dslr camera compare image
Lightsxx
I'm considering on buying one.
I just want to know if it has more features than a regular digital camera / if its Better or not. because i have a Good digital camera that's about 10.2 mega pixels but i want Professional looking pictures and i think the different Lenses dslr cameras Have are amazing.
Any help would be nice! :) i don't know much..so! lol yes.
Answer
Well the major difference between a digital cams and DSL Rs is in the way of viewing the picture or the scene. Digital cams use LCD or an Electronic Viewfinder while the DSLR or the so called Digital Single Lens Reflex have the optical viewfinders, this means it consist of a return mirror and a pen ta prism.
Another difference between the two includes the chip size, Most DSL Rss use an imaging.
There are DSL Rs with 6 Mega pixel chips, and the digital cams with 8 Mega pixel, as far as I Know Mega pixels are only part of the image quality, and frequently not important. The Size and weight between the two are also different.
DSLR are excellent in image quality at low ISO level, lower noise at a high ISO level, have a wide range of exchangeable lenses, the availability of Image lenses, much brighter and clearer viewfinder compared to the digital cams. DSLR have a high frames rates even if you are in a RAW mode settings and allowing rapid shooting without freezing
Digital Cameras are smaller and lighter weight. The zoom lens is included depending on the price. No shutter and mirror noise. Macro shooting accessibility without other lenses depending on the model; Tilting and revolving the Lcds are allow for framing purposes at short angles. Depth of field at any given image exaggeration and the switching between LCD and E VF is slow.
DSLR don't have real-time histogram, the sensor dust is always a problem, shutter and mirror noise depends on the situation. Large size, particularly with long lenses while digi cams have more issues on viewfinder, slower focus, poor and noisy image quality when the ISO is greater than 100, limited multi frame shooting. Digi cams are slow in focus and can't shoot quickly. Digital Camera freezes for about 6-15 seconds after each RAW shot
Well the major difference between a digital cams and DSL Rs is in the way of viewing the picture or the scene. Digital cams use LCD or an Electronic Viewfinder while the DSLR or the so called Digital Single Lens Reflex have the optical viewfinders, this means it consist of a return mirror and a pen ta prism.
Another difference between the two includes the chip size, Most DSL Rss use an imaging.
There are DSL Rs with 6 Mega pixel chips, and the digital cams with 8 Mega pixel, as far as I Know Mega pixels are only part of the image quality, and frequently not important. The Size and weight between the two are also different.
DSLR are excellent in image quality at low ISO level, lower noise at a high ISO level, have a wide range of exchangeable lenses, the availability of Image lenses, much brighter and clearer viewfinder compared to the digital cams. DSLR have a high frames rates even if you are in a RAW mode settings and allowing rapid shooting without freezing
Digital Cameras are smaller and lighter weight. The zoom lens is included depending on the price. No shutter and mirror noise. Macro shooting accessibility without other lenses depending on the model; Tilting and revolving the Lcds are allow for framing purposes at short angles. Depth of field at any given image exaggeration and the switching between LCD and E VF is slow.
DSLR don't have real-time histogram, the sensor dust is always a problem, shutter and mirror noise depends on the situation. Large size, particularly with long lenses while digi cams have more issues on viewfinder, slower focus, poor and noisy image quality when the ISO is greater than 100, limited multi frame shooting. Digi cams are slow in focus and can't shoot quickly. Digital Camera freezes for about 6-15 seconds after each RAW shot
what is the difference between dslr cameras with a screen on top?
anne
what is the difference between dslr cameras with a screen on top, like the 5D Mark II has a screen on top and the 500D/T1i has no screen on top and it's much smaller? So pls. tell me the difference.
Answer
The top-LCD screen is just one little item in a long list of things that make the more expensive models more user friendly. The top LCD screen shows important settings like the shutter speed, file size, metering mode, and ISO. The same stuff that you can see on the back screen of the 500D with just one button click. Except with a top-LCD, those settings remain visible all the time.
Other little perks include dedicated buttons to change a lot of those settings, vs. diving into the menu with the 500D.
And you get a better viewfinder. And a more durable shutter mechanism. Sometimes weather sealing and a metal body vs. plastic, a more advanced auto-focus system, and so forth.
Lots of little stuff that doesn't have any effect whatsoever on the final image quality. It usually doesn't even show up in the specs when you compare two cameras, but all of those extras do add up to make more expensive cameras better suited for advanced amateurs and professional photographers.
---
added:
BriaR, I considered that but it's probably a wash - the top-LCD uses less power than the larger color screen but it's always on. On my Nikon D200 it continues to display how many shots I can still take on the memory card, even when the camera is turned off.
Much bigger battery drains are
* chimping (reviewing every shot)
* using the pop-up flash
* IS / VR lenses
The top-LCD screen is just one little item in a long list of things that make the more expensive models more user friendly. The top LCD screen shows important settings like the shutter speed, file size, metering mode, and ISO. The same stuff that you can see on the back screen of the 500D with just one button click. Except with a top-LCD, those settings remain visible all the time.
Other little perks include dedicated buttons to change a lot of those settings, vs. diving into the menu with the 500D.
And you get a better viewfinder. And a more durable shutter mechanism. Sometimes weather sealing and a metal body vs. plastic, a more advanced auto-focus system, and so forth.
Lots of little stuff that doesn't have any effect whatsoever on the final image quality. It usually doesn't even show up in the specs when you compare two cameras, but all of those extras do add up to make more expensive cameras better suited for advanced amateurs and professional photographers.
---
added:
BriaR, I considered that but it's probably a wash - the top-LCD uses less power than the larger color screen but it's always on. On my Nikon D200 it continues to display how many shots I can still take on the memory card, even when the camera is turned off.
Much bigger battery drains are
* chimping (reviewing every shot)
* using the pop-up flash
* IS / VR lenses
Powered by Yahoo! Answers
Title Post: Whats the Difference between a regular Digital camera and a Dslr camera?
Rating: 92% based on 9788 ratings. 5 user reviews.
Author: Yukie
Thanks For Coming To My Blog
Rating: 92% based on 9788 ratings. 5 user reviews.
Author: Yukie
Thanks For Coming To My Blog
No comments:
Post a Comment