ross
Looking to upgrade from a Nikon D40 that was stolen. I'm not as interested in extra features like video as I am in picture quality. Ideally but not necessarily with a lens.
I loved my D40. It was my first DSLR. I barely took it off manual mode. I was sort of outgrowing the megapixels and limited ISO range but it was great.
Some solid advice would be greatly appreciated!
Answer
Be bold! if you don't have a lot invested in Nikon glass, take a look at the Sony A57 for 699, body only.
http://www.youtube.com/leanback#watch/vC5rKPlgXSU?listId=SRAsony%20a57&index=1
One thing you mention about video, you don't really have a choice. If you buy a new 2011 or 2012 model dSLR or dSLT camera, it will most likely have video. This does not affect stills quality, so it's just not an issue.
Nikon just announced the new D3200 camera. All Nikon dSLRs use Sony image sensors, and this one was taken from the Sony A65 and A77. A good sensor, but not great in low light, part of the problem is too many pixels (24 megapixels). So if you stick with Nikon, know that going in, also like all the entry level Nikons, it still has no auto focus motor, not an issue until you buy a lens with no motor.
So while the image quality at high ISO got better after the D40 with the D3000, and D3100, I suspect that Nikon took a step backward at high ISO with the D3200 despite that fact that Nikon does a good job with handling Sony image sensors, they can't change the laws of physics.
For better ISO performance, it might be better to go with a D3100 or D5100 or wait and see what Nikon does with the d5100 replacement.
Be bold! if you don't have a lot invested in Nikon glass, take a look at the Sony A57 for 699, body only.
http://www.youtube.com/leanback#watch/vC5rKPlgXSU?listId=SRAsony%20a57&index=1
One thing you mention about video, you don't really have a choice. If you buy a new 2011 or 2012 model dSLR or dSLT camera, it will most likely have video. This does not affect stills quality, so it's just not an issue.
Nikon just announced the new D3200 camera. All Nikon dSLRs use Sony image sensors, and this one was taken from the Sony A65 and A77. A good sensor, but not great in low light, part of the problem is too many pixels (24 megapixels). So if you stick with Nikon, know that going in, also like all the entry level Nikons, it still has no auto focus motor, not an issue until you buy a lens with no motor.
So while the image quality at high ISO got better after the D40 with the D3000, and D3100, I suspect that Nikon took a step backward at high ISO with the D3200 despite that fact that Nikon does a good job with handling Sony image sensors, they can't change the laws of physics.
For better ISO performance, it might be better to go with a D3100 or D5100 or wait and see what Nikon does with the d5100 replacement.
Best Digital Camera?
LoserFace
I'm looking for a new digital camera that can be used for hobby work, so I guess professional level.
I'm thinking of spending up to about 600-700$ at most. Any suggestions?
Answer
It entirely depends on WHAT you WANT the camera to be able to do. Every camera has its pros and its cons. Some camera's will have most of the functions you're looking for, while others will have the ones that the other camera's don't. Its always a trade off, a compromise.
Do you want it specifically for photography or do you want movie mode? Do you want a wide range of zoom, or does that even matter? Do you want the ability to take good macro shots? action shots?
If you're looking for proffesional quality - aim for the higher mega pixels. Go for the pro-summer, or DSLR cameras. Keep in mind, DSLR cameras offer better variety as you can get more lenses later, and when you want to change cameras, all you have to do is replace the body (making sure the new body is compatible with your existing lenses). Lenses though can easily cost as much as a new pro-summer camera; so this option depends on your money situation and your interest in photography. You also will have to lug around any lenses you wish to use when taking your camera with you - so that will mean a pretty big camera case at your side. Pro-summer cameras (like a Nikon 8800) have alot of the same functions as a DSLR, but are smaller in size.
A popular and highly rated DSLR (which I just about bought myself) is the Canon Rebel XT. And now with the EOS 30D out, the XT has dropped in price by about $200 (CDN) from last year.
The camera I bought, I took a chance on as there were no reviews on it available was the Fuji E900. For the most part its a good little camera. The down side in my opinion is the 3inch macro (meaning you have to be 3inches from say the flower you're trying to get a close up shot of); but with it being 9mp this usually isn't a problem as cropping is easy while still maintaining high quality image. To me, its not as good at picking out blues as a Canon is, but its not too bad either. I've found Canon's tend to be better as making colors vibrant.
