dslr camera 40 megapixel image
beefeh
I want to experimentate learning some photography by myself to see if I would like it as a career, but I don't invest that much money just now, so I need some help finding a good cheap camera.
Answer
If your mot sure about whether you want to persue photography. I would suggest a used well built camera. A used Nikon D1 is only 2.7 megapixels. But it is weel built to last. It also will take cheaper nikon AI lenses. I bought a used D! last year for under $100. 50mm f2. Nikkor lens can be bought on ebay for aroud $40. You will be able to get the feel and funtions of a DSLR. But the price will be a fraction of the cost of a new camera. Also if you decide to invest more money later. You will already be experienced on how a Nikon DSLR works.
If your mot sure about whether you want to persue photography. I would suggest a used well built camera. A used Nikon D1 is only 2.7 megapixels. But it is weel built to last. It also will take cheaper nikon AI lenses. I bought a used D! last year for under $100. 50mm f2. Nikkor lens can be bought on ebay for aroud $40. You will be able to get the feel and funtions of a DSLR. But the price will be a fraction of the cost of a new camera. Also if you decide to invest more money later. You will already be experienced on how a Nikon DSLR works.
What are some good photography cameras?
(: ily
i do photography and im looking to buy a really good/professional photography camera.
can anyone give me some suggestions && prices?
Answer
Professional cameras are top of the line DSLR designed for hundreds of thousand of activations and consistent day to day operations in all situations and conditions. Most people don't want or need a camera like that. Nor do they want the cost that goes with them
What you do want is a good quality Digital Single Lens Reflex camera. That will give you great color, clarity and quality photos. Both Canon and Nikon make great cameras and in truth it usually comes down to personal preference. So look at both, go and get them in hand to see which you like the feel of better and you'll not be wrong with either brand. Since you already have a Nikon SLR then getting another Nikon will let you use lenses and accessories you already have. You do not have to start from scratch
As to a recommendation IMHO Dollar for dollar there is no better entry level DSLR than the Nikon 40. Do not let the low megapixel count concern you. If you do not make very very large prints you will never notice it. It is easy and fun to use. It gives great quality pictures. I have both a D300 and a D40 and I often grab the D40 for family shots just because it is so fun to use and light. The D40 will let you grow as you learn more about cameras. Nikon makes a number of lenses for the camera as do third party lens manufacturers.
A great review on it can be found here
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/d40.htm
If you can afford a little more the D60 give you a number of things you want. It has newer firmware and image processors, designed for the 10 mp sensor. It has an "Active Dust Reduction System with Airflow Control ". Nikon not putting a system on the D40 to deal with dust is one of the biggest drawbacks I see to the D40 ( though I think its still a great camera for the money) If you change lenses dust will get in and the camera needs a system to deal with it. With the D60 you get a VR lens. That will help with low light situations ( they may offer that now with the D40 but originally it was not) . The D60 has Adaptive Dynamic Range. Nikon calls it "Active D-Lighting," it lets you save some highlights that my otherwise be lost. It has a newer better metering system than the D40.
Some people will want to make a big issue out of the fact that there are some nikon lenses that will not autofocus on these cameras. Right now there are "only" about 39 lenses that autofocus on these cameras. They cover the range of focal lengths. I doubt any photographer would be seriously limited with "only" this many lenses to choose from. If you want to manually focus you can more than double this and do so at a low cost. Manual focusing is easy and how we did things for decades before the advent of autofocus.
Cannon and Nikon chose to put the vibration reduction in the lens rather than the body. Somefolks put it in the camera and make of that. Yes that means you get stabilization only on lenses with that feature built in. In the body in theory it would work on every lens. But in fact image stbilization in the lens has proved to work faster and smoother with a lower impact on focus times than image stabilization in the body
Professional cameras are top of the line DSLR designed for hundreds of thousand of activations and consistent day to day operations in all situations and conditions. Most people don't want or need a camera like that. Nor do they want the cost that goes with them
What you do want is a good quality Digital Single Lens Reflex camera. That will give you great color, clarity and quality photos. Both Canon and Nikon make great cameras and in truth it usually comes down to personal preference. So look at both, go and get them in hand to see which you like the feel of better and you'll not be wrong with either brand. Since you already have a Nikon SLR then getting another Nikon will let you use lenses and accessories you already have. You do not have to start from scratch
As to a recommendation IMHO Dollar for dollar there is no better entry level DSLR than the Nikon 40. Do not let the low megapixel count concern you. If you do not make very very large prints you will never notice it. It is easy and fun to use. It gives great quality pictures. I have both a D300 and a D40 and I often grab the D40 for family shots just because it is so fun to use and light. The D40 will let you grow as you learn more about cameras. Nikon makes a number of lenses for the camera as do third party lens manufacturers.
A great review on it can be found here
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/d40.htm
If you can afford a little more the D60 give you a number of things you want. It has newer firmware and image processors, designed for the 10 mp sensor. It has an "Active Dust Reduction System with Airflow Control ". Nikon not putting a system on the D40 to deal with dust is one of the biggest drawbacks I see to the D40 ( though I think its still a great camera for the money) If you change lenses dust will get in and the camera needs a system to deal with it. With the D60 you get a VR lens. That will help with low light situations ( they may offer that now with the D40 but originally it was not) . The D60 has Adaptive Dynamic Range. Nikon calls it "Active D-Lighting," it lets you save some highlights that my otherwise be lost. It has a newer better metering system than the D40.
Some people will want to make a big issue out of the fact that there are some nikon lenses that will not autofocus on these cameras. Right now there are "only" about 39 lenses that autofocus on these cameras. They cover the range of focal lengths. I doubt any photographer would be seriously limited with "only" this many lenses to choose from. If you want to manually focus you can more than double this and do so at a low cost. Manual focusing is easy and how we did things for decades before the advent of autofocus.
Cannon and Nikon chose to put the vibration reduction in the lens rather than the body. Somefolks put it in the camera and make of that. Yes that means you get stabilization only on lenses with that feature built in. In the body in theory it would work on every lens. But in fact image stbilization in the lens has proved to work faster and smoother with a lower impact on focus times than image stabilization in the body
Powered by Yahoo! Answers
Title Post: What's a VERY good, VERY cheap camera for a begginer photographer?
Rating: 92% based on 9788 ratings. 5 user reviews.
Author: Yukie
Thanks For Coming To My Blog
Rating: 92% based on 9788 ratings. 5 user reviews.
Author: Yukie
Thanks For Coming To My Blog
No comments:
Post a Comment