Q. my camera keeps getting this:
http://www.plspictures.com/share.do?invite=dE3r4hzd55zH3zaaaazo
It should have been like this:
http://media.photobucket.com/image/pls/fissazionejewls/RINGS/230336-1BB.jpg?o=12
I have the Samsung Seek and my provider is the I-wireless.
http://www.plspictures.com/share.do?invite=dE3r4hzd55zH3zaaaazo
It should have been like this:
http://media.photobucket.com/image/pls/fissazionejewls/RINGS/230336-1BB.jpg?o=12
I have the Samsung Seek and my provider is the I-wireless.
Answer
a 1.3 mp sensor is like those found on cell phones or webcams.
The results you are getting are just about right for those cameras
The sample of what you want could be achieved using a 6 mp dSLR (like a Nikon D100 or D40) using a macro lens
It seems that you have unrealistic expectations of your tiny camera.
Most people who are shooting products for sale on the Internet, use at a minimum, a 8 mp P&S or as mentioned a 6 mp dSLR camera. When shooting jewelry, some kind of light tent is used as well to provide even lighting.
a 1.3 mp sensor is like those found on cell phones or webcams.
The results you are getting are just about right for those cameras
The sample of what you want could be achieved using a 6 mp dSLR (like a Nikon D100 or D40) using a macro lens
It seems that you have unrealistic expectations of your tiny camera.
Most people who are shooting products for sale on the Internet, use at a minimum, a 8 mp P&S or as mentioned a 6 mp dSLR camera. When shooting jewelry, some kind of light tent is used as well to provide even lighting.
My 1.3 MegaPixel Camera....?
AladdinZan
I had a 5MP camera and it broke. It just stopped working for no reason.
So I started using a Photoclip 5 in 1 that I had years ago and shelved. It is fantastic. The photos are very very good quality and I am surprised - even when I am not using the full size pics.
How can this be so? Surely 5MP pics must be better, or is it the build quality of the camera?
Answer
Are you viewing these on your PC? If so than that would be the main reason. Resolutions beyond a MP or two generally only make a difference in print.
More than that though, and despite what the camera makers would have you believe, megapixels definitely aren't everything. The quality of the lens plays a big part as well. While it sounds a bit counterproductive for a camera maker to stick a sensor with higher resolution than the glass in front of it could resolve in the first place, this often the case. Detail destroying "noise" is another factor. Ironically as you increase the number of pixels, as a rule this also goes up. On many recent compact digitals it has gotten to the point where this noise is so severe that at best it completely cancels out any resolution benefit these cameras would otherwise have had!
Are you viewing these on your PC? If so than that would be the main reason. Resolutions beyond a MP or two generally only make a difference in print.
More than that though, and despite what the camera makers would have you believe, megapixels definitely aren't everything. The quality of the lens plays a big part as well. While it sounds a bit counterproductive for a camera maker to stick a sensor with higher resolution than the glass in front of it could resolve in the first place, this often the case. Detail destroying "noise" is another factor. Ironically as you increase the number of pixels, as a rule this also goes up. On many recent compact digitals it has gotten to the point where this noise is so severe that at best it completely cancels out any resolution benefit these cameras would otherwise have had!
Powered by Yahoo! Answers
Title Post: What is a 1.3 megapixel camera look like? (please help!)?
Rating: 92% based on 9788 ratings. 5 user reviews.
Author: Yukie
Thanks For Coming To My Blog
Rating: 92% based on 9788 ratings. 5 user reviews.
Author: Yukie
Thanks For Coming To My Blog
No comments:
Post a Comment