I strayed from Canon's this time though, especially the other Canon model I was looking at, the S 80 I think it was (though I could easily be wrong abou the name), because everyone at the stores told me that they were having a lot of troubles with the Canon models at the time, and that there were hundreds of customers bringing them back to claim warrenties because of the LCD screens.
I have to send my little E900 in for repairs as it seems to have pixel degridation. Have heard some one else is having the same problem with their Nikon 60.
Chances are if something will go wrong, hopefully it will be when your warrenty is still good.
This is a very good site for digital camera reviews:
http://www.steves-digicams.com/
Make sure to do your research about the cameras that you are considering, because they may not be as nice as they appear in the adds.
Good luck choosing your camera. Even if you find out after buying one that its not quite right, chances are it'll do just fine till you can buy a new one. And technology changes all the time!
My little camera was one of the top of the line consumer/pro-sumers when it came out, and now it isn't and it's dropped $60; and it hasn't even been a year yet since I bought it (November).
And once you buy a camera - I recommend keeping an eye on the flyers for the entire time you have a price guarantee (if you buy from a store that has that), because you may be able to get some money back if said store, or competition, places the camera on sale.
Happy photo taking.
It entirely depends on WHAT you WANT the camera to be able to do. Every camera has its pros and its cons. Some camera's will have most of the functions you're looking for, while others will have the ones that the other camera's don't. Its always a trade off, a compromise.
Do you want it specifically for photography or do you want movie mode? Do you want a wide range of zoom, or does that even matter? Do you want the ability to take good macro shots? action shots?
If you're looking for proffesional quality - aim for the higher mega pixels. Go for the pro-summer, or DSLR cameras. Keep in mind, DSLR cameras offer better variety as you can get more lenses later, and when you want to change cameras, all you have to do is replace the body (making sure the new body is compatible with your existing lenses). Lenses though can easily cost as much as a new pro-summer camera; so this option depends on your money situation and your interest in photography. You also will have to lug around any lenses you wish to use when taking your camera with you - so that will mean a pretty big camera case at your side. Pro-summer cameras (like a Nikon 8800) have alot of the same functions as a DSLR, but are smaller in size.
A popular and highly rated DSLR (which I just about bought myself) is the Canon Rebel XT. And now with the EOS 30D out, the XT has dropped in price by about $200 (CDN) from last year.
The camera I bought, I took a chance on as there were no reviews on it available was the Fuji E900. For the most part its a good little camera. The down side in my opinion is the 3inch macro (meaning you have to be 3inches from say the flower you're trying to get a close up shot of); but with it being 9mp this usually isn't a problem as cropping is easy while still maintaining high quality image. To me, its not as good at picking out blues as a Canon is, but its not too bad either. I've found Canon's tend to be better as making colors vibrant.
I strayed from Canon's this time though, especially the other Canon model I was looking at, the S 80 I think it was (though I could easily be wrong abou the name), because everyone at the stores told me that they were having a lot of troubles with the Canon models at the time, and that there were hundreds of customers bringing them back to claim warrenties because of the LCD screens.
I have to send my little E900 in for repairs as it seems to have pixel degridation. Have heard some one else is having the same problem with their Nikon 60.
Chances are if something will go wrong, hopefully it will be when your warrenty is still good.
This is a very good site for digital camera reviews:
http://www.steves-digicams.com/
Make sure to do your research about the cameras that you are considering, because they may not be as nice as they appear in the adds.
Good luck choosing your camera. Even if you find out after buying one that its not quite right, chances are it'll do just fine till you can buy a new one. And technology changes all the time!
My little camera was one of the top of the line consumer/pro-sumers when it came out, and now it isn't and it's dropped $60; and it hasn't even been a year yet since I bought it (November).
And once you buy a camera - I recommend keeping an eye on the flyers for the entire time you have a price guarantee (if you buy from a store that has that), because you may be able to get some money back if said store, or competition, places the camera on sale.
Happy photo taking.
Powered by Yahoo! Answers
Title Post: What is a good DSLR camera under $700?
Rating: 92% based on 9788 ratings. 5 user reviews.
Author: Yukie
Thanks For Coming To My Blog
Rating: 92% based on 9788 ratings. 5 user reviews.
Author: Yukie
Thanks For Coming To My Blog
No comments:
Post a Comment