highest megapixel camera consumer image
Q. I'm looking at two cameras here. One is a Canon 1D (the original 4MP outfit for pros) that has a really low shutter count (less than 8000 shots taken, and the shutter is rated at 100,000). The other is a new Canon 30D. Both are going to cost me about the same. The 30D has a higher megapixel count, but it is also a consumer grade camera. The 1D has a larger sensor, but this is also a camera that is several years old.
Which is going to give me the best quality images? Which will hold out longer? What are some important points to consider? I mostly shoot family portraits and weddings. Any tips or suggestions?
Which is going to give me the best quality images? Which will hold out longer? What are some important points to consider? I mostly shoot family portraits and weddings. Any tips or suggestions?
Answer
As much as I love the Canon 1-series, I wouldn't give an old 1D a second look. It's more robust, with weather seals etc., it has a larger sensor (but it's still not full-frame and not a Canon-made sensor or CMOS sensor either for that matter)... this series of cameras were/are made for sports photogs primarily, mostly for their fast burst rates.
The 30D is robust as well and I would personally rate it as a prosumer rather than a consumer cam... it should have a much better sensor that'll give you much cleaner output at high ISOs (important for wedding shoots), it has a durable shutter that should last the camera well into obsolescence (and you can always get a new shutter anyways), and higher mp-count, which might be a pretty huge factor when it comes to making large prints.
Unless you're getting the 1D dirt cheap, I'd skip it. That model, in terms of image quality, was very good but that was before Canon developed its own superior CMOS sensors, such as what you'd get with the 30D.
Another consideration: most likely there'll be a 40D out in the next few weeks or couple of months... you might want to wait and see what the new model offers you or at the very least get a 30D at a clearance price then ;)
And PS - the 1D does not have a significantly longer-lasting shutter. The 1D mkIIN for example has a shutter rated for 200,000 actuations, which was an improvement over the 1DmkII, which was an improvement over the 1D.
As much as I love the Canon 1-series, I wouldn't give an old 1D a second look. It's more robust, with weather seals etc., it has a larger sensor (but it's still not full-frame and not a Canon-made sensor or CMOS sensor either for that matter)... this series of cameras were/are made for sports photogs primarily, mostly for their fast burst rates.
The 30D is robust as well and I would personally rate it as a prosumer rather than a consumer cam... it should have a much better sensor that'll give you much cleaner output at high ISOs (important for wedding shoots), it has a durable shutter that should last the camera well into obsolescence (and you can always get a new shutter anyways), and higher mp-count, which might be a pretty huge factor when it comes to making large prints.
Unless you're getting the 1D dirt cheap, I'd skip it. That model, in terms of image quality, was very good but that was before Canon developed its own superior CMOS sensors, such as what you'd get with the 30D.
Another consideration: most likely there'll be a 40D out in the next few weeks or couple of months... you might want to wait and see what the new model offers you or at the very least get a 30D at a clearance price then ;)
And PS - the 1D does not have a significantly longer-lasting shutter. The 1D mkIIN for example has a shutter rated for 200,000 actuations, which was an improvement over the 1DmkII, which was an improvement over the 1D.
Im looking for a really good but cheapish hd camera?
Q. basically my limit is about £400-500 and i need a good hd camera with high megapixels and good settings to allow me to shoot with a different amount of frames per second for slow motion shots etc. any suggestions?
Answer
Megapixels mean nothing when talking about camcorders. Slow motion is better done with the NLE you use, rather than the camcorder.
The best video images to be had come from a MiniDV tape camcorder. Every other storage media type camcorders interpolate the video, which means the video you transfer from this device; about 80% of the content of that file did not come from the lens assembly on the camcorder, but rather from electronic circuitry within the camcorder. This occurs because of the way every consumer level HD camcorders that does not use MiniDV tape media, takes video. You turn these on, press record and the camcorder takes one frame from the camcorder lens assembly, then makes 4 or 5 frames from the electronic circuitry within the camcorder then another frame from the lens and 4 or 5 frames not from the lens, this goes on and on throughout your whole video. This means do not a point a consumer level HD camcorders, that does not use MiniDV tape media, at any moving thing, as the resulting video will be mostly unwatchable. Then blend in the fact, these camcorders videos take pretty beefed up computer for editing and proper viewing. MiniDV tape camcorder is the way to go.
Megapixels mean nothing when talking about camcorders. Slow motion is better done with the NLE you use, rather than the camcorder.
The best video images to be had come from a MiniDV tape camcorder. Every other storage media type camcorders interpolate the video, which means the video you transfer from this device; about 80% of the content of that file did not come from the lens assembly on the camcorder, but rather from electronic circuitry within the camcorder. This occurs because of the way every consumer level HD camcorders that does not use MiniDV tape media, takes video. You turn these on, press record and the camcorder takes one frame from the camcorder lens assembly, then makes 4 or 5 frames from the electronic circuitry within the camcorder then another frame from the lens and 4 or 5 frames not from the lens, this goes on and on throughout your whole video. This means do not a point a consumer level HD camcorders, that does not use MiniDV tape media, at any moving thing, as the resulting video will be mostly unwatchable. Then blend in the fact, these camcorders videos take pretty beefed up computer for editing and proper viewing. MiniDV tape camcorder is the way to go.
Powered by Yahoo! Answers
Title Post: Which is the better option for a professional; a Canon 30D or a Canon EOS 1D?
Rating: 92% based on 9788 ratings. 5 user reviews.
Author: Yukie
Thanks For Coming To My Blog
Rating: 92% based on 9788 ratings. 5 user reviews.
Author: Yukie
Thanks For Coming To My Blog
No comments:
Post a Comment