you can still make a decent print of Aunt Clara that she would be happy to have. If you buy an 8-to-10 MP camera and don't want to TAKE large photos, you can always set the camera to a lower file size. You can never go the other direction, though.

Unless the cost is a major issue, buy the camera with more pixels. You will never be sorry that you did, but you might one day be sorry that you didn't.

Having said all that, though, pixels are not the only measure of image quality. The sensor size is important as well as the image processing softare included in the camera. You need to read reviews if you want a critical understanding of image quality for particular cameras. Try http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/ for more information on the cameras you are considering.

What is the best digital camera with the highest megapixels?

Brock

You can name expensive one. Money isn't a problem. Thanks!

Answer
Hasselblad H4D-200MS. 50 megapixels! It's on special for $31k, body only. Lenses start around $2500, and average about $5000. It's a lot of camera to lug about, weighing in at 5.4 pounds. Lenses will add a few more pounds.

If you want something more pocket sized, the Leica S2 series is $23k to $28k. 37 megapixels. Expect to pay about $5000, and up, for lenses. The S2 gets rave reviews.

Then, there's the toy cameras like the Nikon D4 which is only $6000. 16 megapixels. Lenses are anywhere from $100 to $10k.

If number of pixels are a driving factor, then Nikon D800 for $2800. 36 megapixels. The D4 will give better quality images, but the D800 sure has a lot of pixels.

Whats the highest megapixel camera available ?

Lily

please tell me if you know I am looking to spend a lot of money a camera. How much does this camera cost ?

Answer
The LSST has not been built yet, but will be 3.2 gigapixels, you can have one built for approximately 500 million US$.

Or you can walk into any high-end camera shop and for $20,000 to $40,000 (US$) walk out with a Hasselblad with 40mp or more.

Or you can walk into a camera shop or electronics store and walk out with a Canon 1D or a Nikon D3X (both about 24 mp) for about $7000

Android Bionic vs. iPhone 5?

VJames

Answer
Up till now, the Samsung Galaxy S 2 has been slated to be iPhone 5's top contender, given its solid sales outside the U.S. But tech pundits can't afford to count out Motorola's Droid Bionic, which was released well ahead of iPhone 5.

Motorola Droid Bionic was released Sept. 8. Powered by Android 2.3.4 Gingerbread OS, the phone is completely modified from the original one introduced during CES 2011. Some of its key features include a 4.3-inch HD screen with a Corning Gorilla scratch-free screen; two cameras, front-facing for video chat and 8-megapixel back camera; Adobe Flash preloaded; 32 GB of memory and a slim frame.The iPhone 5 is most likely to feature the latest iOS 5 operating system, the A5 processor found in iPad 2, a higher megapixel camera compared to the iPhone 4 and a slimmer and thinner design. According to a Bloomberg report, Apple's next version will have an 8-megapixel camera and 1080p video recording, along with dual-LED flash.Motorola Droid Bionic can score over iPhone 5
check the latest news on android phones on http://www.androidized.com/

Iphone 5 or Samsung Galaxy s4?

KRS

I have a phone upgrade so I kinda need some help picking out a phone. I'm a 15 year old girl and all I really use my phone for is instagram, facebook, twitter, tumblr, youtube, pandora, photography and picture editing apps at times, etc... I recently bought an iphone 3gs off ebay for like 50 dollars so I can see if I like ios and the iphone. I used to have the att impulse 4g but it broke, so that's why I bought the 3gs. Anyways, personally after using the 3gs for about 3 to 4 months I found ios to be quite boring and lacking much of the customization I wanted. All you can customize on ios is your wallpaper/lock screen. It made me really miss andriod. I am at this point leaning a bit more towards the galaxy because of the 13 megapixel camera. I also miss the widgets and such. The only thing I really liked about the iphone was how high security it was, the app store, and the emoji keyboard. My 2 aunts and cousin have the galaxy s3 and I've played around with theirs and I've grown fond of the galaxy and it's beautiful screen. My mom has the iphone 4s and to be honest the only thing I like about it is the camera and siri + the stuff mentioned above. Please help me, all of my friends have iphones, and I kinda want to be different by getting a galaxy, but I like the emoji's and siri on the iphone.
Oh, and I like how the gs4 has expandable memory for me that is pretty important.

Answer
If you rephrased your question it would read
"SGS II lite or S IV

Definitely NOT an IP5 as I don't want to downgrade

Reasons
1)The Samsung Galaxy S II (2)was released in MAY 2011 & has 1.2Ghz Dual Core processor with an 8Mp camera.

18 months later November 2012 Apple puts a 1.2Ghz Dual Core processor & 8Mp camera in a phone and call it the IP5

2)The SGS II is the Dual Core version of the Quad Core SGS III both SGS II & SGS III have won 6 PHONE OF THE YEAR AWARDS.

3)The SGS II is superior and has features not even on the Uber expensive IPhone5.
Not MY opinion proof http://www.gsmarena.com/compare.php3?idPhone1=3621&idPhone2=4238

4) ALL NON APPLE phones have BLUETOOTH MEDIA TRANSFER (SHARING) photos / music cannot be shared if one phone is an iPhone

5-12) http://finance.yahoo.com/news/8-things-the-iphone-5-still-can-t-do.html?_view=desktop&desktop_view_default=true

The BEST DUAL CORE PHONE MADE BY SAMSUNG TO DATE UNTIL THE S4 MINI comes along is the SGS II, half the price TWICE AS GOOD, those 8 things yes you've guessed it SGS II, CAN DO.

