What are the differences between the Sidekick LX and the Sidekick Slide?

65 megapixel camera image

Jason R

i.e. features, music players, cameras, screens, prices. Has Motorola added any new features too the slide and has Hiptop added anything new to the LX?

Answer
OK, kids--hope you've been nice this year, because here's something you might want to add to your holiday wish lists. Today, T-Mobile announced not one, but two new Sidekicks to be added to its lineup: the T-Mobile Sidekick LX and the T-Mobile Sidekick Slide.
Let's start with the latter since it brings something new to the mobile messaging device: a slide-up screen (all together now: oooohhh, ahhhh). Unlike previous models, which have been manufactured by Sharp/Danger, the Sidekick Slide is made by Motorola and features a smaller design. It measures 4.6 inches wide by 2.6 inches high by 0.6 inch deep and weighs 5.3 ounces, while the T-Mobile Sidekick 3 comes in at 5.1 inches wide by 2.3 inches high by 0.8 inch deep and 6.7 ounces and the Sidekick iD is 5.1 inches by 2.4 inches by 0.8 inch and 6.2 ounces. And hallelujah--it has a higher resolution screen at 320x240 pixels and 65,000 colors. The Slide still has all the messaging options that made the Sidekick popular in the first place, including a personal T-mail account, support for POP3 and IMAP e-mail, integrated AIM, Windows Live, and Yahoo instant messaging clients, and text and multimedia messaging. The quad-band phone also supports the new MySpace Mobile application (a separate download), which you can peep on the phone's Web browser that is said to have better JavaScript support. Other goodies include Bluetooth, a 1.3-megapixel camera with no (!!) video-recording capabilities, and a music player that requires the use of a microSD memory card but supports MP3 and AAC files. The Sidekick Slide will be in stores starting November 7 for $199.99 with a two-year contract.
The T-Mobile Sidekick LX goes the more traditional route in terms of design with its swivel screen. The LX is made by Sharp, and fortunately the company also decided to improve the device's mug with a larger 3-inch, 65,000-color TFT display and 400x240 pixel resolution. It's trimmed down a bit in weight at 5.7 ounces but otherwise retains the same dimensions as the Sidekick 3 mentioned above. You'll have your choice of two colors--midnight blue or espresso brown--and you can program it to light up like a Christmas tree to alert you to text messages, e-mail, and so forth. The Sidekick LX has all the same messaging features of the Slide and also works with MySpace Mobile. Final highlights of the quad-band phone include integrated Bluetooth, a 1.3-megapixel camera (again, no video recording), an MP3 and AAC music player, rated talk-time battery life of 6.8 hours, and a microSD expansion slot. T-Mobile customers get first dibs on the LX starting October 17, while the rest of the world can buy it in stores and online on October 24. Pricing is set at $299.99 with a two-year contract.

Now, we haven't had a chance to play around with these two new Sidekicks yet--we're hearing promises of the next week or two--so it's hard to comment about the new designs, which seem to be the biggest difference between the two devices and the Sidekick 3. Frankly, I wish there was a little more in the multimedia department considering the youth appeal of the Sidekick. Anyway, I'm curious: Among the current Sidekick owners and potential Sidekick owners, which one of these devices are you more interested in and why? Is there enough there to make you want to buy it?

How much to sell camera for if selling for parts only?

Mamawifey

I have a casio exilim ex-z1050 digital camera (10.1 megapixels, 3x optical zoom, 2.5 inch screen)that i dropped and the lens won't go back in, it says lens error... how much can I sell it for parts? i have another camera so i'm not interested in trying to fix it etc... just wondering what I should ask price wise... Thanks :)

Answer
$12.65 exactly

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Digital SLR pixels vs. regular digital pixels?

megapixel camera vs analog camera image

Qwerty

Ok, so I'm thinking about upgrading to a digital SLR camera from my 10megapixel bridge camera, and I was looking at getting the Nikon D40, but it's only 6.1 megapixel. Will this make a big difference in terms of image quality, or will the larger CCD make up for it somehow? Please explain how it works.

Thanks in advance

Answer
Mega pixels is basically a myth. More is not necessarily better. What matters far more is the size of the pixels. The sensors on most DSLR's are nearly 15 times larger than the sensors on point and shoot cameras. Therefore the pixels are 15 times larger. Larger pixels deliver better detail and less noise than smaller ones. Point and shoot camera with tiny sensors packed with lots of pixels actually generate more heat and noise than they would if they had fewer pixels.

Enough about pixels and sensors. The image quality of even the cheapest DSLR will be far greater than even the best point and shoot. The reasons are that DSLR's have much better optics, much larger sensors, better faster processors and much better analog to digital converters.

70mm Imax vs 1080p blu ray?

Taylor

Hi I was wondering which has the best video quality a movie shot using a Imax camera and played in a 70mm Imax theater or a good quality blu ray disk played on a home HDtv or projector. Also are 70mm Imax projectors always professionaly calibrated because I know that is a problem with some theaters.

Answer
70mm IMAX is shot on 50mm analog film, and played back in analog format. It is hard to directly compare it to digital, but it is equivalent to roughly 27 megapixels. Blu Ray is a little over 2 megapixels. IMAX is designed to look great on a humongous screen. If you showed Blu Ray on the same humongous screen, you'd probably notice the pixelization, but will look great on a smaller, home screen.

Powered by Yahoo! Answers