Or put another way the 5th Samsung phone is superior to the best iPhone
S IV; SGS III & NOTE 2 [Quad Core] S 4Mini SGS II

The IP5 IS OVERPRICED, many EG BB Z10 are vastly superior. The S 4Mini & BB Z10 are Dual Core phones masquerading as a Quad Core so impressive are the specs . Just behind them are Windows 8 phones, and those are the Dual Core phone of which the IP5 is.
And we have not even mentioned the Quad Core phones which the IP5 costs MORE to get

Apple is years behind

Tuesday, February 25, 2014

What type of video camera do I need to use to make music videos?

marc

I want a type of camera that can film this type of quality.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i3Jv9fNPjgk

How much would the cameras price range out to?

Answer
It depends on your requirements and experience.

Set a budget.

Pocket cams, point and shoot cameras and entry-level consumer camcorders start at around $100 and their small lenses and imaging chips prevent them from providing good video in low light. They are "good" because they are inexpensive. There usually is no mic jack and no manual audio gain control. Kodak Z series. (GoPro and Contour up to about $300.) You will need to add light.

At around $600, the mid range of consumer camcorders does a little better in low light because the lens diameter is larger as is the imaging chip, but the better bet is to add light. A mic jack appears and there may be some manual audio gain control. dSLRs start here - the lenses bump you into the high bracket and audio control is limited - as well, they overheat and have file size and duration limitations. Canon HF R series; HF M series. You will need to add light.

At around $1,100, the high end of consumer camcorders have a mic jack, manual audio control and a few other useful features buried in the menu and difficult to get to and use. Canon HF S series. You *might* need to add light.

The "prosumers" start at around $1,500. the lenses and imaging chips are larger, the audio gain control, might move to the outside of the camcorder along with a shared manual focus/or/zoom ring. Sony HDR-FX7.

The high end of the prosumers gets us to about the $2,600 range - like the Sony HDR-FX1000. Large lens filter diameter and large 3-element (in this case 3CMOS) imaging chip. Basically a pro camcorder, but lacking XLR audio inputs relying on 1/8" (3.5mm) stereo audio input meaning you get to augment that with a XLR adapter from juicedLink or BeachTek. Low compression high quality video. Lots of manual controls on the outside of the camcorder.

Then the pro grade gear goes up to about $80,000. Sony HVR-Z5, Z7; Panasonic AG-HVX200; Canon XF100 and XF300; Red, Silicon Graphics and others... The Balck Maging Cinema Camera and the Canon Cinema camera are nice and not so pricey.

Canon, Panasonic and Sony are "good" consumer, prosumer and professional camcorder manufacturers. So is JVC. GoPro and Contour make "good" action cameras.

Tripods and other steadying devices, mics, and maybe lights and a bunch of other equipment will be needed, too.

dSLRs (like the T3i and 5D Mark 2) are designed to capture still images. They can do well with that. Download and read the manuals from Canon... problems capturing video include overheating (and shutting down - cool down is a long time), motor noise from the zoom and focus motors will be recorded by the internal mic, internal mic is mono, use of good XLR mics requires a XLR adapter (juicedLink or BeachTek), file size limitations, video duration limitations, and more... These can be worked around, but the experience tells you how to workaround... This does not mean they cannot capture good video - they can - but it is a challenging and sometimes difficult environment to deal with. You might save money in the immediate term, until you learn that the video capture device is not the only investment needed...

We don't know what computer you are using, what you plan to edit with (this can do the conversion to the black and white video) or whether you need to spend money for upgrades like external drives...

What is a good DSLR Camera that records HD video for around 300$?

Cody

Answer
There is none - unless you are oen to a bridge camera (can't change lenses). But...

If video is important, then a camcorder is preferred. It is designed to capture video. And audio. capturing still images is a secondary "convenience feature".

If stills are important, than use a still image capture device. Capturing video (and audio) is a secondary "convenience feature". For example, if you read the documentation available for download from the camera manufacturer's web sites, you will find they will overheat when capturing video "for prolonged periods" (about 15 minutes maximum) and stop video capture until it cools down (takes a long time)... or... check their built-in (mono) mic and no (or extremely limited) manual audio control. This means no stereo without an external stereo mic and adding something like a XLR adapter (~$350) to plug into the stereo audio input + use the audio gain controls... or... use an external audio recording device like a Zoom H2, H2n, H4n and take the extra steps to import and sync the audio when editing.

There are no camcorders under about $1,500 that have an interchangeable lens system (Sony NEX VG series).

I am not saying bridge cameras can't capture good video - they can - but they cannot be treated like a camcorder and they cannot replace a camcorder. For example, if you take a bunch of short duration videos because the project is scripted and you are using a shot list, then you should be OK. The time between the short sequences *might* be enough time for the camera to cool down. There are workarounds for lots of things that you normally don't need to worry about when using a camcorder... If you can plan properly, the a bridge camera might work.

Be sure to include lighting (flash and video) requirements, steadying devices (tripod - especially for video), power supplies... and lots of other "accessories" needed for successful video capture.

For $300 you are in the low range of consumer camcorders. Something in the Canon HF R series should fit quite well. We assume your computer and video editor can deal with the AVCHD compressed video for editing...

Pages

Popular Posts